Holistic Management Assessment of an Urbanized Watershed and Kettle Pond in Southern Wisconsin

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Case Studies in the Environment Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1525/cse.2022.1347685
Eric D. Mortensen, S. Fuller, Josh Wolf, Amanda Smith, Bridget Faust, A. Thompson
{"title":"Holistic Management Assessment of an Urbanized Watershed and Kettle Pond in Southern Wisconsin","authors":"Eric D. Mortensen, S. Fuller, Josh Wolf, Amanda Smith, Bridget Faust, A. Thompson","doi":"10.1525/cse.2022.1347685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A multidisciplinary assessment of a small pond and its fully urbanized watershed was conducted to understand physical, biological, and social factors influencing this natural resource. Originally an emergent wetland lacking natural drainage, Stricker’s Pond today is a resource shared by two municipalities which has been hydrologically connected (via a man-made outlet) to the larger Yahara River watershed in Wisconsin. The assessment involved water quantity and water quality measurement and modeling, vegetation and wildlife surveys, and community surveys and observation. Major findings include the following: increased flood risk caused by large storm events; high concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus, likely contributed by a variety of natural and anthropogenic sources, resulting in full eutrophication; varied, but generally poor, vegetation biodiversity; limited wildlife diversity; and discrepancies between the management objectives of the two municipalities which share the resource and the surrounding community’s vision for the pond. To overcome these issues, a collection of recommendations are suggested for implementation. These recommendations range from minimal reoccurring maintenance and community engagement to specific management strategies and intermunicipal collaboration. With the recommendations provided within the assessment, a new, better pathway forward can be charted for Stricker’s Pond by decision makers and community members alike. By engaging with this case study, participants will be exposed to the complexity of water resources challenges occurring in this as well as their own communities. Thus, this case study can serve to participants as an example and a baseline of how similar holistic resource management assessments can be carried out in the future.","PeriodicalId":42507,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in the Environment","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2022.1347685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A multidisciplinary assessment of a small pond and its fully urbanized watershed was conducted to understand physical, biological, and social factors influencing this natural resource. Originally an emergent wetland lacking natural drainage, Stricker’s Pond today is a resource shared by two municipalities which has been hydrologically connected (via a man-made outlet) to the larger Yahara River watershed in Wisconsin. The assessment involved water quantity and water quality measurement and modeling, vegetation and wildlife surveys, and community surveys and observation. Major findings include the following: increased flood risk caused by large storm events; high concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus, likely contributed by a variety of natural and anthropogenic sources, resulting in full eutrophication; varied, but generally poor, vegetation biodiversity; limited wildlife diversity; and discrepancies between the management objectives of the two municipalities which share the resource and the surrounding community’s vision for the pond. To overcome these issues, a collection of recommendations are suggested for implementation. These recommendations range from minimal reoccurring maintenance and community engagement to specific management strategies and intermunicipal collaboration. With the recommendations provided within the assessment, a new, better pathway forward can be charted for Stricker’s Pond by decision makers and community members alike. By engaging with this case study, participants will be exposed to the complexity of water resources challenges occurring in this as well as their own communities. Thus, this case study can serve to participants as an example and a baseline of how similar holistic resource management assessments can be carried out in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
威斯康星州南部一个城市化流域和水壶池的整体管理评估
对一个小池塘及其完全城市化的流域进行了多学科评估,以了解影响这一自然资源的物理、生物和社会因素。斯特里克池塘最初是一个缺乏自然排水的新兴湿地,今天是两个市政当局共享的资源,它通过一个人造出口与威斯康星州更大的雅哈拉河流域相连。评估包括水量和水质测量和建模,植被和野生动物调查,以及社区调查和观察。主要研究结果包括:大型风暴事件导致洪水风险增加;可能由各种自然和人为来源造成的高浓度氮和磷,导致全面富营养化;植被多样性多样,但普遍较差;野生动物多样性有限;共享资源的两个市政当局的管理目标和周围社区对池塘的愿景之间存在差异。为了克服这些问题,提出了一系列建议供实施。这些建议的范围从最低限度的重复维护和社区参与到具体的管理战略和城市间合作。根据评估中提供的建议,决策者和社区成员可以为斯特里克池塘规划一条新的、更好的前进道路。通过参与这个案例研究,参与者将接触到在这个以及他们自己的社区发生的水资源挑战的复杂性。因此,这一个案研究可以作为与会者今后如何进行类似的全面资源管理评价的一个例子和基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Legacies Matter: Exploring Social Acceptance of Pumped Storage Hydro in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula Governing Transition: Case Studies in Transformative Adaptation Understanding Facilitators and Barriers to Success: Framework for Developing Community Forestry Case Studies The Bronx River and Environmental Justice Through the Lens of a Watershed Barriers and Facilitators for Successful Community Forestry: Lessons Learned and Practical Applications From Case Studies in India and Guatemala
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1