Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Sound Field Separation Method under Variations in the Location of the Sampling Points

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Ingenieria Pub Date : 2022-01-04 DOI:10.14483/23448393.18466
Sebastian Lopez Mejia, Andres Felipe Piedrahita Montes
{"title":"Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Sound Field Separation Method under Variations in the Location of the Sampling Points","authors":"Sebastian Lopez Mejia, Andres Felipe Piedrahita Montes","doi":"10.14483/23448393.18466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context:  Measuring the directivity characteristics and the frequency response of acoustic sources is a difficult process, as the dimensions and boundary conditions of the testing rooms used could constrain the measurement procedure. The testing room should guarantee a free-field condition, which is usually satisfied by using big acoustic absorbers with fibrous materials with high absorption coefficients. However, standing wave patterns can be easily developed due to the frequency range exciting the testing room.\nMethod: The sound field separation method can isolate the radiated field of an acoustic source by sampling the sound field around it over two holographic spheres. The coordinates of the sampling points are used in a set of equations, whose solution can estimate the radiated field. In this paper, the effect of the variability on the actual positions of these sampling points is investigated.\nResults: Two numerical simulations with and without external sources outside the holographic spheres were performed. In all simulations, variations in the radial position of the sampling points were induced, and the relative reconstruction error, the directivity index, and the frequency response were studied. The results indicate that, for the estimation of the directivity of low-frequency acoustic sources, regardless of the presence of external sources, radial positioning of the sensors does not have to be exact to obtain an accurate reconstruction.\nConclusions: This study suggests that, in the experimental characterization in conventional testing rooms of the radiated field from acoustic sources whose main frequency region corresponds to low frequencies, e.g. subwoofers, the SFS method could be used, thus obtaining high accuracy in the estimation of the directivity of the source.","PeriodicalId":41509,"journal":{"name":"Ingenieria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ingenieria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.18466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context:  Measuring the directivity characteristics and the frequency response of acoustic sources is a difficult process, as the dimensions and boundary conditions of the testing rooms used could constrain the measurement procedure. The testing room should guarantee a free-field condition, which is usually satisfied by using big acoustic absorbers with fibrous materials with high absorption coefficients. However, standing wave patterns can be easily developed due to the frequency range exciting the testing room. Method: The sound field separation method can isolate the radiated field of an acoustic source by sampling the sound field around it over two holographic spheres. The coordinates of the sampling points are used in a set of equations, whose solution can estimate the radiated field. In this paper, the effect of the variability on the actual positions of these sampling points is investigated. Results: Two numerical simulations with and without external sources outside the holographic spheres were performed. In all simulations, variations in the radial position of the sampling points were induced, and the relative reconstruction error, the directivity index, and the frequency response were studied. The results indicate that, for the estimation of the directivity of low-frequency acoustic sources, regardless of the presence of external sources, radial positioning of the sensors does not have to be exact to obtain an accurate reconstruction. Conclusions: This study suggests that, in the experimental characterization in conventional testing rooms of the radiated field from acoustic sources whose main frequency region corresponds to low frequencies, e.g. subwoofers, the SFS method could be used, thus obtaining high accuracy in the estimation of the directivity of the source.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采样点位置变化下声场分离方法的精度评价
背景:测量声源的指向性特性和频率响应是一个困难的过程,因为所使用的测试室的尺寸和边界条件会限制测量过程。试验室应保证自由场条件,通常采用吸收系数高的纤维材料的大型吸声器来满足这一要求。然而,由于激发测试室的频率范围,可以很容易地开发驻波模式。方法:声场分离法通过在两个全息球上采样声源周围的声场来隔离声源的辐射场。采样点的坐标被用在一组方程中,其解可以估计辐射场。本文研究了变异性对这些采样点实际位置的影响。结果:分别进行了全息球外有外源和无外源两种情况下的数值模拟。在所有模拟中,诱导了采样点径向位置的变化,并研究了相对重建误差、指向性指数和频率响应。结果表明,对于低频声源的指向性估计,无论是否存在外部声源,传感器的径向定位不必精确,即可获得准确的重建。结论:本研究表明,在传统测试室内对低频声源(如低音炮)的辐射场进行实验表征时,可以采用SFS方法,从而获得较高的声源指向性估计精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ingenieria
Ingenieria ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Boost and Hybrid Boost Converters Defending State-Feedback Based Controllers Against Sensor Attacks Evaluación de riesgos (ER) en un terminal de buques tanqueros, basada en la norma ISO-31000:2018 y técnicas cuali-cuantitativas A Model for Documenting Requirements Elicitation Caracterización mecánica de mezclas de caucho natural y residuos de celulosa originados en la industria automotriz con enfoque en el sector del calzado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1