Revisiting innovation practices in subsistence farming: the net effects of land management, pesticide, herbicide and fungicide practices on expected crop harvest in Ethiopia

A. Onjewu, Vahid Jafari Sadeghi, S. Hussain
{"title":"Revisiting innovation practices in subsistence farming: the net effects of land management, pesticide, herbicide and fungicide practices on expected crop harvest in Ethiopia","authors":"A. Onjewu, Vahid Jafari Sadeghi, S. Hussain","doi":"10.1504/ijtlid.2022.10045687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To settle inconsistent findings in the farming innovation and productivity nexus, this inquiry examines the land management practices of 7,625 households in rural Ethiopia. Specifically, the net effects of (1) improved seeds, (2) mixed cropping and (3) row planting on the use of (4) pesticides, (5) herbicides and (6) fungicides are assessed. Using a structural equation technique, the study probes how these six practices predict households’ expected harvest. It is found that while improved seeds increase pesticide, herbicide and fungicide use, mixed cropping and row planting generally reduce these practices. Moreover, mixed cropping moderately increases expected harvest while improved seeds and row planting have the reverse effect. The interrelations of these factors increase knowledge in contingency-driven agronomics, and provoke reflection on the sustainability of land management practices. Particularly, opposed to prevailing views, it is demonstrated that sowing traditional seeds will reduce households’ reliance on pesticides, herbicides and fungicides. The inherent findings speak to policy-makers tasked with supporting peasant life in rural Ethiopia and similar contexts.","PeriodicalId":38847,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtlid.2022.10045687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

To settle inconsistent findings in the farming innovation and productivity nexus, this inquiry examines the land management practices of 7,625 households in rural Ethiopia. Specifically, the net effects of (1) improved seeds, (2) mixed cropping and (3) row planting on the use of (4) pesticides, (5) herbicides and (6) fungicides are assessed. Using a structural equation technique, the study probes how these six practices predict households’ expected harvest. It is found that while improved seeds increase pesticide, herbicide and fungicide use, mixed cropping and row planting generally reduce these practices. Moreover, mixed cropping moderately increases expected harvest while improved seeds and row planting have the reverse effect. The interrelations of these factors increase knowledge in contingency-driven agronomics, and provoke reflection on the sustainability of land management practices. Particularly, opposed to prevailing views, it is demonstrated that sowing traditional seeds will reduce households’ reliance on pesticides, herbicides and fungicides. The inherent findings speak to policy-makers tasked with supporting peasant life in rural Ethiopia and similar contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视自给农业的创新实践:土地管理、农药、除草剂和杀菌剂做法对埃塞俄比亚作物预期收成的净影响
为了解决农业创新和生产力关系中不一致的发现,本调查调查了埃塞俄比亚农村7625户家庭的土地管理实践。具体而言,评估了(1)改良种子、(2)混合种植和(3)行种植对(4)农药、(5)除草剂和(6)杀菌剂使用的净效应。利用结构方程技术,研究了这六种做法如何预测家庭的预期收成。研究发现,虽然改良种子增加了农药、除草剂和杀菌剂的使用,但混作和行栽一般会减少这些做法。此外,混合种植适度增加预期收成,而改良种子和行栽则有相反的效果。这些因素之间的相互关系增加了对突发事件驱动的农学的认识,并引发了对土地管理实践可持续性的反思。特别是,与流行的观点相反,研究表明,播种传统种子将减少家庭对杀虫剂、除草剂和杀菌剂的依赖。这些内在的发现对负责支持埃塞俄比亚农村和类似情况下农民生活的政策制定者有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Gamification Strengthens Behavioral Intention to Motivate Customer’s Loyalty towards Using E-banking and E-wallets on Gen Z Mapping the Landscape of Research on Knowledge Workers: A Bibliometric Review The Influence of Institutional Resources on Doctorate Degree Enrolment and Completion Rates in Selected Public Universities Kenya Strategies Used in EFL Reading Comprehension: The Case Study of Seven Chinese High School Students Teaching in Digital Age: College of Education Students and in-Service Teachers’ Confidence in Integrating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in their Educational Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1