Human Capital and Economic Growth in OECD Countries Revisited: Initial Stock versus Changes in the Stock of Human Capital Effects

IF 1.1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik Pub Date : 2021-08-09 DOI:10.1515/jbnst-2020-0060
Dimitar Eftimoski
{"title":"Human Capital and Economic Growth in OECD Countries Revisited: Initial Stock versus Changes in the Stock of Human Capital Effects","authors":"Dimitar Eftimoski","doi":"10.1515/jbnst-2020-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper investigates the effect of human capital on economic growth in OECD countries by focusing on two different channels: (1) absorption of superior technologies, and (2) augmentation of factors of production. One recent empirical study found that in isolation each channel appears insignificant, which implies that estimates that emanate by restrictive specifications that account for only a subset of these channels are likely to suffer from an omitted variable bias. Using an augmented specification (with interaction terms between the initial level of real GDP per capita and the average years of schooling), we find that OECD countries that start with a higher stock of human capital grow faster, which implies that human capital influences economic growth through the first channel only. Our results differ from previous studies (that investigated both channels), which either confirmed the simultaneous (positive or neutral) effect from both channels, or found that only the second channel had an isolated positive effect. We use a broad array of measures as proxies for human capital (six measures for educational attainment, and two measures for health status). We also account for the quality of human capital.","PeriodicalId":45967,"journal":{"name":"Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2020-0060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the effect of human capital on economic growth in OECD countries by focusing on two different channels: (1) absorption of superior technologies, and (2) augmentation of factors of production. One recent empirical study found that in isolation each channel appears insignificant, which implies that estimates that emanate by restrictive specifications that account for only a subset of these channels are likely to suffer from an omitted variable bias. Using an augmented specification (with interaction terms between the initial level of real GDP per capita and the average years of schooling), we find that OECD countries that start with a higher stock of human capital grow faster, which implies that human capital influences economic growth through the first channel only. Our results differ from previous studies (that investigated both channels), which either confirmed the simultaneous (positive or neutral) effect from both channels, or found that only the second channel had an isolated positive effect. We use a broad array of measures as proxies for human capital (six measures for educational attainment, and two measures for health status). We also account for the quality of human capital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人力资本与经合组织国家经济增长的再考察:人力资本效应的初始存量与存量变化
摘要本文从人力资本对经合组织国家经济增长的影响两个不同的渠道(1)吸收优势技术和(2)增加生产要素)进行研究。最近的一项实证研究发现,孤立地来看,每个渠道似乎都不重要,这意味着,仅考虑这些渠道的一个子集的限制性规范所产生的估计可能会受到遗漏变量偏差的影响。使用增强规范(具有初始实际人均GDP水平与平均受教育年限之间的相互作用项),我们发现具有较高人力资本存量的经合组织国家增长更快,这意味着人力资本仅通过第一个渠道影响经济增长。我们的结果不同于之前的研究(调查了两个渠道),这些研究要么证实了两个渠道同时(积极或中性)的影响,要么发现只有第二个渠道有孤立的积极影响。我们使用了一系列广泛的衡量指标作为人力资本的替代指标(6项衡量教育程度的指标和2项衡量健康状况的指标)。我们还考虑了人力资本的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
23.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Die Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik existieren seit dem Jahr 1863. Die Herausgeber fühlen sich der Tradition verpflichtet, die Zeitschrift für kritische, innovative und entwicklungsträchtige Beiträge offen zu halten. Weder thematisch noch methodisch sollen die Veröffentlichungen auf jeweils herrschende Lehrmeinungen eingeengt werden.
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter Annual Reviewer Acknowledgement A New Decade of Research on the Economics of Climate Change Frontmatter Estimating the Effects of Political Instability in Nascent Democracies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1