The Risk of Birth Defects in Dichorionic Twins Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology

T. Kuwata, S. Matsubara, A. Ohkuchi, Takashi Watanabe, A. Izumi, Y. Honma, Y. Yada, H. Shibahara, Mitsuaki Suzuki
{"title":"The Risk of Birth Defects in Dichorionic Twins Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology","authors":"T. Kuwata, S. Matsubara, A. Ohkuchi, Takashi Watanabe, A. Izumi, Y. Honma, Y. Yada, H. Shibahara, Mitsuaki Suzuki","doi":"10.1375/twin.7.3.223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine whether dichorionic twins conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART; intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI], in vitro fertilization [IVF], gameteintrafallopian tube transfer [GIFT]) have a higher risk of birth defects compared to dichorionic twins conceived naturally. We reviewed the medical records of 406 mothers with dichorionic twin pregnancies, who received continuous antenatal care from ≤ 20 weeks of gestation and gave birth to infants after ≥ 24 weeks of gestation in our institute. Birth defects were diagnosed at the time of hospital discharge according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Occurrence of birth defects was compared between twins conceived by ART and those conceived naturally using logistic regression analysis. Overall, 51 of 812 infants (51/812 = 6.2%) had birth defects. The incidence of birth defects in ART-conceived twins was significantly higher than that of naturally conceived twins with an odds ratio of 6.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1, 22.5), 3.7 (95% CI 1.2, 12.0), and 4.3 (95% CI 1.4, 14.3) for ICSI, IVF, and GIFT, respectively. The higher frequency of birth defects in ART-conceived twins was still significant after adjusting for higher maternal age in the ART group, with an adjusted odds ratio of 6.7 (95% CI 2.1, 21.9), 3.6 (95% CI 1.1, 11.5), and 3.7 (95% CI 1.2-11.8) for ICSI, IVF, and GIFT, respectively. Dichorionic twins conceived by ART, compared to dichorionic twins conceived naturally, had a much higher risk for birth defects diagnosed at hospital discharge.","PeriodicalId":75270,"journal":{"name":"Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"223 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1375/twin.7.3.223","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twin research : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.7.3.223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine whether dichorionic twins conceived by assisted reproductive technology (ART; intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI], in vitro fertilization [IVF], gameteintrafallopian tube transfer [GIFT]) have a higher risk of birth defects compared to dichorionic twins conceived naturally. We reviewed the medical records of 406 mothers with dichorionic twin pregnancies, who received continuous antenatal care from ≤ 20 weeks of gestation and gave birth to infants after ≥ 24 weeks of gestation in our institute. Birth defects were diagnosed at the time of hospital discharge according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Occurrence of birth defects was compared between twins conceived by ART and those conceived naturally using logistic regression analysis. Overall, 51 of 812 infants (51/812 = 6.2%) had birth defects. The incidence of birth defects in ART-conceived twins was significantly higher than that of naturally conceived twins with an odds ratio of 6.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1, 22.5), 3.7 (95% CI 1.2, 12.0), and 4.3 (95% CI 1.4, 14.3) for ICSI, IVF, and GIFT, respectively. The higher frequency of birth defects in ART-conceived twins was still significant after adjusting for higher maternal age in the ART group, with an adjusted odds ratio of 6.7 (95% CI 2.1, 21.9), 3.6 (95% CI 1.1, 11.5), and 3.7 (95% CI 1.2-11.8) for ICSI, IVF, and GIFT, respectively. Dichorionic twins conceived by ART, compared to dichorionic twins conceived naturally, had a much higher risk for birth defects diagnosed at hospital discharge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助生殖技术孕育双绒毛膜双胞胎出生缺陷的风险
摘要本研究的目的是探讨辅助生殖技术(ART)是否能孕育双绒毛膜双胞胎;与自然受孕的双绒毛膜双胞胎相比,胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)、体外受精(IVF)、配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)有更高的出生缺陷风险。我们回顾了406例双绒毛膜双胎妊娠母亲的医疗记录,这些母亲从妊娠≤20周开始接受持续的产前护理,并在妊娠≥24周后分娩婴儿。出院时根据《国际疾病分类》第十版诊断出生缺陷。采用logistic回归分析比较人工受精与自然受孕双胞胎出生缺陷的发生率。总的来说,812名婴儿中有51名(51/812 = 6.2%)有出生缺陷。IVF、ICSI和GIFT的出生缺陷发生率显著高于自然受孕的双胞胎,比值比分别为6.9(95%可信区间[CI] 2.1, 22.5)、3.7 (95% CI 1.2, 12.0)和4.3 (95% CI 1.4, 14.3)。在对ART组中较高的母亲年龄进行校正后,ART妊娠双胞胎的出生缺陷发生率较高,ICSI、IVF和GIFT的校正优势比分别为6.7 (95% CI 2.1, 21.9)、3.6 (95% CI 1.1, 11.5)和3.7 (95% CI 1.2-11.8)。与自然受孕的双绒毛膜双胞胎相比,通过ART受孕的双绒毛膜双胞胎在出院时被诊断出出生缺陷的风险要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eating behaviors, body image, perfectionism, and self-esteem in a sample of Portuguese girls. The genetic and environmental effects on depressive symptoms among older female twins. Genetic simplex modeling of Eysenck's dimensions of personality in a sample of young Australian twins. Genetic influences on female infidelity and number of sexual partners in humans: a linkage and association study of the role of the vasopressin receptor gene (AVPR1A). Effects of censoring on parameter estimates and power in genetic modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1