Interaction between rock bolt and rock bridge under tensile loading

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Geomechanics and Engineering Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.12989/GAE.2021.25.6.455
V. Sarfarazi, Kaveh Asgari, M. Nasrollahi
{"title":"Interaction between rock bolt and rock bridge under tensile loading","authors":"V. Sarfarazi, Kaveh Asgari, M. Nasrollahi","doi":"10.12989/GAE.2021.25.6.455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is investigating the effect of loading rates on the interaction between rock bolts and rock bridges using experimental test and numerical simulation. A new test set up was developed experimentally for determination of tensile strength of bridge area. A concrete block with dimensions of 15 x 15 x 10 cm consisting non-persistent notch was prepared and subjected to tensile loading using special loading set up. The configuration of non-persistent joint was different in various samples. A 30-ton hydraulic load cell applied tensile loading to concrete complex with a high-pressure rate of 0.01 mm per second. Simultaneously with experimental test, numerical simulation was performed on the tensile behavior of non-persistent joint adjacent to rock bolt. Two sets of non-persistent joint were prepared. The first sets were similar to experimental one while, in the second sets, two edge joints with lengths of 1.5 cm, 3 cm and 4.5 cm were prepared. The angle of these joint related to horizontal axis were 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90. Also, the rock bolts adjacent to joints were simulated and were subjected to tensile loading with two high and low loading rates i.e. 0.01 mm/sec and 0.0001 mm/sec. The results showed that the crack propagation angle related to tensile load direction was decreased by decreasing the tensile loading rate. The tensile failure stress decreased by presence of pre-existing crack within the model. Tensile failure stress had minimum value whenever the angle of pre-existing crack was 0o. The numerical results were in a good accordance with experimental ones.","PeriodicalId":12602,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/GAE.2021.25.6.455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The objective of this study is investigating the effect of loading rates on the interaction between rock bolts and rock bridges using experimental test and numerical simulation. A new test set up was developed experimentally for determination of tensile strength of bridge area. A concrete block with dimensions of 15 x 15 x 10 cm consisting non-persistent notch was prepared and subjected to tensile loading using special loading set up. The configuration of non-persistent joint was different in various samples. A 30-ton hydraulic load cell applied tensile loading to concrete complex with a high-pressure rate of 0.01 mm per second. Simultaneously with experimental test, numerical simulation was performed on the tensile behavior of non-persistent joint adjacent to rock bolt. Two sets of non-persistent joint were prepared. The first sets were similar to experimental one while, in the second sets, two edge joints with lengths of 1.5 cm, 3 cm and 4.5 cm were prepared. The angle of these joint related to horizontal axis were 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90. Also, the rock bolts adjacent to joints were simulated and were subjected to tensile loading with two high and low loading rates i.e. 0.01 mm/sec and 0.0001 mm/sec. The results showed that the crack propagation angle related to tensile load direction was decreased by decreasing the tensile loading rate. The tensile failure stress decreased by presence of pre-existing crack within the model. Tensile failure stress had minimum value whenever the angle of pre-existing crack was 0o. The numerical results were in a good accordance with experimental ones.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉载作用下锚杆与岩桥的相互作用
本研究的目的是通过试验试验和数值模拟来研究加载速率对岩石锚杆与岩石桥梁相互作用的影响。研制了一种新型的桥梁区域抗拉强度试验装置。制备了尺寸为15 x 15 x 10 cm的混凝土块,其中包含非持久缺口,并使用特殊加载装置进行拉伸加载。不同试样的非持久接头形态不同。一个30吨的液压测压元件以每秒0.01毫米的高压速率对混凝土复合体施加拉伸载荷。在进行试验试验的同时,对锚杆相邻非持久节理的抗拉特性进行了数值模拟。制备两组非持续性关节。第一组与实验组相似,第二组分别制备长度为1.5 cm、3 cm和4.5 cm的两个边缘接头。这些关节与水平轴的夹角分别为0、15、30、45、60、75和90。模拟节理附近的锚杆,分别以0.01 mm/sec和0.0001 mm/sec两种高、低加载速率进行拉伸加载。结果表明:随着拉伸加载速率的降低,与拉伸加载方向相关的裂纹扩展角减小;由于模型中存在预先存在的裂纹,拉伸破坏应力减小。当预存裂纹角度为0时,拉伸破坏应力最小。数值计算结果与实验结果吻合较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomechanics and Engineering
Geomechanics and Engineering ENGINEERING, CIVIL-ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Geomechanics and Engineering aims at opening an easy access to the valuable source of information and providing an excellent publication channel for the global community of researchers in the geomechanics and its applications. Typical subjects covered by the journal include: - Analytical, computational, and experimental multiscale and interaction mechanics- Computational and Theoretical Geomechnics- Foundations- Tunneling- Earth Structures- Site Characterization- Soil-Structure Interactions
期刊最新文献
An analytical approach to estimate the mechanical state of roof strata in underground longwall mining Investigating of free vibration behavior of bidirectional FG beams resting on variable elastic foundation Evaluation of grout penetration in single rock fracture using electrical resistivity Study on lateral behavior of digging well foundation with consideration of soil-foundation interaction A novel preloading method for foundation underpinning for the remodeling of an existing building
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1