Palliative care training and associations with burnout in oncology fellows.

S. Mougalian, D. Lessen, R. Levine, G. Panagopoulos, J. V. Von Roenn, R. Arnold, S. Block, M. Buss
{"title":"Palliative care training and associations with burnout in oncology fellows.","authors":"S. Mougalian, D. Lessen, R. Levine, G. Panagopoulos, J. V. Von Roenn, R. Arnold, S. Block, M. Buss","doi":"10.12788/J.SUPONC.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nBurnout among physicians can lead to decreased career satisfaction, physical and emotional exhaustion, and increased medical errors. In oncologists, high exposure to fatal illness is associated with burnout.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe Maslach Burnout Inventory, measuring Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP), and Personal Accomplishment (PA), was administered to second-year US oncology fellows. Bivariate and multivariate analyses explored associations between burnout and fellow demographics, attitudes, and educational experiences.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 254 fellows out of 402 eligible US fellows responded (63.2%) and 24.2% reported high EE, 30.0% reported high DP, and 26.8% reported low PA. Over half of the fellows reported burnout in at least one domain. Lower EE scores were associated with the fellows' perceptions of having received better teaching, explicit teaching about certain end-of-life topics, and receipt of direct observation of goals-of-care discussions. Fellows who reported better overall teaching quality and more frequent observation of their skills had less depersonalization. Fellows who felt a responsibility to help patients at the end of life to prepare for death had higher PA.\n\n\nLIMITATIONS\nThis survey relies on the fellows' self-reported perceptions without an objective measure for validation. Factors associated with burnout may not be causal. The number of analyses performed raises the concern for Type I errors; therefore, a stringent P value (0.01) was used.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nBurnout is prevalent during oncology training. Higher-quality teaching is associated with less burnout among fellows. Fellowship programs should recognize the prevalence of burnout among oncology fellows as well as components of training that may protect against burnout.","PeriodicalId":75116,"journal":{"name":"The journal of supportive oncology","volume":"11 2 1","pages":"95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/J.SUPONC.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

BACKGROUND Burnout among physicians can lead to decreased career satisfaction, physical and emotional exhaustion, and increased medical errors. In oncologists, high exposure to fatal illness is associated with burnout. METHODS The Maslach Burnout Inventory, measuring Emotional Exhaustion (EE), Depersonalization (DP), and Personal Accomplishment (PA), was administered to second-year US oncology fellows. Bivariate and multivariate analyses explored associations between burnout and fellow demographics, attitudes, and educational experiences. RESULTS A total of 254 fellows out of 402 eligible US fellows responded (63.2%) and 24.2% reported high EE, 30.0% reported high DP, and 26.8% reported low PA. Over half of the fellows reported burnout in at least one domain. Lower EE scores were associated with the fellows' perceptions of having received better teaching, explicit teaching about certain end-of-life topics, and receipt of direct observation of goals-of-care discussions. Fellows who reported better overall teaching quality and more frequent observation of their skills had less depersonalization. Fellows who felt a responsibility to help patients at the end of life to prepare for death had higher PA. LIMITATIONS This survey relies on the fellows' self-reported perceptions without an objective measure for validation. Factors associated with burnout may not be causal. The number of analyses performed raises the concern for Type I errors; therefore, a stringent P value (0.01) was used. CONCLUSIONS Burnout is prevalent during oncology training. Higher-quality teaching is associated with less burnout among fellows. Fellowship programs should recognize the prevalence of burnout among oncology fellows as well as components of training that may protect against burnout.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
姑息治疗培训及其与肿瘤研究员职业倦怠的关系。
背景医生的职业倦怠会导致职业满意度下降,身心疲惫,医疗事故增加。在肿瘤学家中,高剂量接触致命疾病与职业倦怠有关。方法采用马斯拉克倦怠量表(Maslach Burnout Inventory)测量情绪耗竭(EE)、人格解体(DP)和个人成就感(PA)。双变量和多变量分析探讨了职业倦怠与同伴人口统计、态度和教育经历之间的关系。结果402名符合条件的美国研究人员中有254名(63.2%)有反应,24.2%报告高EE, 30.0%报告高DP, 26.8%报告低PA。超过一半的研究员报告说,他们至少在一个领域感到倦怠。较低的情感表达得分与受试者认为接受了更好的教学、对某些临终主题进行了明确的教学以及接受了对护理目标讨论的直接观察有关。报告整体教学质量更好、更频繁观察自己技能的研究员人格解体的情况更少。那些感到有责任帮助临终病人为死亡做准备的研究员的PA更高。局限性:这项调查依赖于研究员的自我报告,没有客观的测量方法来验证。与倦怠相关的因素可能不是因果关系。执行的分析数量引起了对第一类错误的关注;因此,采用严格的P值(0.01)。结论职业倦怠在肿瘤培训中普遍存在。更高质量的教学与更少的学生倦怠有关。奖学金项目应该认识到肿瘤研究员中职业倦怠的普遍性,以及可能防止职业倦怠的培训组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring the quality of palliative care and supportive oncology: principles and practice. Illness perceptions matter: understanding quality of life and advanced illness behaviors in female patients with late-stage cancer. Monitoring of health-related quality of life and symptoms in prostate cancer survivors: a randomized trial. Characterization of skin reactions and pain reported by patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer at different sites. Whole brain radiotherapy for poor prognosis patients with brain metastases: predictably poor results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1