FDI inflows, energy consumption and sustainable economic growth for ECOWAS countries: the pollution haven hypothesis approach

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Journal of Green Economics Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1504/ijge.2020.10034342
Ahmed Malumfashi Halliru, Nanthakumar Loganathan, N. Sethi, A. G. Hassan
{"title":"FDI inflows, energy consumption and sustainable economic growth for ECOWAS countries: the pollution haven hypothesis approach","authors":"Ahmed Malumfashi Halliru, Nanthakumar Loganathan, N. Sethi, A. G. Hassan","doi":"10.1504/ijge.2020.10034342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the pollution haven hypothesis for CO2 emissions and ecological footprint with the role of sustainable economic growth, energy consumption, human capital and bio-capacity in six ECOWAS countries using data spanning over 1970 until 2017. Employing a Pooled Mean Group (PMG) technique, the empirical results support the pollution halo hypothesis for CO2 emissions and Pollution Haven Hypothesis (PHH) for ecological footprint. Furthermore, we found evidence of inverted U-shaped pattern of CO2 emissions, which validate the EKC hypothesis, but a U-shaped relationship was found for ecological footprint as indicators of environmental degradation. A unidirectional causal link exists between FDI and CO2 emissions, but a feedback hypothesis is validated between FDI and ecological footprint. The policy implications are that environmentally friendly FDI should be prioritised to achieve a sustainable environment via developing renewable energy.","PeriodicalId":35060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Green Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Green Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijge.2020.10034342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This study examined the pollution haven hypothesis for CO2 emissions and ecological footprint with the role of sustainable economic growth, energy consumption, human capital and bio-capacity in six ECOWAS countries using data spanning over 1970 until 2017. Employing a Pooled Mean Group (PMG) technique, the empirical results support the pollution halo hypothesis for CO2 emissions and Pollution Haven Hypothesis (PHH) for ecological footprint. Furthermore, we found evidence of inverted U-shaped pattern of CO2 emissions, which validate the EKC hypothesis, but a U-shaped relationship was found for ecological footprint as indicators of environmental degradation. A unidirectional causal link exists between FDI and CO2 emissions, but a feedback hypothesis is validated between FDI and ecological footprint. The policy implications are that environmentally friendly FDI should be prioritised to achieve a sustainable environment via developing renewable energy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西非经共体国家的外国直接投资流入、能源消费和可持续经济增长:污染避风港假说方法
本研究利用1970年至2017年的数据,检验了六个西非经共体国家的二氧化碳排放和生态足迹的污染避风港假说,以及可持续经济增长、能源消耗、人力资本和生物容量的作用。采用PMG (Pooled Mean Group)方法,实证结果支持CO2排放的污染晕假说和生态足迹的污染避风港假说。此外,我们还发现了二氧化碳排放呈倒u型分布的证据,这证实了EKC假设,但生态足迹作为环境退化指标呈u型关系。FDI与CO2排放之间存在单向因果关系,但FDI与生态足迹之间存在反馈假说。其政策含义是,应优先考虑环境友好型外国直接投资,以便通过发展可再生能源实现可持续的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Green Economics
International Journal of Green Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: IJGE, a peer-reviewed international journal, proposes and fosters discussion on all aspects of Green Economics. It contributes to international research and practice in Green Economics with the aim of encouraging economic change and the positioning of Green Economics at the centre of the Economics disciplines. Green Economic theories and policies, tools, instruments and metrics are developed with the aim of offering practical and theoretical solutions and proposals to facilitate a change to the current economic models for the benefit of the widest number of people and the planet as a whole. IJGE focuses particularly on resource management, on meeting peoples’ needs and the impact and effects of international trends and how to increase social justice.
期刊最新文献
Importance of Social Videogaming for Connection with Others During the COVID-19 Pandemic. The eco-environmental costs of conflicts Customer attitudes towards organic products and their impact on satisfaction - an empirical study Four principles for a human rights-based approach to development without growth Evaluating the factors influencing consumers willingness to buy plant-based meat alternatives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1