In Vitro Release Testing (IVRT) of Topical Hydrocortisone Acetate Creams: A Novel Approach Using Positive and Negative Controls

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Dissolution Technologies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.14227/dt270120p6
Nyengeterai Amanda Mudyahoto, Seeprarani Rath, Ashmita Ramanah, I. Kanfer
{"title":"In Vitro Release Testing (IVRT) of Topical Hydrocortisone Acetate Creams: A Novel Approach Using Positive and Negative Controls","authors":"Nyengeterai Amanda Mudyahoto, Seeprarani Rath, Ashmita Ramanah, I. Kanfer","doi":"10.14227/dt270120p6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to develop and validate an in vitro release testing (IVRT) method to assess the release of hydrocortisone acetate (HCA) from five topical formulations. A marketed generic cream containing 1% HCA was used as the reference product. Vertical diffusion cells (VDCs) were used to assess and compare the release rates of HCA from cream formulations containing 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% HCA. The study describes a novel approach to test the discriminatory power by including both positive and negative controls to declare pharmaceutical equivalence or inequivalence. The validated method was found to be sensitive, linear, precise, reproducible, robust, and selective for the analysis of HCA from topical cream products. Equivalence or inequivalence was established based on SUPAC-SS acceptance criteria using a 90% CI with limits of 75–133.33%. The IVRT method was shown to have discriminatory ability to appropriately measure significant differences in drug release from various cream formulations. This approach also provides useful information for the future development of acceptable IVRT methods to assess topical dosage forms for local action containing different drugs. INTRODUCTION Since an in vitro release rate can reflect numerous and combined effects of several physical and chemical parameters, including solubility, particle size of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and rheological properties of the dosage form, in vitro release testing (IVRT) has been recommended by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) as a test to assess pharmaceutical equivalence/inequivalence between preand post-approval product changes (1, 2). The utility of IVRT was extended in 2012 when the US FDA published a draft guidance for assessing bioequivalence (BE) of acyclovir topical ointment, which was the first such publication recommending IVRT for use as a waiver of BE studies for a locally acting topical product (3). This particular guidance provided useful and promising information for the future application of IVRT as a method for assessment of the sameness of topical formulations intended for local action. Subsequently, the US FDA has published several draft guidances using in vitro methods for biowaivers for topical products (3– 8). In addition, a recent draft guideline published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also makes provision to use IVRT for the approval of generic products (9). However, a comprehensive validation of the IVRT method is imperative to ensure that the resulting method has the requisite attributes of sensitivity, precision, selectivity, and reproducibility necessary to detect differences relating to qualitative (Q1) and quantitative (Q2) properties and the microstructure and arrangement of matter (Q3) between products (10, 11). In light of the above, an IVRT method was developed and validated to assess creams containing 1% hydrocortisone acetate (HCA). Two marketed products containing 1% HCA and three additional creams specifically manufactured to contain 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% HCA were studied. A positive control was included to ensure that the method had the necessary capability to confirm sameness, and negative controls ensured the method had the requisite discriminatory power to detect significant differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals and Formulations Hydrocortisone acetate (HCA) was obtained from SigmaAldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade acetonitrile was obtained from Romil Ltd (200 UV ROMIL-SpS Super Purity Solvent, Waterbeach, Cambridge, UK) and ethanol (95%) was purchased from Merck Laboratories (Wadeville, Gauteng, South Africa). The water used for chromatography was dx.doi.org/10.14227/DT270120P6 e-mail: I.Kanfer@ru.ac.za * Corresponding author.","PeriodicalId":11380,"journal":{"name":"Dissolution Technologies","volume":"27 1","pages":"6-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dissolution Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14227/dt270120p6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The objective was to develop and validate an in vitro release testing (IVRT) method to assess the release of hydrocortisone acetate (HCA) from five topical formulations. A marketed generic cream containing 1% HCA was used as the reference product. Vertical diffusion cells (VDCs) were used to assess and compare the release rates of HCA from cream formulations containing 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% HCA. The study describes a novel approach to test the discriminatory power by including both positive and negative controls to declare pharmaceutical equivalence or inequivalence. The validated method was found to be sensitive, linear, precise, reproducible, robust, and selective for the analysis of HCA from topical cream products. Equivalence or inequivalence was established based on SUPAC-SS acceptance criteria using a 90% CI with limits of 75–133.33%. The IVRT