Alzheimer's Prevention Education: If We Build It, Will They Come? www.AlzU.org.

IF 8.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Jpad-Journal of Prevention of Alzheimers Disease Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI:10.14283/jpad.2014.4
Richard S. Isaacson, N. Haynes, A. Seifan, D. Larsen, S. Christiansen, J. C. Berger, Joseph Safdieh, A. Lunde, A. Luo, M. Kramps, M. McInnis, C. Ochner
{"title":"Alzheimer's Prevention Education: If We Build It, Will They Come? www.AlzU.org.","authors":"Richard S. Isaacson, N. Haynes, A. Seifan, D. Larsen, S. Christiansen, J. C. Berger, Joseph Safdieh, A. Lunde, A. Luo, M. Kramps, M. McInnis, C. Ochner","doi":"10.14283/jpad.2014.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Internet-based educational interventions may be useful for impacting knowledge and behavioral change. However, in AD prevention, little data exists about which educational tools work best in terms of learning and interest in participating in clinical trials. OBJECTIVES Primary: Assess effectiveness of interactive webinars vs. written blog-posts on AD prevention learning. Secondary: Evaluate the effect of AD prevention education on interest in participating in clinical trials; Assess usability of, and user perceptions about, an online AD education research platform; Classify target populations (demographics, learning needs, interests). DESIGN Observational. SETTING Online. PARTICIPANTS Men/Women, aged 25+, recruited via facebook.com. INTERVENTION Alzheimer's Universe (www.AlzU.org) education research platform. MEASUREMENTS Pre/post-test performance, self-reported Likert-scale ratings, completion rates. RESULTS Over two-weeks, 4268 visits were generated. 503 signed-up for a user account (11.8% join rate), 196 participated in the lessons (39.0%) and 100 completed all beta-testing steps (19.9%). Users randomized to webinar instruction about AD prevention and the stages of AD demonstrated significant increases (p=0.01) in pre vs. post-testing scores compared to blog-post intervention. Upon joining, 42% were interested in participating in a clinical trial in AD prevention. After completing all beta-test activities, interest increased to 86%. Users were primarily women and the largest category was children of AD patients. 66.3% joined to learn more about AD prevention, 65.3% to learn more about AD treatment. CONCLUSIONS Webinar-based education led to significant improvements in learning about AD prevention and the stages of AD. AlzU.org participation more than doubled interest in AD prevention clinical trial participation. Subjects were quickly and cost-effectively recruited, and highly satisfied with the AD education research platform. Based on these data, we will further refine AlzU.org prior to public launch and aim to study the effectiveness of 25 interactive webinar-based vs. blog-post style lessons on learning and patient outcomes, in a randomized, within-subjects design trial.","PeriodicalId":48606,"journal":{"name":"Jpad-Journal of Prevention of Alzheimers Disease","volume":"1 2 1","pages":"91-98"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jpad-Journal of Prevention of Alzheimers Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2014.4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

BACKGROUND Internet-based educational interventions may be useful for impacting knowledge and behavioral change. However, in AD prevention, little data exists about which educational tools work best in terms of learning and interest in participating in clinical trials. OBJECTIVES Primary: Assess effectiveness of interactive webinars vs. written blog-posts on AD prevention learning. Secondary: Evaluate the effect of AD prevention education on interest in participating in clinical trials; Assess usability of, and user perceptions about, an online AD education research platform; Classify target populations (demographics, learning needs, interests). DESIGN Observational. SETTING Online. PARTICIPANTS Men/Women, aged 25+, recruited via facebook.com. INTERVENTION Alzheimer's Universe (www.AlzU.org) education research platform. MEASUREMENTS Pre/post-test performance, self-reported Likert-scale ratings, completion rates. RESULTS Over two-weeks, 4268 visits were generated. 503 signed-up for a user account (11.8% join rate), 196 participated in the lessons (39.0%) and 100 completed all beta-testing steps (19.9%). Users randomized to webinar instruction about AD prevention and the stages of AD demonstrated significant increases (p=0.01) in pre vs. post-testing scores compared to blog-post intervention. Upon joining, 42% were interested in participating in a clinical trial in AD prevention. After completing all beta-test activities, interest increased to 86%. Users were primarily women and the largest category was children of AD patients. 66.3% joined to learn more about AD prevention, 65.3% to learn more about AD treatment. CONCLUSIONS Webinar-based education led to significant improvements in learning about AD prevention and the stages of AD. AlzU.org participation more than doubled interest in AD prevention clinical trial participation. Subjects were quickly and cost-effectively recruited, and highly satisfied with the AD education research platform. Based on these data, we will further refine AlzU.org prior to public launch and aim to study the effectiveness of 25 interactive webinar-based vs. blog-post style lessons on learning and patient outcomes, in a randomized, within-subjects design trial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔茨海默病预防教育:如果我们建立它,他们会来吗?www.AlzU.org。
背景:基于互联网的教育干预可能有助于影响知识和行为改变。然而,在阿尔茨海默病预防方面,关于哪种教育工具在学习和参与临床试验的兴趣方面效果最好的数据很少。主要目的:评估互动网络研讨会与书面博客文章在AD预防学习方面的有效性。第二:评估AD预防教育对参与临床试验兴趣的影响;评估在线广告教育研究平台的可用性和用户感知;分类目标人群(人口统计,学习需求,兴趣)。参与者,年龄在25岁以上,通过facebook.com.INTERVENTIONAlzheimer's Universe (www.AlzU.org)教育研究平台招募。测量/测试后表现,自我报告的李克特量表评分,完成率。结果在两周内,产生了4268次访问。503人注册了用户帐户(参与率为11.8%),196人参加了课程(39.0%),100人完成了所有beta测试步骤(19.9%)。与博客帖子干预相比,被随机分配到网络研讨会指导有关阿尔茨海默病预防和阿尔茨海默病分期的用户在测试前和测试后得分显著增加(p=0.01)。在加入时,42%的人有兴趣参加阿尔茨海默病预防的临床试验。在完成所有的beta测试活动后,兴趣增加到86%。使用者主要是女性,最大的类别是AD患者的儿童。66.3%的人是为了了解更多关于阿尔茨海默病预防的知识,65.3%的人是为了了解更多关于阿尔茨海默病治疗的知识。结论基于二进制的教育导致对AD预防和AD分期的学习有显著改善。AlzU.org的参与使参与阿尔茨海默病预防临床试验的兴趣增加了一倍以上。受试者被快速、经济地招募,对AD教育研究平台非常满意。基于这些数据,我们将在公开发布之前进一步完善AlzU.org,并在一项随机的受试者设计试验中,研究25种基于网络研讨会的交互式课程与博客帖子式课程在学习和患者预后方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.80%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The JPAD « Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease » will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including : neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes. JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Are Population-Level Approaches to Dementia Risk Reduction Under-Researched? A Rapid Review of the Dementia Prevention Literature. Expectancy Does Not Predict 18-month Treatment Outcomes with Cognitive Training in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Lifestyle and Socioeconomic Transition and Health Consequences of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias in Global, from 1990 to 2019. Data-Driven Thresholding Statistically Biases ATN Profiling across Cohort Datasets. Modifiable Risk Factors for Accelerated Decline in Processing Speed: Results from Three Dutch Population Cohorts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1