Comparative Study of Vessel Detection Methods for Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography: Effects of Convolutional Neural Network Architecture and Patch Size

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Advanced Biomedical Engineering Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.14326/abe.10.138
Yuki Suzuki, M. Hori, S. Kido, Y. Otake, Mariko Ono, N. Tomiyama, Yoshinobu Sato
{"title":"Comparative Study of Vessel Detection Methods for Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography: Effects of Convolutional Neural Network Architecture and Patch Size","authors":"Yuki Suzuki, M. Hori, S. Kido, Y. Otake, Mariko Ono, N. Tomiyama, Yoshinobu Sato","doi":"10.14326/abe.10.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Segmenting blood vessels is an important step in a wide variety of tasks in medical image analysis. Patch-based convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are often used for vascular detection, but the impact of patch size and choice of CNN architecture have not been addressed in detail in previous studies. In this study, we aim to investigate the impact of patch size and CNN architecture on the accuracy of vascular detection from contract enhanced computed tomography (CT). We targeted the renal arteries as the primary focus of detection. We conducted experiments using contrast enhanced abdominal CT data of 30 cases. For the experiments, arteries in pre-de ned regions of interest were manually labeled to build a dataset of input CT images and ground truth labels. We repeated the experiments with four patch sizes and two patch-based 3D CNN architectures (U-Net-like model and a simple sequential model) and evaluated the differences. Moreover, a Hessian-based line enhancing method was included in the evaluation to compare this non-deep learning method with the CNNs. The experimental results showed that patch size had a signi cant impact on detection accuracy. U-Netlike model showed peak accuracy at a certain patch size, unlike the sequential model that plateaued at large patch sizes. Although both CNNs outperformed Hessian-based line enhancement by a large margin, Hessianbased line enhancement achieved good recall when enhancing vessel structures not included in the CNN training. Our experiments show that different network architectures have different characteristics regarding their response to various patch sizes and vessel structures unseen during training.","PeriodicalId":54017,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14326/abe.10.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Segmenting blood vessels is an important step in a wide variety of tasks in medical image analysis. Patch-based convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are often used for vascular detection, but the impact of patch size and choice of CNN architecture have not been addressed in detail in previous studies. In this study, we aim to investigate the impact of patch size and CNN architecture on the accuracy of vascular detection from contract enhanced computed tomography (CT). We targeted the renal arteries as the primary focus of detection. We conducted experiments using contrast enhanced abdominal CT data of 30 cases. For the experiments, arteries in pre-de ned regions of interest were manually labeled to build a dataset of input CT images and ground truth labels. We repeated the experiments with four patch sizes and two patch-based 3D CNN architectures (U-Net-like model and a simple sequential model) and evaluated the differences. Moreover, a Hessian-based line enhancing method was included in the evaluation to compare this non-deep learning method with the CNNs. The experimental results showed that patch size had a signi cant impact on detection accuracy. U-Netlike model showed peak accuracy at a certain patch size, unlike the sequential model that plateaued at large patch sizes. Although both CNNs outperformed Hessian-based line enhancement by a large margin, Hessianbased line enhancement achieved good recall when enhancing vessel structures not included in the CNN training. Our experiments show that different network architectures have different characteristics regarding their response to various patch sizes and vessel structures unseen during training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对比增强计算机断层扫描血管检测方法的比较研究:卷积神经网络结构和斑块大小的影响
血管分割是医学图像分析中重要的一步。基于patch的卷积神经网络(CNN)常用于血管检测,但在以往的研究中,对patch大小和CNN结构选择的影响并没有详细的研究。在这项研究中,我们的目的是研究贴片大小和CNN结构对收缩增强计算机断层扫描(CT)血管检测准确性的影响。我们将肾动脉作为主要的检测重点。我们利用30例腹部CT增强数据进行实验。在实验中,预先定义的感兴趣区域的动脉被手动标记,以构建输入CT图像和地面真值标记的数据集。我们用四种补丁大小和两种基于补丁的3D CNN架构(类似u - net的模型和简单的顺序模型)重复实验,并评估差异。此外,在评估中加入了一种基于hessian的线增强方法,将这种非深度学习方法与cnn进行比较。实验结果表明,贴片大小对检测精度影响不显著。u - net模型在一定的斑块大小下显示出峰值精度,而序列模型在较大的斑块大小下趋于平稳。尽管这两种CNN都大大优于基于hessian的线增强,但在增强CNN训练中未包含的血管结构时,基于hessian的线增强取得了很好的召回率。我们的实验表明,不同的网络架构在对不同的补丁大小和训练中看不见的血管结构的响应方面具有不同的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advanced Biomedical Engineering
Advanced Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
SATORI: Amplification-free digital RNA detection method for the diagnosis of viral infections. Basic Investigation of the Effect of Insole Shape on Leg Skeletal Muscle Mass and Pressure Changes during Walking Investigating Mental Task Combination for Brain-Computer Interface Based on Brain State Discrimination Using Subjective Ratings Development of Beat Analysis Software for the Non-invasive Evaluation of Cardiac Constructs Fabricated with a Three-dimensional Bioprinter Transepidermal Water Loss Estimation Model for Evaluating Skin Barrier Function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1