Introduction: Histories of Mobility, Histories of Labor, Histories of Africa

IF 0.7 4区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY Pub Date : 2016-11-16 DOI:10.1353/AEH.2016.0000
Zachary Kagan Guthrie
{"title":"Introduction: Histories of Mobility, Histories of Labor, Histories of Africa","authors":"Zachary Kagan Guthrie","doi":"10.1353/AEH.2016.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Migrant labor is one of the most extensively studied subjects of Africa's colonial history, helping to inaugurate the professional study of Africa in multiple academic disciplines. Anthropologists in the 1940s, working to outline the impact of colonial rule, used migrant labor to demonstrate the changes occurring within African societies previously considered immunized by \"tradition\" against major social change. Economists in the 1950s and 1960s, seeking to gauge the prospects of economic transformation in Africa, examined migrant labor between the \"traditional\" and \"modern\" sectors of the economy in order to divine what future changes in the balance between these two putatively separate economic spheres might follow from increased investment under colonial and then post-colonial development schemes. Scholars of African politics and society in the era of independence used migrant labor to examine the relationship between states and citizens in newly independent countries, as well as to forecast how this relationship would continue to evolve following the end of colonial rule.Migrant labor was also an important subject for the first professional historians of Africa. Just as the anthropologists who inaugurated the professional study of Africa used migrant labor as an indisputable marker of cultural dynamism, so too could historians use migrant labor as an indisputable marker of diachronic change. The historical study of migrant labor took some time to develop, as the first wave of historians of Africa were predominantly interested in researching precolonial Africa, so as to establish an authentically African past for the emerging postcolonial future. During the 1970s and 1980s, however, increased historical interest in studying colonial rule brought a rapid proliferation of migrant labor histories, diffused through a confluence of closely related historiographical strands.1 One was the focus on African workers as key actors in challenging and ultimately overcoming colonial rule, and a potential force for ushering postcolonial Africa further along the path toward modernity.2 Another was the animated debates, inspired by underdevelopment theory, over Africa's historical relationship with global capitalism.3 Still another was the equally animated debates over the role of material relations in shaping African societies, as well as the proper analytical framework (or mode of production) through which these relations ought to be categorized and understood.4 Hovering over these historiographical nodes was the reigning paradigm of social history, in which economic relationships were understood to be the primary driver of historical change, and to offer the most perceptive lens into the broader arc of history's march toward the present.Migrant labor was well-positioned to feature prominently in all of these historiographies. For labor historians, migrant workers presented a discrete group of individuals whose actions-protests, evasion, strikes, and so on-could be clearly catalogued as an example of the interlocking dynamics of structure and agency as workers confronted the onset of colonial rule.5 For economic historians, migrant laborers instantiated the changes wrought by colonial rule in a particularly vivid way, as the dramatic rise of migrant wage labor-especially in eastern and southern Africa-made clear the scale of the transformations inaugurated by colonial capitalism.6 For historians participating in debates over African modes of production, migrant laborers' movement between work and home made it possible to extend critical analyses of capitalist transformation and its attendant models into regions that had not been previously subjected to rigorous materialist analysis, having instead been considered largely unaffected by such transformations, owing to the fact that capitalist enterprises in many parts of colonial Africa were limited in number and geographically concentrated into a few limited areas.7In the late 1980s and 1990s, however, the previously vibrant historiography of migrant labor entered into significant decline. …","PeriodicalId":43935,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/AEH.2016.0000","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/AEH.2016.0000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Migrant labor is one of the most extensively studied subjects of Africa's colonial history, helping to inaugurate the professional study of Africa in multiple academic disciplines. Anthropologists in the 1940s, working to outline the impact of colonial rule, used migrant labor to demonstrate the changes occurring within African societies previously considered immunized by "tradition" against major social change. Economists in the 1950s and 1960s, seeking to gauge the prospects of economic transformation in Africa, examined migrant labor between the "traditional" and "modern" sectors of the economy in order to divine what future changes in the balance between these two putatively separate economic spheres might follow from increased investment under colonial and then post-colonial development schemes. Scholars of African politics and society in the era of independence used migrant labor to examine the relationship between states and citizens in newly independent countries, as well as to forecast how this relationship would continue to evolve following the end of colonial rule.Migrant labor was also an important subject for the first professional historians of Africa. Just as the anthropologists who inaugurated the professional study of Africa used migrant labor as an indisputable marker of cultural dynamism, so too could historians use migrant labor as an indisputable marker of diachronic change. The historical study of migrant labor took some time to develop, as the first wave of historians of Africa were predominantly interested in researching precolonial Africa, so as to establish an authentically African past for the emerging postcolonial future. During the 1970s and 1980s, however, increased historical interest in studying colonial rule brought a rapid proliferation of migrant labor histories, diffused through a confluence of closely related historiographical strands.1 One was the focus on African workers as key actors in challenging and ultimately overcoming colonial rule, and a potential force for ushering postcolonial Africa further along the path toward modernity.2 Another was the animated debates, inspired by underdevelopment theory, over Africa's historical relationship with global capitalism.3 Still another was the equally animated debates over the role of material relations in shaping African societies, as well as the proper analytical framework (or mode of production) through which these relations ought to be categorized and understood.4 Hovering over these historiographical nodes was the reigning paradigm of social history, in which economic relationships were understood to be the primary driver of historical change, and to offer the most perceptive lens into the broader arc of history's march toward the present.Migrant labor was well-positioned to feature prominently in all of these historiographies. For labor historians, migrant workers presented a discrete group of individuals whose actions-protests, evasion, strikes, and so on-could be clearly catalogued as an example of the interlocking dynamics of structure and agency as workers confronted the onset of colonial rule.5 For economic historians, migrant laborers instantiated the changes wrought by colonial rule in a particularly vivid way, as the dramatic rise of migrant wage labor-especially in eastern and southern Africa-made clear the scale of the transformations inaugurated by colonial capitalism.6 For historians participating in debates over African modes of production, migrant laborers' movement between work and home made it possible to extend critical analyses of capitalist transformation and its attendant models into regions that had not been previously subjected to rigorous materialist analysis, having instead been considered largely unaffected by such transformations, owing to the fact that capitalist enterprises in many parts of colonial Africa were limited in number and geographically concentrated into a few limited areas.7In the late 1980s and 1990s, however, the previously vibrant historiography of migrant labor entered into significant decline. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导论:流动史、劳工史、非洲史
移民劳工是非洲殖民史上研究最广泛的课题之一,开创了多学科对非洲的专业研究。20世纪40年代,人类学家试图勾勒出殖民统治的影响,他们利用移民劳工来证明非洲社会内部发生的变化,这些变化以前被认为是由“传统”对重大社会变革免疫的。20世纪50年代和60年代的经济学家们试图评估非洲经济转型的前景,研究了“传统”和“现代”经济部门之间的移民劳动力,以预测在殖民时期和后殖民时期发展计划下增加投资可能会导致这两个假定独立的经济领域之间的平衡未来发生什么变化。研究独立时期非洲政治和社会的学者利用移民劳工来研究新独立国家中国家与公民之间的关系,并预测这种关系在殖民统治结束后将如何继续演变。对于非洲第一批专业历史学家来说,移民劳工也是一个重要的主题。正如开创非洲专业研究的人类学家将移民劳工作为文化活力的无可争议的标志一样,历史学家也可以将移民劳工作为历时变化的无可争议的标志。对移民劳工的历史研究需要一段时间才能发展起来,因为第一波非洲历史学家主要对研究前殖民时期的非洲感兴趣,以便为新兴的后殖民时期的未来建立一个真实的非洲过去。然而,在20世纪70年代和80年代,对研究殖民统治的历史兴趣的增加带来了移民劳工历史的迅速扩散,通过密切相关的史学流派的融合而扩散一是关注非洲工人作为挑战并最终克服殖民统治的关键角色,以及引领后殖民非洲进一步走向现代化的潜在力量另一个是在欠发达理论的启发下,围绕非洲与全球资本主义的历史关系展开了激烈的辩论还有一个是关于物质关系在塑造非洲社会中的作用的同样激烈的辩论,以及通过这些关系应该被分类和理解的适当的分析框架(或生产方式)盘旋在这些史学节点之上的是社会历史的主导范式,在这种范式中,经济关系被理解为历史变化的主要驱动力,并提供了最敏锐的视角来观察历史走向当前的更广阔弧线。移民劳工在所有这些历史著作中都占据了重要地位。对于劳工历史学家来说,移民工人是一个离散的个体群体,他们的行动——抗议、逃避、罢工等等——可以被清楚地归类为工人面对殖民统治时结构和代理的连锁动力的一个例子对于经济历史学家来说,移民劳工以一种特别生动的方式体现了殖民统治所造成的变化,因为移民雇佣劳动力的急剧增长——尤其是在非洲东部和南部——清楚地表明了殖民资本主义所开启的变革的规模对于参与非洲生产方式辩论的历史学家来说,移民工人在工作和家庭之间的流动使得对资本主义转型及其伴随模式的批判性分析有可能扩展到以前没有受到严格唯物主义分析的地区,相反,这些地区被认为在很大程度上没有受到这种转变的影响。因为在殖民地非洲的许多地方,资本主义企业数量有限,而且在地理上集中在少数几个有限的地区。然而,在20世纪80年代末和90年代,以前充满活力的移民劳工史学进入了显著的衰退。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gendered Labor Relations in Colonial and Post-Colonial Eritrea The "Global Collaboratory on the History of Labour Relations": Putting Women's Labor and Labor Relations in Sub-Saharan Africa in a Global Context Women's Labor Relations in Sub-Saharan Africa and The Global South Compared, 1800–2000 Introduction From Subsistence Farmers To Guardians of Food Security and Well-Being: Shifts and Continuities in Female Labor Relations in Tanzania (1800–2000)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1