Między ratio a emotum. Polsko-rosyjskie postrzeganie wzajemne w perspektywie binarnej

Tomasz Nakoneczny
{"title":"Między ratio a emotum. Polsko-rosyjskie postrzeganie wzajemne w perspektywie binarnej","authors":"Tomasz Nakoneczny","doi":"10.14746/strp.2021.46.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A characteristic feature of Polish-Russian mutual perception is binarity, manifesting itself in various discursive spaces, from colloquial stereotypes, through popular literature, to sophisticated forms of meta-historical discourse. Asian-Europeanness, Latin-Byzantism/Orthodoxy, collectivism-individualism, and authenticity-falsehood, are just some of the oppositions that organise the social imagination of Poles and Russians in the sphere of their mutual assessments and opinions. The article draws attention to the partial manifestations of such oppositions (literary discourse, postcolonial studies, etc.) in order to show their hidden, dialectical dimension. To achieve this goal, the author refers to the category of ratio and emotum, which refers to a specific current of the European philosophical tradition. Both of these binary categories are the foundation for creating an image of the Other. They also fit into self-defining strategies important for understanding Polish and Russian identity.","PeriodicalId":34286,"journal":{"name":"Studia Rossica Posnaniensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Rossica Posnaniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/strp.2021.46.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A characteristic feature of Polish-Russian mutual perception is binarity, manifesting itself in various discursive spaces, from colloquial stereotypes, through popular literature, to sophisticated forms of meta-historical discourse. Asian-Europeanness, Latin-Byzantism/Orthodoxy, collectivism-individualism, and authenticity-falsehood, are just some of the oppositions that organise the social imagination of Poles and Russians in the sphere of their mutual assessments and opinions. The article draws attention to the partial manifestations of such oppositions (literary discourse, postcolonial studies, etc.) in order to show their hidden, dialectical dimension. To achieve this goal, the author refers to the category of ratio and emotum, which refers to a specific current of the European philosophical tradition. Both of these binary categories are the foundation for creating an image of the Other. They also fit into self-defining strategies important for understanding Polish and Russian identity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介于比例和表情之间。二元视角下的波兰-俄罗斯相互认知
波兰-俄罗斯相互感知的一个特征是二元性,它在不同的话语空间中表现出来,从口语化的刻板印象,到通俗文学,再到复杂的元历史话语形式。亚洲-欧洲,拉丁-拜占庭/东正教,集体主义-个人主义,真实性-谬误,这些只是波兰人和俄罗斯人在相互评价和意见的范围内组织社会想象的一些对立。本文关注这些对立的局部表现(文学话语、后殖民研究等),以揭示其隐藏的辩证维度。为了达到这一目的,作者引用了比率和情绪的范畴,这是指欧洲哲学传统的一个特定潮流。这两种二元分类都是创造他者形象的基础。它们也符合自我定义策略,这对理解波兰和俄罗斯的身份认同很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Building through the flames: Polish-Jewish architects and their networks, 1937–1945 „Miasto nigdy się nie kończy…”. Mroczne oblicze miasta w prozie Herty Müller Wilno mityczne we współczesnej prozie litewskiej Soviet savage, stinking cod and Muse – Vladislav Khodasevich’s vision of Saint Petersburg Diabelskie koło historii. Poetyki miejskie w powieści Aleksieja Iwanowa Cienie Teutonów
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1