Total factor productivity convergence of Indonesia’s provincial economies, 2011-2017

IF 2.3 0 GEOGRAPHY Regional Statistics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.15196/rs110403
R. Purwono, M. Yasin, I. N. Hamzah, N. Arifin
{"title":"Total factor productivity convergence of Indonesia’s provincial economies, 2011-2017","authors":"R. Purwono, M. Yasin, I. N. Hamzah, N. Arifin","doi":"10.15196/rs110403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the potential convergence process of total factor productivity (TFP) among 33 provinces in Indonesia in a period between 2011 and 2017. It is the first study that captures the effect of intra-provincial trade and international trade on the TFP convergence. The authors employ stochastic frontier analysis to identify the TFP and generalized methods of moment (GMM) to examine the convergence process. The result of this study confirms that the TFP convergence process in Indonesia occurred in 2011–2017. Concerning intra-provincial and international trades, the study discovered that neither of them promotes TFP growth. Rather, except for the international import, they reduce the gap of TFP growth amongst provinces. The result demonstrates that intra-provincial exports reduce the TFP growth gap by 19.7% more than international exports. This finding indicates that intra-provincial exports are more efficacious in reducing regional inequality. The same is true for the intra-provincial import. This finding delivers essential policy implications such as streamlining the development policies across provinces, albeit the prevailing decentralization program. This should inform the formulation of regional regulations so these will not hinder the provincial growth convergence. This study uses three groups of variables: production frontier, inefficiency effect and the determinants of convergence. Variables in the production frontier are: output proxied by nominal gross domestic regional product (GDRP) in Rupiah, inputs that consist of capital proxied by nominal gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) in Rupiah and labour proxied by the number of labour force. Variables in the inefficiency effect only contain the time trend. Meanwhile, variables in the determinants of convergence encompass: intra-provincial export, international export, intra-provincial import, and international import. The determinants of convergence are measured through their ratio to the GDRP (Mitsis 2021). magnitude at 0.3% in 2011–2017. This suggests that Indonesian provinces have demonstrated a technological progress in terms of the contribution of capital and labour towards obtaining GDRP. This study stresses that three regions which demonstrated the largest technological progress are all on Java Island i.e. Jakarta (1.2%), East Java and West Java (1.1%). This finding indicates that the shifting frontier of capital and labour generating output remains relatively centralised in the area of","PeriodicalId":44388,"journal":{"name":"Regional Statistics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15196/rs110403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the potential convergence process of total factor productivity (TFP) among 33 provinces in Indonesia in a period between 2011 and 2017. It is the first study that captures the effect of intra-provincial trade and international trade on the TFP convergence. The authors employ stochastic frontier analysis to identify the TFP and generalized methods of moment (GMM) to examine the convergence process. The result of this study confirms that the TFP convergence process in Indonesia occurred in 2011–2017. Concerning intra-provincial and international trades, the study discovered that neither of them promotes TFP growth. Rather, except for the international import, they reduce the gap of TFP growth amongst provinces. The result demonstrates that intra-provincial exports reduce the TFP growth gap by 19.7% more than international exports. This finding indicates that intra-provincial exports are more efficacious in reducing regional inequality. The same is true for the intra-provincial import. This finding delivers essential policy implications such as streamlining the development policies across provinces, albeit the prevailing decentralization program. This should inform the formulation of regional regulations so these will not hinder the provincial growth convergence. This study uses three groups of variables: production frontier, inefficiency effect and the determinants of convergence. Variables in the production frontier are: output proxied by nominal gross domestic regional product (GDRP) in Rupiah, inputs that consist of capital proxied by nominal gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) in Rupiah and labour proxied by the number of labour force. Variables in the inefficiency effect only contain the time trend. Meanwhile, variables in the determinants of convergence encompass: intra-provincial export, international export, intra-provincial import, and international import. The determinants of convergence are measured through their ratio to the GDRP (Mitsis 2021). magnitude at 0.3% in 2011–2017. This suggests that Indonesian provinces have demonstrated a technological progress in terms of the contribution of capital and labour towards obtaining GDRP. This study stresses that three regions which demonstrated the largest technological progress are all on Java Island i.e. Jakarta (1.2%), East Java and West Java (1.1%). This finding indicates that the shifting frontier of capital and labour generating output remains relatively centralised in the area of
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2011-2017年印尼省级经济全要素生产率趋同
本研究旨在探讨2011 - 2017年印尼33个省份全要素生产率(TFP)的潜在趋同过程。这是第一次研究省内贸易和国际贸易对TFP趋同的影响。作者采用随机前沿分析来识别TFP,并采用广义矩量法来检验收敛过程。研究结果证实,印度尼西亚的TFP趋同过程发生在2011-2017年。对于省内贸易和国际贸易,研究发现两者对TFP增长都没有促进作用。相反,除了国际进口外,它们缩小了各省间全要素生产率增长的差距。结果表明,省内出口比国际出口对全要素生产率增长差距的缩小幅度大19.7%。这一发现表明,省内出口在减少地区不平等方面更为有效。省内进口也是如此。这一发现提供了重要的政策启示,如简化各省之间的发展政策,尽管是普遍的权力下放计划。这应该为区域法规的制定提供信息,这样就不会阻碍各省的增长趋同。本研究采用三组变量:生产前沿、低效率效应和收敛决定因素。生产前沿的变量是:以印尼盾表示的名义国内区域生产总值(GDRP)代表的产出,以印尼盾表示的名义固定资本形成总额(GFCF)代表的资本投入,以及以劳动力数量代表的劳动力投入。无效率效应中的变量只包含时间趋势。同时,收敛决定因素的变量包括:省内出口、国际出口、省内进口和国际进口。趋同的决定因素是通过它们与gdp的比率来衡量的(Mitsis 2021)。2011-2017年为0.3%。这表明印度尼西亚各省在资本和劳动力对获得国内生产总值的贡献方面已经显示出技术进步。本研究强调,技术进步最大的三个地区都在爪哇岛,即雅加达(1.2%)、东爪哇和西爪哇(1.1%)。这一发现表明,产生产出的资本和劳动力的转移边界仍然相对集中在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Regional Statistics
Regional Statistics GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
52.20%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The periodical welcomes studies, research and conference reports, book reviews, discussion articles reflecting on our former articles. The periodical welcomes articles from the following areas: regional statistics, regional science, social geography, regional planning, sociology, geographical information science Goals of the journal: high-level studies in the field of regional analyses, to encourage the exchange of views and discussion among researchers in the area of regional researches.
期刊最新文献
Analysing spatiotemporal patterns of Covid-19 confirmed deaths at the NUTS-2 regional level What effects will Covid-19 have on the G7 stock markets? New evidence from a cross-quantilogram approach Effects of weather on the health of individuals: Comparative evidence from Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam Categorisation of regions in the European Union based on smart and inclusive growth indicators for the Europe 2020 strategy The measuring of urban amenities index and its effect on migration: Evidence from Indonesian cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1