Being there yet not there: why don’t embodied responses to literary texts jar with one another?

IF 0.3 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS JOURNAL OF LITERARY SEMANTICS Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1515/jls-2016-0002
Elspeth Jajdelska
{"title":"Being there yet not there: why don’t embodied responses to literary texts jar with one another?","authors":"Elspeth Jajdelska","doi":"10.1515/jls-2016-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Language and literature can stimulate the embodied resources of perception. I argue that there is a puzzle about why we experience sequences of these embodied responses as integrated and coherent, even though they are not anchored in space and time by a perceiving body. Some successions of embodied representations would even be impossible in real world experience, yet they can still be experienced as coherent and flowing in response to verbal texts. One possibility is that embodied responses to language are fleeting; they need not be integrated because they do not depend on, or relate to, one another as they would in perception. Yet it is the potential for embodied representations to linger and connect with one another which underlies new and persuasive embodied literary theories of vividness, narrative coherence and metaphor comprehension. Another possibility is that readers anchor their embodied representations in a notional human body, one endowed with superhuman powers, such as omniscience. But this account relies on implausible, post hoc explanations. A third possibility is that integrating embodied representations produced by language need be no more problematic than integrating the deceptively patchy information harvested from the environment by perception, information which gives rise to an experience of the world in rich and continuous detail. Real world perceptual cues, however, sparse though they might be, are still integrated through grounding in specific points in time and space. To explain the integration of embodied effects, I draw on sensorimotor theories of perception, and on Clark’s suggestion (1997, Being There. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) that language can be understood as an additional modality. In this light, the embodied simulations generated by literary texts can be integrated through patterning in a high dimensional, vector space neural architecture, a patterning which recalls real world experience but is specialised to the sustained experience of language itself. This account can help us understand what makes literary experience distinctive and unique.","PeriodicalId":42874,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF LITERARY SEMANTICS","volume":"45 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jls-2016-0002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF LITERARY SEMANTICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2016-0002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Language and literature can stimulate the embodied resources of perception. I argue that there is a puzzle about why we experience sequences of these embodied responses as integrated and coherent, even though they are not anchored in space and time by a perceiving body. Some successions of embodied representations would even be impossible in real world experience, yet they can still be experienced as coherent and flowing in response to verbal texts. One possibility is that embodied responses to language are fleeting; they need not be integrated because they do not depend on, or relate to, one another as they would in perception. Yet it is the potential for embodied representations to linger and connect with one another which underlies new and persuasive embodied literary theories of vividness, narrative coherence and metaphor comprehension. Another possibility is that readers anchor their embodied representations in a notional human body, one endowed with superhuman powers, such as omniscience. But this account relies on implausible, post hoc explanations. A third possibility is that integrating embodied representations produced by language need be no more problematic than integrating the deceptively patchy information harvested from the environment by perception, information which gives rise to an experience of the world in rich and continuous detail. Real world perceptual cues, however, sparse though they might be, are still integrated through grounding in specific points in time and space. To explain the integration of embodied effects, I draw on sensorimotor theories of perception, and on Clark’s suggestion (1997, Being There. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) that language can be understood as an additional modality. In this light, the embodied simulations generated by literary texts can be integrated through patterning in a high dimensional, vector space neural architecture, a patterning which recalls real world experience but is specialised to the sustained experience of language itself. This account can help us understand what makes literary experience distinctive and unique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既在那里又不在那里:为什么对文学文本的具体反应不会彼此冲突?
语言和文学可以激发感知的具体化资源。我认为这是一个谜题,为什么我们体验到这些具体化反应的序列是完整和连贯的,即使它们没有被感知的身体固定在空间和时间上。在现实世界经验中,一些具身表征的连续性甚至是不可能的,但它们仍然可以作为对口头文本的连贯和流动的回应而被体验到。一种可能性是,对语言的具体化反应是短暂的;它们不需要被整合,因为它们不像在知觉中那样相互依赖或联系。然而,正是具身表征的潜力使其持久存在并相互联系,这是新的、有说服力的具身文学理论的基础,包括生动性、叙事连贯性和隐喻理解。另一种可能性是,读者将他们的具体表现固定在一个概念上的人类身体上,一个被赋予超人力量的人,比如无所不知。但这种说法依赖于难以置信的事后解释。第三种可能性是,整合由语言产生的具身表征并不比整合通过感知从环境中获得的看似零散的信息更有问题,这些信息产生了丰富而连续的细节世界经验。然而,现实世界的感知线索虽然可能很稀疏,但仍然通过在特定的时间和空间点上的基础而整合在一起。为了解释具身效应的整合,我借鉴了知觉的感觉运动理论和Clark的建议(1997年,Being There)。剑桥,马萨诸塞州:麻省理工学院出版社),语言可以被理解为一种额外的形态。从这个角度来看,文学文本产生的具体模拟可以通过高维向量空间神经结构的模式来整合,这种模式可以回忆起现实世界的经验,但专门用于语言本身的持续经验。这种叙述可以帮助我们理解是什么使文学体验与众不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Literary Semantics is to concentrate the endeavours of theoretical linguistics upon those texts traditionally classed as ‘literary’, in the belief that such texts are a central, not a peripheral, concern of linguistics. This journal, founded by Trevor Eaton in 1972 and edited by him for thirty years, has pioneered and encouraged research into the relations between linguistics and literature. It is widely read by theoretical and applied linguists, narratologists, poeticians, philosophers and psycholinguists. JLS publishes articles on all aspects of literary semantics. The ambit is inclusive rather than doctrinaire.
期刊最新文献
You as a stylistic vector of otherness: from self-ascription to enactment in Kincaid (1988), Adichie (2009) and Azumah Nelson (2021) Thackeray-type narrator revisited: portrayal of characters’ minds as narratorial performance in Vanity Fair Transitivity and agency in Richard Jefferies’s rural essays: an ecostylistic analysis Italian places in Japanese manga: a study on topophilia in graphic narratives “The unlikeliest twins”: the role of intertextual foregrounding and defamiliarisation in creating empathy in Meursault, contre-enquête
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1