FRIVOLOUS SUITS IN THE INFINITELY-REPEATED LITIGATION GAME WITH UNCERTAINTY

IF 0.2 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics Pub Date : 2015-06-01 DOI:10.15057/27196
Iljoong Kim, Jaehong Kim
{"title":"FRIVOLOUS SUITS IN THE INFINITELY-REPEATED LITIGATION GAME WITH UNCERTAINTY","authors":"Iljoong Kim, Jaehong Kim","doi":"10.15057/27196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explain why 'frivolous suits (FS)' occur particularly under complete information. Existing analyses such as the 'traditional' and the 'early-defense-cost' models are not fully robust in that they either drop the plaintiff's withdrawal option or rely on a restrictive assumption that the defendant loses immediately unless he early defends himself at high cost. We pursue a more generalized explanation. We offer an infinite-period litigation model with uncertainty which reflects the reality more consistently. We then show that FS can occur as a subgame perfect equilibrium since the defendant over the pre-trial stage may settle with FS to save future time and/or trial costs. We further demonstrate that FS can occur even under the British rule of fee shifting.","PeriodicalId":43705,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics","volume":"31 3 1","pages":"21-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/27196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We explain why 'frivolous suits (FS)' occur particularly under complete information. Existing analyses such as the 'traditional' and the 'early-defense-cost' models are not fully robust in that they either drop the plaintiff's withdrawal option or rely on a restrictive assumption that the defendant loses immediately unless he early defends himself at high cost. We pursue a more generalized explanation. We offer an infinite-period litigation model with uncertainty which reflects the reality more consistently. We then show that FS can occur as a subgame perfect equilibrium since the defendant over the pre-trial stage may settle with FS to save future time and/or trial costs. We further demonstrate that FS can occur even under the British rule of fee shifting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不确定的无限重复的诉讼游戏中,琐碎的诉讼
我们解释了为什么“轻浮诉讼”在信息完备的情况下特别容易发生。现有的分析,如“传统”和“早期辩护成本”模型并不完全可靠,因为它们要么放弃原告的撤回选择,要么依赖于一个限制性假设,即被告立即败诉,除非他以高成本提前为自己辩护。我们寻求一个更广义的解释。我们提出了一个具有不确定性的无限期限诉讼模型,该模型更符合实际情况。然后,我们表明,由于被告在预审阶段可能会与FS达成和解,以节省未来的时间和/或审判成本,因此FS可以作为子博弈的完美均衡发生。我们进一步证明,即使在英国收费转移规则下,FS也可能发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Floating population and demand for movie theaters in metropolitan cities Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Duopoly with Vertically Related Markets Impact of Outgrower Scheme on Yield,Output Price,and Income: A Rice-Farm-Level Study in the Mekong Delta,Vietnam Business Services,Trade,and Research Intensity Religion and Corporate Disclosure Quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1