An Examination of Outdoor Garden Bed Designs in a Subarctic Community

IF 0.9 4区 地球科学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Arctic Pub Date : 2023-03-14 DOI:10.14430/arctic77061
M. Wilton, J. Karagatzides, A. Solomon, L. Tsuji
{"title":"An Examination of Outdoor Garden Bed Designs in a Subarctic Community","authors":"M. Wilton, J. Karagatzides, A. Solomon, L. Tsuji","doi":"10.14430/arctic77061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the global level, interest is growing in extending agricultural activities northwards to increase future food production. Agricultural activities are emerging at the local level in the subarctic and Arctic regions in order to adapt to climate change, mitigate food insecurities, and build up food autonomy. This pilot crop management study was situated in the Hudson Bay Lowlands within an isolated, Indigenous community garden site surrounded by a mature shelterbelt. The study’s purpose was to compare kale growing in three types of low-cost garden bed treatments (four plots per treatment) under ambient conditions in a subarctic climate. The 2019 study measured aboveground biomass and total leaf surface area of kale, monitored soil climate conditions of each treatment, and deciphered, with regards to regional suitability, the benefits and drawbacks of each garden bed treatment. Kale cultivated in the standard boxes (0.25 m height raised bed) and hügelkultur-style boxes (0.50 m height raised bed, including a layer of buried woody debris) resulted in 44 – 58% more aboveground mass and 52% more total surface area than were yielded in kale cultivated in the ground treatment (not elevated), but these increases did not represent statistically significant differences among treatments (ANOVA, p ≥ 0.12) because of the large variation likely from a small sample size. The two raised box treatments increased early-season soil temperatures by 0.5˚C to 2.5˚C and reduced soil moisture by 41% – 53% compared to the ground treatment. We determined that the standard box treatment is best suited for the study site for improving soil climate conditions, protecting against water erosion, and decreasing the need to bend over. ","PeriodicalId":55464,"journal":{"name":"Arctic","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arctic","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic77061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the global level, interest is growing in extending agricultural activities northwards to increase future food production. Agricultural activities are emerging at the local level in the subarctic and Arctic regions in order to adapt to climate change, mitigate food insecurities, and build up food autonomy. This pilot crop management study was situated in the Hudson Bay Lowlands within an isolated, Indigenous community garden site surrounded by a mature shelterbelt. The study’s purpose was to compare kale growing in three types of low-cost garden bed treatments (four plots per treatment) under ambient conditions in a subarctic climate. The 2019 study measured aboveground biomass and total leaf surface area of kale, monitored soil climate conditions of each treatment, and deciphered, with regards to regional suitability, the benefits and drawbacks of each garden bed treatment. Kale cultivated in the standard boxes (0.25 m height raised bed) and hügelkultur-style boxes (0.50 m height raised bed, including a layer of buried woody debris) resulted in 44 – 58% more aboveground mass and 52% more total surface area than were yielded in kale cultivated in the ground treatment (not elevated), but these increases did not represent statistically significant differences among treatments (ANOVA, p ≥ 0.12) because of the large variation likely from a small sample size. The two raised box treatments increased early-season soil temperatures by 0.5˚C to 2.5˚C and reduced soil moisture by 41% – 53% compared to the ground treatment. We determined that the standard box treatment is best suited for the study site for improving soil climate conditions, protecting against water erosion, and decreasing the need to bend over. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚北极社区户外花园床设计研究
在全球一级,人们越来越有兴趣将农业活动向北扩展,以增加未来的粮食生产。为了适应气候变化、减轻粮食不安全状况和建立粮食自主权,亚北极和北极地区正在地方一级开展农业活动。这项试点作物管理研究位于哈德逊湾低地,在一个被成熟防护林包围的孤立的土著社区花园场地内。这项研究的目的是比较在亚北极气候的环境条件下,羽衣甘蓝在三种低成本花园床处理(每种处理四块)下的生长情况。2019年的研究测量了羽衣甘蓝的地上生物量和总叶表面积,监测了每种处理的土壤气候条件,并在区域适用性方面破译了每种园床处理的利弊。标准箱(0.25 m高的挑床)和h凝胶培养箱(0.50 m高的挑床,包括一层掩埋的木质碎片)中栽培的羽衣甘蓝比地面处理(不挑床)中栽培的羽衣甘蓝的地上质量增加了44 - 58%,总表面积增加了52%,但这些增加并不代表处理之间的统计学差异(方差分析,p≥0.12),因为小样本量可能存在较大差异。与地面处理相比,两种垄沟箱处理的季前土壤温度提高了0.5 ~ 2.5℃,土壤水分降低了41% ~ 53%。我们确定标准箱处理最适合研究地点,以改善土壤气候条件,防止水蚀,减少弯腰的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arctic
Arctic 地学-环境科学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Arctic is a peer-reviewed, primary research journal that publishes the results of scientific research from all areas of Arctic scholarship. Original scholarly papers in the physical, social, and biological sciences, humanities, engineering, and technology are included, as are book reviews, commentaries, letters to the editor, and profiles of significant people, places, or events of northern interest
期刊最新文献
Compass, by Murray Lee George Noongwook (1949–2023) Community Perspectives on Inuit Country Food Insecurity in Gjoa Haven, Nunavut Participatory Video: One Contemporary Way for Cree and Inuit Adolescents to Relate to the Land in Nunavik Antarctic Pioneer: The Trailblazing Life of Jackie Ronne, by Joanna Kafarowski
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1