Characteristics of Legal Reasoning in Cases Regarding Liability of Internet Intermediaries

Teise Pub Date : 2022-07-05 DOI:10.15388/teise.2022.123.4
Johanas Baltrimas
{"title":"Characteristics of Legal Reasoning in Cases Regarding Liability of Internet Intermediaries","authors":"Johanas Baltrimas","doi":"10.15388/teise.2022.123.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper is focused on identifying criteria for legal reasoning used by courts in disputes regarding internet intermediary‘s liability for offences committed by someone else. There are cases with this atypical phenomenon when a person, who did not infringe someone else‘s individual rights, is held liable, e. g. liability of an internet platform‘s operator for unlawful comments posted by the visitors. The paper presents an analysis of criteria for legal reasoning which carry potential to be used in the future when new disputes related to technological innovation reach courts.","PeriodicalId":33051,"journal":{"name":"Teise","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/teise.2022.123.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper is focused on identifying criteria for legal reasoning used by courts in disputes regarding internet intermediary‘s liability for offences committed by someone else. There are cases with this atypical phenomenon when a person, who did not infringe someone else‘s individual rights, is held liable, e. g. liability of an internet platform‘s operator for unlawful comments posted by the visitors. The paper presents an analysis of criteria for legal reasoning which carry potential to be used in the future when new disputes related to technological innovation reach courts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络中介责任案件的法律推理特征
本文的重点是确定法院在有关互联网中介对他人所犯罪行的责任的纠纷中使用的法律推理标准。在某些情况下,没有侵犯他人个人权利的人要承担责任,例如,互联网平台的经营者要为访问者发布的非法评论承担责任。本文对法律推理标准进行了分析,这些标准在将来与技术创新有关的新纠纷到达法院时可能会被使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Consumer Law and Environmental Protection: Consumer Sales Directive 2019/771 Example The Doctrine of Provocation Defence and a Murder Based on Jealousy Lay Evaluations of Restraints and Prohibitions During the 1st, 2nd, and 4th Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Lithuania New European Union’s Regulatory Framework of the Digital Space: the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act The Effect of Time Pressure on Criminal Decision-Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1