Colorblind Racism and Market-Based Development

IF 1.3 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Sociology of Development Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1525/sod.2020.0035
Skye Niles
{"title":"Colorblind Racism and Market-Based Development","authors":"Skye Niles","doi":"10.1525/sod.2020.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past two decades, the range of efforts to address global poverty and development has expanded dramatically. Yet, many of these approaches foreground market-based development and extend harmful neoliberal practices. Scholars have critiqued these practices for expanding capitalism to new realms, while others are more optimistic about the potential benefits of markets. In this study, I add a racial analysis to this conversation, arguing that colorblind racism plays a key role in justifying market-based development practices and obscuring enduring racial inequalities in development. I focus on a growing subfield of development—development engineering education—to demonstrate how colorblind racism informs students’ and practitioners’ approaches to development. Through interviews and observations of two development engineering programs and affiliated development organizations, I found that students and practitioners employed colorblind frameworks to legitimize market-based development, embracing the market as a seemingly race-neutral mechanism, in contrast to the overt racism that they connected to development aid. This research shows that to understand the popularity of neoliberal approaches to development, it is necessary to attend to how colorblind racism lends support to market-based practices. Further, this study illustrates the need to address multiple and mutating forms of racism in development.","PeriodicalId":36869,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2020.0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the range of efforts to address global poverty and development has expanded dramatically. Yet, many of these approaches foreground market-based development and extend harmful neoliberal practices. Scholars have critiqued these practices for expanding capitalism to new realms, while others are more optimistic about the potential benefits of markets. In this study, I add a racial analysis to this conversation, arguing that colorblind racism plays a key role in justifying market-based development practices and obscuring enduring racial inequalities in development. I focus on a growing subfield of development—development engineering education—to demonstrate how colorblind racism informs students’ and practitioners’ approaches to development. Through interviews and observations of two development engineering programs and affiliated development organizations, I found that students and practitioners employed colorblind frameworks to legitimize market-based development, embracing the market as a seemingly race-neutral mechanism, in contrast to the overt racism that they connected to development aid. This research shows that to understand the popularity of neoliberal approaches to development, it is necessary to attend to how colorblind racism lends support to market-based practices. Further, this study illustrates the need to address multiple and mutating forms of racism in development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不分肤色的种族主义和市场化发展
过去二十年来,解决全球贫困与发展问题的努力范围急剧扩大。然而,这些方法中的许多都强调以市场为基础的发展,并扩展了有害的新自由主义实践。学者们批评这些做法将资本主义扩展到新的领域,而其他人则对市场的潜在好处更为乐观。在本研究中,我在这一对话中加入了种族分析,认为不分肤色的种族主义在为基于市场的发展实践辩护和掩盖发展中长期存在的种族不平等方面发挥着关键作用。我将重点放在发展的一个日益增长的分支领域——发展工程教育上,以展示不分肤色的种族主义如何影响学生和实践者的发展方法。通过对两个开发工程项目和附属开发组织的采访和观察,我发现学生和从业者采用不分肤色的框架来使基于市场的发展合法化,将市场视为一种看似种族中立的机制,与他们将公然的种族主义与发展援助联系起来形成鲜明对比。这项研究表明,要理解新自由主义发展方法的流行,有必要关注种族主义如何为市场实践提供支持。此外,这项研究表明,需要解决发展中多种多样和不断变化的种族主义形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sociology of Development
Sociology of Development Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Militarization, Risk, and the Environment Layered Logic From Booms to Bans The Complex Reality of National Park Development under Authoritarianism Hydropower Plant Construction and Resettlement in Nghệ An, Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1