Shelf life extension of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam) storage roots using household-level storage methods

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences International Journal of Postharvest Technology and Innovation Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1504/IJPTI.2017.092450
R. A. Atuna, E. Carey, F. Amagloh
{"title":"Shelf life extension of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam) storage roots using household-level storage methods","authors":"R. A. Atuna, E. Carey, F. Amagloh","doi":"10.1504/IJPTI.2017.092450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three sweetpotato cultivars; OFSP-1, OFSP-2 and WFSP were investigated for storability using two storage methods (heap vs. sand box), following curing (dehaulming, field-piled or no curing). Storage roots (SRs) were subsequently stored using either heap or sand box methods. SRs were deliberately injured and wound healing assessed over a 6-day period. Over an 11 week storage period, OFSP-2 recorded the highest weight loss (9.7%; p = 0.04), weevil damage (3.7%; p = 0.49) and rot (21%; p < 0.001). Weight loss and weevil damage were respectively 1.8-times and 23-times higher in the SRs stored in heap method compared with those in the sand box method. Except for WFSP, the wound healing score increased gradually to the 3rd or 4th day for OFSP-2 and OFSP-1 respectively before levelling off. The sand box method performed better than heap storage should be encouraged for the storage of sweetpotato SRs at the household-level.","PeriodicalId":14399,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Postharvest Technology and Innovation","volume":"5 1","pages":"274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJPTI.2017.092450","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Postharvest Technology and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPTI.2017.092450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three sweetpotato cultivars; OFSP-1, OFSP-2 and WFSP were investigated for storability using two storage methods (heap vs. sand box), following curing (dehaulming, field-piled or no curing). Storage roots (SRs) were subsequently stored using either heap or sand box methods. SRs were deliberately injured and wound healing assessed over a 6-day period. Over an 11 week storage period, OFSP-2 recorded the highest weight loss (9.7%; p = 0.04), weevil damage (3.7%; p = 0.49) and rot (21%; p < 0.001). Weight loss and weevil damage were respectively 1.8-times and 23-times higher in the SRs stored in heap method compared with those in the sand box method. Except for WFSP, the wound healing score increased gradually to the 3rd or 4th day for OFSP-2 and OFSP-1 respectively before levelling off. The sand box method performed better than heap storage should be encouraged for the storage of sweetpotato SRs at the household-level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甘薯(Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam)储存根使用家庭级储存方法的保质期延长
三个甘薯品种;OFSP-1、OFSP-2和WFSP在养护(拆箱、现场堆垛或不养护)后,采用两种储存方法(堆与砂箱)对其储存性进行了研究。存储根(SRs)随后使用堆或沙盒方法进行存储。故意伤害SRs,并在6天内评估伤口愈合情况。在11周的贮藏期内,OFSP-2的失重率最高(9.7%;P = 0.04),象鼻虫危害(3.7%;P = 0.49)和rot (21%;P < 0.001)。堆存法的减重和象甲危害分别是沙箱法的1.8倍和23倍。除WFSP外,OFSP-2和OFSP-1创面愈合评分分别在第3天和第4天逐渐升高,然后趋于平稳。应鼓励采用沙盒法进行地瓜种子的家庭储存,沙盒法的储存效果优于堆储存法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Postharvest Technology and Innovation
International Journal of Postharvest Technology and Innovation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Technology is an increasingly crucial input in the industrialisation and development of nations and communities, particularly in the current era of globalisation, trade liberalisation and emphasis on competitiveness. The shared technologies and innovations of today are giving birth to the radically different agrifood industries and communities of tomorrow. There is mounting evidence that investments in postharvest research and infrastructure yield high rates of return that are comparable and often higher than investments in on-farm production alone.
期刊最新文献
Effect of bio-preservatives and packaging on shelf life and quality of tomatoes Alternaria in apples: the hidden menace Scaling-up urban agriculture for a healthy, sustainable and resilient food system: the postharvest benefits, challenges and key research gaps The effect of wash water chlorine content on the pinking discolouration of fresh cut Iceberg lettuce Impact of ripeness stage and supply chain conditions on quality and bioactive compounds of 'Ambrunés' picota-type sweet cherries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1