Bioethical Guidelines: A "Global" Overview

S. Semplici
{"title":"Bioethical Guidelines: A \"Global\" Overview","authors":"S. Semplici","doi":"10.1515/1941-6008.1175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract «The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely necessary». The first sentence of the Nuremberg Code still builds the fundamental bulwark of the Ethics of Biomedical Research. Nonetheless, later declarations, codes and guidelines have deepened and widened this imperative of respect for autonomy and self-determination, either pointing at the conditions required for an actually free and informed consent or linking it to the more comprehensive scope of human rights. This short paper explores these concepts.","PeriodicalId":88318,"journal":{"name":"Studies in ethics, law, and technology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/1941-6008.1175","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in ethics, law, and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/1941-6008.1175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract «The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely necessary». The first sentence of the Nuremberg Code still builds the fundamental bulwark of the Ethics of Biomedical Research. Nonetheless, later declarations, codes and guidelines have deepened and widened this imperative of respect for autonomy and self-determination, either pointing at the conditions required for an actually free and informed consent or linking it to the more comprehensive scope of human rights. This short paper explores these concepts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物伦理准则:“全球”概览
摘要:人类主体的自愿同意是绝对必要的。《纽伦堡法典》的第一句话仍然构筑着生物医学研究伦理的基本堡垒。然而,后来的宣言、守则和准则加深和扩大了尊重自治和自决的必要性,指出了真正自由和知情同意所需的条件,或将其与更全面的人权范围联系起来。这篇短文探讨了这些概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Political Legitimacy Review of Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age Review of Interfaces on Trial 2.0 From ICH to IBH in Biobanking? A Legal Perspective on Harmonization, Standardization and Unification The Price of Precaution and the Ethics of Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1