Anthropologists in Search of a Culture: Margaret Mead, Derek Freeman and All the Rest of Us

Eleanor Leacock
{"title":"Anthropologists in Search of a Culture: Margaret Mead, Derek Freeman and All the Rest of Us","authors":"Eleanor Leacock","doi":"10.1525/cia.1988.8.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This compelling analysis of the implications of the “Mead-Freeman” debate is the last work by Eleanor Leacock, who died in Samoa in 1987. According to Leacock, one of the principal effects of Freeman's attack on Mead's work was to focus attention upon his support for biological determinism. In addition, his findings about Samoa ignored the culture changes that had taken place in Samoa through time. Freeman can also be faulted for failing to note the contemporary problems of Samoa as a small, Third World island nation.</p><p>On the other hand, Leacock reflects on the possibility that even if Mead's research reinforced an infantile image of Samoans as “simple, happy natives,” Freeman's “balanced” emphasis on aggression and violence has potentially negative effects for Samoan communities throughout the world. Hence, both Mead and Freeman separated Samoan culture from Samoan history.</p><p>Leacock thus demonstrates vividly that the lack of a historically based, advocacy-oriented anthropology produces stereotyped images. This advocacy is the key to forging access to the “insider” perspective, for it assumes that it is undertaken in active collaboration with those whom the researcher is studying. Leacock's paper thus points the way to a more constructuve and collaborative ethnography.</p>","PeriodicalId":84419,"journal":{"name":"Central issues in anthropology : a journal of the Central States Anthropological Society","volume":"8 1","pages":"3-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/cia.1988.8.1.3","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central issues in anthropology : a journal of the Central States Anthropological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/cia.1988.8.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This compelling analysis of the implications of the “Mead-Freeman” debate is the last work by Eleanor Leacock, who died in Samoa in 1987. According to Leacock, one of the principal effects of Freeman's attack on Mead's work was to focus attention upon his support for biological determinism. In addition, his findings about Samoa ignored the culture changes that had taken place in Samoa through time. Freeman can also be faulted for failing to note the contemporary problems of Samoa as a small, Third World island nation.

On the other hand, Leacock reflects on the possibility that even if Mead's research reinforced an infantile image of Samoans as “simple, happy natives,” Freeman's “balanced” emphasis on aggression and violence has potentially negative effects for Samoan communities throughout the world. Hence, both Mead and Freeman separated Samoan culture from Samoan history.

Leacock thus demonstrates vividly that the lack of a historically based, advocacy-oriented anthropology produces stereotyped images. This advocacy is the key to forging access to the “insider” perspective, for it assumes that it is undertaken in active collaboration with those whom the researcher is studying. Leacock's paper thus points the way to a more constructuve and collaborative ethnography.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《寻找文化的人类学家:玛格丽特·米德、德里克·弗里曼和我们所有其他人》
这本对“米德-弗里曼”之争的深刻分析是埃莉诺·利科克的最后一部作品,她于1987年在萨摩亚去世。根据利科克的说法,弗里曼攻击米德工作的主要影响之一是将注意力集中在他对生物决定论的支持上。此外,他关于萨摩亚的调查结果忽略了萨摩亚随着时间的推移所发生的文化变化。弗里曼也有过错,因为他没有注意到萨摩亚作为一个小的第三世界岛国所面临的当代问题。另一方面,利科克思考了这样一种可能性,即即使米德的研究强化了萨摩亚人作为“简单、快乐的土著”的幼稚形象,弗里曼对侵略和暴力的“平衡”强调对世界各地的萨摩亚社区有潜在的负面影响。因此,米德和弗里曼都将萨摩亚文化与萨摩亚历史分开。因此,利科克生动地表明,缺乏以历史为基础、倡导为导向的人类学会产生刻板印象。这种倡导是获得“内部人士”视角的关键,因为它假设它是在与研究人员正在研究的对象积极合作的情况下进行的。因此,利科克的论文指出了一条更具建设性和合作性的民族志之路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theoretical Perspectives for Explaining Infant Mortality in the Third World Perceptions of Mental Disorders in the Context of Social Change: Correlates and Implications for Socio-Medical Behavior Family Structure and Mental Health in Urban Guyana Studying Health Developing Societies: A Conceptually-Informed Research Agenda Child Survival in Community Contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1