Erweiterung der Flexibilität von Biogasanlagen – Substratmanagement, Fahrplansynthese und ökonomische Bewertung

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Landtechnik Pub Date : 2016-12-16 DOI:10.15150/LT.2016.3146
Tino Barchmann, Eric Mauky, M. Dotzauer, Mathias Stur, Sören Weinrich, H. Jacobi, Jan Liebetrau, M. Nelles
{"title":"Erweiterung der Flexibilität von Biogasanlagen – Substratmanagement, Fahrplansynthese und ökonomische Bewertung","authors":"Tino Barchmann, Eric Mauky, M. Dotzauer, Mathias Stur, Sören Weinrich, H. Jacobi, Jan Liebetrau, M. Nelles","doi":"10.15150/LT.2016.3146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the amendment of the German Renewable Energy Act (EEG) in 2012 as well as in the current version (EEG 2014) the parameters for the expansion of renewable energies aim for a stronger market integration of those. Thereby, biogas plants represent a promising option to produce demand-driven energy to compensate differences between energy demand and energy supply caused by irregular sources (e. g. wind and solar). The contribution focuses on the economic assessment of the flexible biogas production by specific feeding in comparison to continuous gas production against the background of a flexible conversion of biogas into electrical power. The required additional demand for gas storage capacity of a model biogas plant is determined by combinations of different feeding regimes and by three optimised power generation schedules. Subsequently, a cost-benefit analysis is conducted to assess the substrate management economically. The developed methodology is especially designed for existing plants and is used for assessing a multi-factorial substrate management as flexibility option. The results show that substrate management is increasingly appropriate to reduce the additional demand for gas storage especially for longer-term planning horizons (above 12 h) regarding schedule organisation. Moreover, the flexible operation allows generating higher marketing revenues on the European Power Exchange (EPEX Spot SE) at low additional costs.","PeriodicalId":35524,"journal":{"name":"Landtechnik","volume":"71 1","pages":"233-251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landtechnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15150/LT.2016.3146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Since the amendment of the German Renewable Energy Act (EEG) in 2012 as well as in the current version (EEG 2014) the parameters for the expansion of renewable energies aim for a stronger market integration of those. Thereby, biogas plants represent a promising option to produce demand-driven energy to compensate differences between energy demand and energy supply caused by irregular sources (e. g. wind and solar). The contribution focuses on the economic assessment of the flexible biogas production by specific feeding in comparison to continuous gas production against the background of a flexible conversion of biogas into electrical power. The required additional demand for gas storage capacity of a model biogas plant is determined by combinations of different feeding regimes and by three optimised power generation schedules. Subsequently, a cost-benefit analysis is conducted to assess the substrate management economically. The developed methodology is especially designed for existing plants and is used for assessing a multi-factorial substrate management as flexibility option. The results show that substrate management is increasingly appropriate to reduce the additional demand for gas storage especially for longer-term planning horizons (above 12 h) regarding schedule organisation. Moreover, the flexible operation allows generating higher marketing revenues on the European Power Exchange (EPEX Spot SE) at low additional costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进生物调剂管理、驾驶合成和经济评估的灵活性
自2012年修订德国可再生能源法案(EEG)以及当前版本(EEG 2014)以来,可再生能源扩张的参数旨在加强市场整合。因此,沼气厂是一种很有前途的选择,可以生产需求驱动的能源,以弥补能源需求和能源供应之间的差异。风能和太阳能)。该贡献侧重于通过特定投料进行灵活的沼气生产的经济评估,并将其与在沼气灵活转化为电力的背景下连续生产的沼气进行比较。模型沼气厂对储气能力的额外需求是由不同供气方式的组合和三个优化的发电计划决定的。随后,进行了成本效益分析,以经济地评估基材管理。所开发的方法是专门为现有工厂设计的,用于评估多因素基质管理作为灵活性选择。结果表明,基质管理越来越适合于减少对天然气储存的额外需求,特别是对于长期规划期限(超过12小时)的计划组织。此外,灵活的操作可以在欧洲电力交易所(EPEX Spot SE)以较低的额外成本产生更高的营销收入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Landtechnik
Landtechnik Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Untersuchung zur Desintegration von Gärmedien in einer parallel betriebenen Pilotbiogasanlage Umsetzung einer prädiktiven Fahrstrategie durch radarbasierte Steigungserkennung in Traktoren Development and evaluation of a device to incorporate biodegradable textiles into sports turfs Gärrestaufbereitung als Beitrag zur Nährstoffentfrachtung von Überschussregionen – Kosten und Treibhausgasemissionen Food-scanner applications in the fruit and vegetable sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1