In Vitro Comparative Dissolution Assessment of Different Brands of Co-Amoxiclav Tablets in Pakistan

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Dissolution Technologies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.14227/dt270420pgc1
M. Waqas, R. Ali, M. Usman, Muhammad Shahid, A. Rasul, B. Khan, G. Murtaza
{"title":"In Vitro Comparative Dissolution Assessment of Different Brands of Co-Amoxiclav Tablets in Pakistan","authors":"M. Waqas, R. Ali, M. Usman, Muhammad Shahid, A. Rasul, B. Khan, G. Murtaza","doi":"10.14227/dt270420pgc1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dissolution test results are the principal indicator in estimating the in-vivo bioavailability of most oral solid dosage forms and are an important quality attribute to assess the generic formulation. This study was designed to assess the release of co-amoxiclav from finished pharmaceutical solid dosage formulations. Both innovator and generic tablets of co-amoxiclav were subjected to dissolution testing (USP method 2 and HPLC). The innovator’s product (product A) met compendial criteria regarding bioavailability of both amoxicillin and clavulanic acid. The two generic brands, product B and C, failed to meet the criteria for release of amoxicillin (i.e., 80–85%); however, they did achieve 100% release of clavulanic acid in the initial half hour. Moreover, analysis showed significant variance between the innovator’s and generic brands (p < 0.05 for both of amoxicillin products). Hence, the innovator’s and generic brands are not bioequivalent for amoxicillin release, despite both compliance with limits for clavulanic acid release. Failure to achieve dissolution standards argues that compliance with compendial guidelines is critical for generic manufacturing of co-amoxiclav.","PeriodicalId":11380,"journal":{"name":"Dissolution Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dissolution Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14227/dt270420pgc1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dissolution test results are the principal indicator in estimating the in-vivo bioavailability of most oral solid dosage forms and are an important quality attribute to assess the generic formulation. This study was designed to assess the release of co-amoxiclav from finished pharmaceutical solid dosage formulations. Both innovator and generic tablets of co-amoxiclav were subjected to dissolution testing (USP method 2 and HPLC). The innovator’s product (product A) met compendial criteria regarding bioavailability of both amoxicillin and clavulanic acid. The two generic brands, product B and C, failed to meet the criteria for release of amoxicillin (i.e., 80–85%); however, they did achieve 100% release of clavulanic acid in the initial half hour. Moreover, analysis showed significant variance between the innovator’s and generic brands (p < 0.05 for both of amoxicillin products). Hence, the innovator’s and generic brands are not bioequivalent for amoxicillin release, despite both compliance with limits for clavulanic acid release. Failure to achieve dissolution standards argues that compliance with compendial guidelines is critical for generic manufacturing of co-amoxiclav.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同品牌复方阿莫昔拉夫片在巴基斯坦的体外比较溶出度评价
溶出度试验结果是评估大多数口服固体剂型体内生物利用度的主要指标,也是评估仿制制剂的重要质量指标。本研究旨在评估共阿莫昔拉夫从成品固体制剂中的释放。采用USP法2和高效液相色谱法对复方阿莫昔拉创新片和仿制片进行溶出度测定。创新者的产品(产品A)符合阿莫西林和克拉维酸生物利用度的药典标准。产品B和C两个仿制品牌不符合阿莫西林释放标准(即80-85%);然而,他们确实在最初的半小时内实现了100%的克拉维酸释放。此外,分析显示创新品牌和仿制品牌之间存在显著差异(两种阿莫西林产品的p < 0.05)。因此,创新品牌和仿制品牌在阿莫西林释放方面不具有生物等效性,尽管两者都符合克拉维酸释放限制。未能达到溶出度标准认为,遵守药典指南对复方阿莫昔拉的仿制生产至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dissolution Technologies
Dissolution Technologies 医学-药学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
14
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dissolution Technologies is a peer reviewed quarterly publication reporting ongoing, useful information on dissolution testing of pharmaceuticals. It provides an international forum for dissolution analysts to receive and exchange information on various dissolution topics. Dissolution Technologies welcomes submissions related to dissolution, in vitro release, and disintegration testing. These topics should be the major focus of the article. Do not submit articles where the focus is formulation development with dissolution testing as one of many tests.
期刊最新文献
Steady-state burning plasma: a new stage in the development of magnetic confinement fusion energy. Investigating the Influence of HPMC K4M and Eudragit L 100-55 on Guanfacine-Loaded Extended-Release Tablets Questions and Answers February 2023 Effect of Mannitol Particle Size on Melatonin Dissolution and Tablet Properties using a Quality by Design Framework Physicochemical Quality and In Vitro Bioequivalence of Amoxicillin Capsules Marketed in Burkina Faso, Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1