Core Stabilization Exercise and Movement System Impairment Approaches for Patients with Movement Control Impairment: A Review Article

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2015-12-18 DOI:10.14456/KKURJ.2015.40
Peemongkon Wattananona
{"title":"Core Stabilization Exercise and Movement System Impairment Approaches for Patients with Movement Control Impairment: A Review Article","authors":"Peemongkon Wattananona","doi":"10.14456/KKURJ.2015.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treatment-based and movement system impairment-based classifications have been widely used to identify movement control impairment (MCI) in patients with non-specific low back pain. Clinical observation of aberrant movement patterns is an essential aspect of the examination to identify patients with MCI. The treatment of these patients is a therapeutic exercise that involves static and dynamic stability of core stabilizing muscles. Although exercise prescriptions for these patients are similar, intervention may vary based upon its concept. Interventions include the core stabilization exercise (CSE) approach based upon stabilizing system model, and movement system impairment (MSI) approach based upon kinesiopathologic model. CSE focuses on neuromuscular function to compensate for impairment of intervertebral disc and joints, whereas MSI emphasizes movement correction and enhances movement efficiency to prevent injury and impairment. Both approaches seem equally effective in reducing pain and disability for the MCI group. Therefore, clinicians can utilize either approach for rehabilitating patients with MCI. However, if differences in effectiveness are found when utilizing these different approaches we should explore if the MCI classification needs further definition. In addition, further study needs to investigate the underlying mechanisms in patients with MCI, and the ability of each approach to change those mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":8597,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology","volume":"20 1","pages":"480-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14456/KKURJ.2015.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Treatment-based and movement system impairment-based classifications have been widely used to identify movement control impairment (MCI) in patients with non-specific low back pain. Clinical observation of aberrant movement patterns is an essential aspect of the examination to identify patients with MCI. The treatment of these patients is a therapeutic exercise that involves static and dynamic stability of core stabilizing muscles. Although exercise prescriptions for these patients are similar, intervention may vary based upon its concept. Interventions include the core stabilization exercise (CSE) approach based upon stabilizing system model, and movement system impairment (MSI) approach based upon kinesiopathologic model. CSE focuses on neuromuscular function to compensate for impairment of intervertebral disc and joints, whereas MSI emphasizes movement correction and enhances movement efficiency to prevent injury and impairment. Both approaches seem equally effective in reducing pain and disability for the MCI group. Therefore, clinicians can utilize either approach for rehabilitating patients with MCI. However, if differences in effectiveness are found when utilizing these different approaches we should explore if the MCI classification needs further definition. In addition, further study needs to investigate the underlying mechanisms in patients with MCI, and the ability of each approach to change those mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动控制障碍患者的核心稳定训练和运动系统损伤方法:综述文章
基于治疗和基于运动系统损伤的分类已被广泛用于识别非特异性腰痛患者的运动控制损伤(MCI)。临床观察异常的运动模式是检查的一个重要方面,以确定MCI患者。这些患者的治疗是一种治疗性运动,涉及核心稳定肌肉的静态和动态稳定性。尽管这些患者的运动处方是相似的,但干预措施可能因其概念而异。干预措施包括基于稳定系统模型的核心稳定练习(CSE)方法和基于运动病理学模型的运动系统损伤(MSI)方法。CSE侧重于神经肌肉功能,以补偿椎间盘和关节的损伤,而MSI侧重于运动纠正,提高运动效率,以防止损伤和损伤。这两种方法在减轻轻度认知损伤组的疼痛和残疾方面似乎同样有效。因此,临床医生可以使用任何一种方法来恢复轻度认知损伤患者。然而,如果在使用这些不同的方法时发现有效性差异,我们应该探讨MCI分类是否需要进一步定义。此外,需要进一步研究MCI患者的潜在机制,以及每种方法改变这些机制的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology
Asia-Pacific Journal of Science and Technology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Innovation development of durian stick processing machine for transferring knowledge to foundation community Hybrid analytical and simulation optimization approach for production and distribution supply chain planning Improving efficiency on warehouse management: A case study of beverage company’s distribution center The effects of a yoga training program with fit ball on the physical fitness and body composition of overweight or obese women Pattern of shiftwork and health status among nurses in a university hospital in northeastern Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1