method was shown to have discriminatory ability to appropriately measure significant differences in drug release from various cream formulations. This approach also provides useful information for the future development of acceptable IVRT methods to assess topical dosage forms for local action containing different drugs. INTRODUCTION Since an in vitro release rate can reflect numerous and combined effects of several physical and chemical parameters, including solubility, particle size of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and rheological properties of the dosage form, in vitro release testing (IVRT) has been recommended by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) as a test to assess pharmaceutical equivalence/inequivalence between preand post-approval product changes (1, 2). The utility of IVRT was extended in 2012 when the US FDA published a draft guidance for assessing bioequivalence (BE) of acyclovir topical ointment, which was the first such publication recommending IVRT for use as a waiver of BE studies for a locally acting topical product (3). This particular guidance provided useful and promising information for the future application of IVRT as a method for assessment of the sameness of topical formulations intended for local action. Subsequently, the US FDA has published several draft guidances using in vitro methods for biowaivers for topical products (3– 8). In addition, a recent draft guideline published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also makes provision to use IVRT for the approval of generic products (9). However, a comprehensive validation of the IVRT method is imperative to ensure that the resulting method has the requisite attributes of sensitivity, precision, selectivity, and reproducibility necessary to detect differences relating to qualitative (Q1) and quantitative (Q2) properties and the microstructure and arrangement of matter (Q3) between products (10, 11). In light of the above, an IVRT method was developed and validated to assess creams containing 1% hydrocortisone acetate (HCA). Two marketed products containing 1% HCA and three additional creams specifically manufactured to contain 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% HCA were studied. A positive control was included to ensure that the method had the necessary capability to confirm sameness, and negative controls ensured the method had the requisite discriminatory power to detect significant differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals and Formulations Hydrocortisone acetate (HCA) was obtained from SigmaAldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade acetonitrile was obtained from Romil Ltd (200 UV ROMIL-SpS Super Purity Solvent, Waterbeach, Cambridge, UK) and ethanol (95%) was purchased from Merck Laboratories (Wadeville, Gauteng, South Africa). The water used for chromatography was dx.doi.org/10.14227/DT270120P6 e-mail: I.Kanfer@ru.ac.za * Corresponding author.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外用醋酸氢化可的松乳膏体外释放试验(IVRT):一种采用阳性和阴性对照的新方法
目的是开发和验证体外释放试验(IVRT)方法,以评估五种外用制剂中醋酸氢化可的松(HCA)的释放。采用一种含1% HCA的市售通用乳膏作为参比产品。垂直扩散池(vdc)用于评估和比较含有0.5%、1%和1.5% HCA的乳膏制剂中HCA的释放率。该研究描述了一种新的方法,通过包括积极和消极的控制来宣布药物等效或不等效来检验歧视力。结果表明,该方法具有灵敏度高、线性好、精确度高、重复性好、稳健性好、选择性好等特点。根据SUPAC-SS接受标准确定等效或不等效,CI为90%,限为75-133.33%。IVRT方法被证明具有区分能力,可以适当地测量各种乳膏制剂中药物释放的显着差异。该方法也为未来发展可接受的IVRT方法提供了有用的信息,以评估含有不同药物的局部作用的局部剂型。由于体外释放率可以反映多种物理和化学参数的综合影响,包括溶解度、活性药物成分(API)的粒度和剂型的流变特性,因此美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)推荐体外释放测试(IVRT)作为评估批准前和批准后产品变化之间药物等效性/不等效性的测试(1)。2). IVRT的应用在2012年得到了扩展,当时美国FDA发布了一份评估阿昔洛韦外用软膏生物等效性(BE)的指南草案,这是第一个推荐使用IVRT作为局部作用外用产品生物等效性研究豁免的出版物(3)。这一特殊的指南为IVRT作为评估局部作用外用制剂一致性的方法的未来应用提供了有用和有希望的信息。随后,美国FDA发布了几份使用体外方法进行外用产品生物豁免的指南草案(3 - 8)。此外,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)最近发布的指南草案也规定使用IVRT来批准仿制药(9)。然而,IVRT方法的全面验证是必要的,以确保所得到的方法具有必要的敏感性、精密度、选择性、以及必要的再现性,以检测与产品之间的定性(Q1)和定量(Q2)性质以及物质(Q3)的微观结构和排列有关的差异(10,11)。鉴于上述,我们开发并验证了一种IVRT方法来评估含有1%醋酸氢化可的松(HCA)的面霜。研究了两种含有1% HCA的上市产品和三种专门生产的含有0.5%,1%和1.5% HCA的面霜。包括一个阳性对照,以确保该方法具有确认相似性的必要能力,而阴性对照则确保该方法具有必要的鉴别能力,以发现显著差异。材料与方法化学与配方醋酸氢化可的松(HCA)购自SigmaAldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA)。高效液相色谱(HPLC)级乙腈购自Romil Ltd (200 UV Romil - sps超纯溶剂,Waterbeach, Cambridge, UK),乙醇(95%)购自Merck Laboratories (Wadeville, Gauteng, South Africa)。色谱用水:dx.doi.org/10.14227/DT270120P6 e-mail: I.Kanfer@ru.ac.za *通讯作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dissolution Technologies
Dissolution Technologies 医学-药学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
14
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dissolution Technologies is a peer reviewed quarterly publication reporting ongoing, useful information on dissolution testing of pharmaceuticals. It provides an international forum for dissolution analysts to receive and exchange information on various dissolution topics. Dissolution Technologies welcomes submissions related to dissolution, in vitro release, and disintegration testing. These topics should be the major focus of the article. Do not submit articles where the focus is formulation development with dissolution testing as one of many tests.
期刊最新文献
Steady-state burning plasma: a new stage in the development of magnetic confinement fusion energy. Investigating the Influence of HPMC K4M and Eudragit L 100-55 on Guanfacine-Loaded Extended-Release Tablets Questions and Answers February 2023 Effect of Mannitol Particle Size on Melatonin Dissolution and Tablet Properties using a Quality by Design Framework Physicochemical Quality and In Vitro Bioequivalence of Amoxicillin Capsules Marketed in Burkina Faso, Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1