Should democracy be part of the definition of economics COVID policies in a broader context

P. Söderbaum
{"title":"Should democracy be part of the definition of economics COVID policies in a broader context","authors":"P. Söderbaum","doi":"10.1504/IJPEE.2020.116231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In economics, 'values are always with us'. In our studies, we make a number of choices and the choices we make tell us something about our values. Economics is always 'political economics'. The attempt by neoclassical economists to offer a purely scientific economics has failed. Instead, we need to take democracy and pluralism seriously and discuss how a different conceptual framework can strengthen rather than weaken democracy in our societies. Neoclassical economics and 'sustainability economics' are presented as two different ideological orientations in the form of 'narratives'. As economists, we make a choice between narratives (with their respective conceptual framework) and our values are revealed when choosing one narrative rather than the other. Democracy is threatened in some countries and even in nations belonging to the European Union. It is time for us as economists to discuss how democracy can be integrated into economics with its conceptual framework. Health issues, such as COVID-19 are part of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals sanctioned by the United Nations. In this article, a holistic or broad perspective of economics is encouraged. Health issues have features in common with environmental and natural resource issues, for example.","PeriodicalId":52200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPEE.2020.116231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In economics, 'values are always with us'. In our studies, we make a number of choices and the choices we make tell us something about our values. Economics is always 'political economics'. The attempt by neoclassical economists to offer a purely scientific economics has failed. Instead, we need to take democracy and pluralism seriously and discuss how a different conceptual framework can strengthen rather than weaken democracy in our societies. Neoclassical economics and 'sustainability economics' are presented as two different ideological orientations in the form of 'narratives'. As economists, we make a choice between narratives (with their respective conceptual framework) and our values are revealed when choosing one narrative rather than the other. Democracy is threatened in some countries and even in nations belonging to the European Union. It is time for us as economists to discuss how democracy can be integrated into economics with its conceptual framework. Health issues, such as COVID-19 are part of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals sanctioned by the United Nations. In this article, a holistic or broad perspective of economics is encouraged. Health issues have features in common with environmental and natural resource issues, for example.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在更广泛的背景下,民主是否应该成为经济政策定义的一部分
在经济学中,“价值观永远与我们同在”。在我们的学习中,我们做了许多选择,我们所做的选择告诉我们一些关于我们的价值观。经济学总是“政治经济学”。新古典经济学家提出纯粹科学经济学的尝试失败了。相反,我们需要认真对待民主和多元化,并讨论一种不同的概念框架如何能够加强而不是削弱我们社会中的民主。新古典经济学和“可持续性经济学”以“叙事”的形式呈现为两种不同的意识形态取向。作为经济学家,我们在叙事(以及各自的概念框架)之间做出选择,当选择一种叙事而不是另一种叙事时,我们的价值观就会显露出来。民主在一些国家,甚至在属于欧盟的国家受到威胁。作为经济学家,我们现在应该讨论如何将民主主义与经济学的概念框架结合起来。COVID-19等健康问题是联合国批准的17项可持续发展目标的一部分。在这篇文章中,鼓励一个整体的或广泛的经济学观点。例如,健康问题与环境和自然资源问题具有共同的特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education
International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Learning by Comparison: The Benefits and Challenges of Applying Pluralism to a Lesson Series in the IB Diploma Programme Economics Course. Backhouse and Medema on the definition of economics: Some critical observations Predicting Bank Performance using Machine Learning: A Case of Troubled Banks in India Pluralism and Teaching a 'Women in the Economy' Course over Time Reframing economic agency in times of uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1