The Early Franciscan Doctrine of the Knowledge of God: Between Augustine’s Authority and Innovation

L. Schumacher
{"title":"The Early Franciscan Doctrine of the Knowledge of God: Between Augustine’s Authority and Innovation","authors":"L. Schumacher","doi":"10.1484/J.TMJ.5.110978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collaboratively authored Summa Halensis is widely regarded as the first attempt to articulate a distinctly Franciscan intellectual tradition. This paper will examine one of its initial sections, on the knowledge of God, which lays the conceptual foundation for the rest of the work. While the Summa, like most scholastic texts, invokes many authoritative sources in this context, it gives pride of place to the work of Augustine. Nevertheless, it employs Augustine’s thought inconsistently, to argue both for and against the same position. On this basis, the paper will seek to elucidate the method whereby scholastic thinkers manipulated authoritative sources for their own ends. By the same token, it will demonstrate that the Summa’s authors, far from attempting to ‘systematize’ the thought of Augustine as some have supposed, were engaged in an effort to develop an innovative tradition of their own, which reflected their unique spiritual and ministerial vision as Franciscans.","PeriodicalId":91625,"journal":{"name":"The Mediaeval journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Mediaeval journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1484/J.TMJ.5.110978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The collaboratively authored Summa Halensis is widely regarded as the first attempt to articulate a distinctly Franciscan intellectual tradition. This paper will examine one of its initial sections, on the knowledge of God, which lays the conceptual foundation for the rest of the work. While the Summa, like most scholastic texts, invokes many authoritative sources in this context, it gives pride of place to the work of Augustine. Nevertheless, it employs Augustine’s thought inconsistently, to argue both for and against the same position. On this basis, the paper will seek to elucidate the method whereby scholastic thinkers manipulated authoritative sources for their own ends. By the same token, it will demonstrate that the Summa’s authors, far from attempting to ‘systematize’ the thought of Augustine as some have supposed, were engaged in an effort to develop an innovative tradition of their own, which reflected their unique spiritual and ministerial vision as Franciscans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期方济会的上帝知识学说:介于奥古斯丁的权威与创新之间
合作撰写的总结Halensis被广泛认为是第一次尝试阐明一个明显的方济各会的知识传统。本文将研究其最初的一个部分,关于上帝的知识,这为其余的工作奠定了概念基础。而总结,像大多数学术文本,援引许多权威来源在这方面,它给奥古斯丁的工作的骄傲地位。然而,它不一致地采用奥古斯丁的思想,以支持和反对同一立场。在此基础上,本文将试图阐明学术思想家为达到自己的目的而操纵权威来源的方法。出于同样的原因,它将证明,总结的作者,远没有试图“系统化”奥古斯丁的思想,有些人认为,是在努力发展自己的创新传统,这反映了他们独特的精神和部长的愿景作为方济各会士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sethina Watson, On Hospitals: Welfare Law, and Christianity in Western Europe, 400–1320 A Middle English Version of the Circa Instans, Edited from Cambridge, CUL, MS Ee.1.13, ed. by Edurne Garrido-Anes Christian Cooijmans, Monarchs and Hydrarchs: The Conceptual Development of Viking Activity across the Frankish Realm (c. 750–940) Ben Parsons, Punishment and Medieval Education Gregory I. Halfond, Bishops and the Politics of Patronage in Merovingian Gaul
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1