RATTAN DIVERSITY AND BROAD EDAPHIC NICHES IN A TROPICAL RAINFOREST OF BUTON, SULAWESI, INDONESIA

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Reinwardtia Pub Date : 2016-12-22 DOI:10.14203/REINWARDTIA.V15I2.2943
R. Pritchett, A. Phillips, A. Mardiastuti, A. Powling
{"title":"RATTAN DIVERSITY AND BROAD EDAPHIC NICHES IN A TROPICAL RAINFOREST OF BUTON, SULAWESI, INDONESIA","authors":"R. Pritchett, A. Phillips, A. Mardiastuti, A. Powling","doi":"10.14203/REINWARDTIA.V15I2.2943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PRITCHETT, R., PHILLIPS, A., MARDIASTUTI, A. & POWLING, A. 2016. Rattan diversity and broad edaphic niches in a tropical rainforest of Buton, Sulawesi, Indonesia. Reinwardtia 15(2): 99 – 110. — This paper attempts to answer the question: how can at least 20 species of rattan palms in the genus Calamus (family Palmae (Arecaceae)) co -exist in a rainforest? A survey of rattans was made in Lambusango Forest on Buton, an island close to south east Sulawesi, in Indonesia. Rattan species and numbers were recorded in 87 quadrats of 30 × 10 m, laid out along linear transects in habitats with a variety of soils. Evidence for edaphic (soil) niches was sought. Different rattan species were found to be adapted to soils with different conductivity and pH values. Standardised mean difference (d) scores were calculated for pairs of species based on their response to soil pH. Of the 66 pairs tested, 61 were found to be significantly different statistically. Such differences suggest, but do not prove, that many species occupy different edaphic niches. It was found that species which show a preference for soils with intermediate pH values (5.0 to 6.5) can grow in soils with a wide range of pH values, implying broad edaphic niches and that competition between these species is weak. Correspondence analysis shows that many species do not distinguish greatly between many soils with intermediate pH values. It is concluded that rattan species show evidence for having different edaphic niches, although the niches for many species are broad. It is speculated that many rattan species may be ecologically equivalent and that a weak version of ecological neutrality theory may apply.","PeriodicalId":52340,"journal":{"name":"Reinwardtia","volume":"15 1","pages":"99-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reinwardtia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14203/REINWARDTIA.V15I2.2943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PRITCHETT, R., PHILLIPS, A., MARDIASTUTI, A. & POWLING, A. 2016. Rattan diversity and broad edaphic niches in a tropical rainforest of Buton, Sulawesi, Indonesia. Reinwardtia 15(2): 99 – 110. — This paper attempts to answer the question: how can at least 20 species of rattan palms in the genus Calamus (family Palmae (Arecaceae)) co -exist in a rainforest? A survey of rattans was made in Lambusango Forest on Buton, an island close to south east Sulawesi, in Indonesia. Rattan species and numbers were recorded in 87 quadrats of 30 × 10 m, laid out along linear transects in habitats with a variety of soils. Evidence for edaphic (soil) niches was sought. Different rattan species were found to be adapted to soils with different conductivity and pH values. Standardised mean difference (d) scores were calculated for pairs of species based on their response to soil pH. Of the 66 pairs tested, 61 were found to be significantly different statistically. Such differences suggest, but do not prove, that many species occupy different edaphic niches. It was found that species which show a preference for soils with intermediate pH values (5.0 to 6.5) can grow in soils with a wide range of pH values, implying broad edaphic niches and that competition between these species is weak. Correspondence analysis shows that many species do not distinguish greatly between many soils with intermediate pH values. It is concluded that rattan species show evidence for having different edaphic niches, although the niches for many species are broad. It is speculated that many rattan species may be ecologically equivalent and that a weak version of ecological neutrality theory may apply.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚苏拉威西岛布顿热带雨林中的藤类多样性和广阔的地理生态位
普里切特,r .,菲利普斯,a .,马迪阿斯图蒂,a .和鲍林,a . 2016。印度尼西亚苏拉威西岛布顿热带雨林中的藤类多样性和广阔的地理生态位。Reinwardtia 15(2): 99 - 110。这篇论文试图回答这样一个问题:至少20种菖蒲属(棕榈科)的藤本棕榈是如何在雨林中共存的?在印度尼西亚靠近苏拉威西岛东南部的布顿岛的兰布桑戈森林对藤蔓进行了调查。在不同土壤生境中,沿线性样带布置的87个样方(30 × 10 m)上记录了藤本植物的种类和数量。寻找土壤生态位的证据。不同藤种对不同电导率和pH值的土壤有不同的适应性。根据不同物种对土壤ph的响应,计算了它们的标准化平均差值(d)得分。在66对被测物种中,有61对在统计学上有显著差异。这些差异表明,但不能证明,许多物种占据着不同的生态位。结果表明,对中等pH值(5.0 ~ 6.5)土壤表现出偏好的物种可以在pH值范围较宽的土壤中生长,这表明土壤生态位范围较广,物种间的竞争较弱。对应分析表明,许多物种在许多中等pH值的土壤中没有很大的区别。结果表明,藤本植物具有不同的生态位,但许多藤本植物的生态位范围较广。据推测,许多藤类物种可能是生态等效的,一个弱版本的生态中性理论可能适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reinwardtia
Reinwardtia Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
COMPARATIVE LEAF ANATOMY AND MICROMORPHOLOGY OF ASYSTASIA GANGETICA T.ANDERSON SUBSP. MICRANTHA (NEES) ENSERMU AND RHINACANTHUS NASUTUS (L.) KURZ (JUSTICIINAE, ACANTHACEAE) FROM PENINSULAR MALAYSIA PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE POLLEN MORPHOLOGY OF MALAYSIAN ZINGIBERACEAE (TRIBE ALPINIEAE) AND THE TAXONOMIC RELATIONSHIP COMPARATIVE MICROMORPHOLOGY LEAF SURFACE OF SELECTED HOYA SPP. (APOCYNACEAE) FROM SARAWAK NEPENTHES CALCICOLA (NEPENTHACEAE), A NEW PITCHER PLANT FROM GULF PROVINCE, PAPUA NEW GUINEA MOLECULAR AND MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS SUPPORTS THE TRANSFER OF THE MONOTYPIC INDONESIAN GENUS SEPTOGARCINIA KOSTERM. TO GARCINIA (CLUSIACEAE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1