Comparative Evaluation of In Vitro Drug Release Methods Employed for Nanoparticle Drug Release Studies

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Dissolution Technologies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.14227/dt280421p30
S. K. Paswan, T. Saini
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of In Vitro Drug Release Methods Employed for Nanoparticle Drug Release Studies","authors":"S. K. Paswan, T. Saini","doi":"10.14227/dt280421p30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to experimentally compare the attributes, drawbacks, and limitations of the most commonly employed in vitro drug release test methods for nanoparticle systems and to explore the possibility of one method being adopted as a standard for quality control of nanoparticle-based products. Three in vitro drug release test methods, i.e., direct addition, dialysis bag, and low-pressure ultrafiltration, were employed for evaluation of drug release from tamoxifen-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles. Relevant operational characteristics of each test method were compared. Drug release data were fitted in different release kinetics models, i.e., zero order, first order, Higuchi, Hixson-Crowell, and Korsmeyer-Peppas. The coefficient of determination (R2), release rate constant (k), and release exponent (n) values were calculated. The direct addition method showed rapid initial drug release, whereas a slow release rate was observed in the dialysis bag method. Results of the low-pressure ultrafiltration method were consistent with the direct addition method and various operational characteristics were more realistic than the other two methods. Overall, the findings support that low-pressure ultrafiltration can be considered as a standard regulatory test method for in vitro release of nanoparticle-based formulations.","PeriodicalId":11380,"journal":{"name":"Dissolution Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dissolution Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14227/dt280421p30","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to experimentally compare the attributes, drawbacks, and limitations of the most commonly employed in vitro drug release test methods for nanoparticle systems and to explore the possibility of one method being adopted as a standard for quality control of nanoparticle-based products. Three in vitro drug release test methods, i.e., direct addition, dialysis bag, and low-pressure ultrafiltration, were employed for evaluation of drug release from tamoxifen-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles. Relevant operational characteristics of each test method were compared. Drug release data were fitted in different release kinetics models, i.e., zero order, first order, Higuchi, Hixson-Crowell, and Korsmeyer-Peppas. The coefficient of determination (R2), release rate constant (k), and release exponent (n) values were calculated. The direct addition method showed rapid initial drug release, whereas a slow release rate was observed in the dialysis bag method. Results of the low-pressure ultrafiltration method were consistent with the direct addition method and various operational characteristics were more realistic than the other two methods. Overall, the findings support that low-pressure ultrafiltration can be considered as a standard regulatory test method for in vitro release of nanoparticle-based formulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纳米颗粒药物体外释放研究方法的比较评价
本研究的目的是通过实验比较纳米颗粒系统中最常用的体外药物释放测试方法的特性、缺点和局限性,并探讨采用一种方法作为纳米颗粒产品质量控制标准的可能性。采用直接加成法、透析袋法和低压超滤法三种体外释药试验方法对负载他莫昔芬的聚乳酸-羟基乙酸纳米颗粒的释药效果进行了评价。比较了各试验方法的相关工作特性。采用零级、一级、Higuchi、Hixson-Crowell、Korsmeyer-Peppas释放动力学模型拟合药物释放数据。计算其决定系数(R2)、释放速率常数(k)和释放指数(n)值。直接加成法初释药速度快,透析袋法初释药速度慢。低压超滤法的结果与直接加入法一致,各项操作特性比其他两种方法更真实。总的来说,研究结果支持低压超滤可以被认为是纳米颗粒基制剂体外释放的标准监管测试方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dissolution Technologies
Dissolution Technologies 医学-药学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
14
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dissolution Technologies is a peer reviewed quarterly publication reporting ongoing, useful information on dissolution testing of pharmaceuticals. It provides an international forum for dissolution analysts to receive and exchange information on various dissolution topics. Dissolution Technologies welcomes submissions related to dissolution, in vitro release, and disintegration testing. These topics should be the major focus of the article. Do not submit articles where the focus is formulation development with dissolution testing as one of many tests.
期刊最新文献
Steady-state burning plasma: a new stage in the development of magnetic confinement fusion energy. Investigating the Influence of HPMC K4M and Eudragit L 100-55 on Guanfacine-Loaded Extended-Release Tablets Questions and Answers February 2023 Effect of Mannitol Particle Size on Melatonin Dissolution and Tablet Properties using a Quality by Design Framework Physicochemical Quality and In Vitro Bioequivalence of Amoxicillin Capsules Marketed in Burkina Faso, Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1