Does Variable Shift Work Explain Away Productivity Shocks? A Bayesian Approach

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik Pub Date : 2022-04-20 DOI:10.1515/jbnst-2021-0008
Lucas M. Engelhardt
{"title":"Does Variable Shift Work Explain Away Productivity Shocks? A Bayesian Approach","authors":"Lucas M. Engelhardt","doi":"10.1515/jbnst-2021-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In business cycle accounting, productivity is procyclical. However, this may be an illusion caused by improperly accounting for changes in procyclical capital utilization. This paper considers to what extent incorporating variable shift work into a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model reduces the role played by productivity shocks in explaining variations in output. In the one shift version of the model, 81 percent of the variation in output is explained by productivity shocks. With variable shift work, the contribution falls to a minimum of 48 percent. While variable shift work decreases their importance, productivity shocks continue to be the most significant contributor to the variation of output over the business cycle.","PeriodicalId":45967,"journal":{"name":"Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik","volume":"242 1","pages":"343 - 369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2021-0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In business cycle accounting, productivity is procyclical. However, this may be an illusion caused by improperly accounting for changes in procyclical capital utilization. This paper considers to what extent incorporating variable shift work into a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model reduces the role played by productivity shocks in explaining variations in output. In the one shift version of the model, 81 percent of the variation in output is explained by productivity shocks. With variable shift work, the contribution falls to a minimum of 48 percent. While variable shift work decreases their importance, productivity shocks continue to be the most significant contributor to the variation of output over the business cycle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可变轮班工作能解释生产率冲击吗?贝叶斯方法
在经济周期会计中,生产率是顺周期的。然而,这可能是由于不恰当地计算顺周期资本利用的变化而造成的错觉。本文考虑将可变轮班工作纳入动态随机一般均衡模型在多大程度上降低了生产率冲击在解释产出变化时所起的作用。在单班制模型中,81%的产出变化可以用生产率冲击来解释。有了可变的轮班工作,贡献下降到最低的48%。虽然可变轮班工作降低了其重要性,但生产力冲击仍然是商业周期中产出变化的最重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
23.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Die Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik existieren seit dem Jahr 1863. Die Herausgeber fühlen sich der Tradition verpflichtet, die Zeitschrift für kritische, innovative und entwicklungsträchtige Beiträge offen zu halten. Weder thematisch noch methodisch sollen die Veröffentlichungen auf jeweils herrschende Lehrmeinungen eingeengt werden.
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter Annual Reviewer Acknowledgement A New Decade of Research on the Economics of Climate Change Frontmatter Estimating the Effects of Political Instability in Nascent Democracies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1