Evaluation of Panfungal Marker (1,3)-⃞-D-Glucanin Diagnosis of Invasive Infections with Candida Species

Gordana Mirchevska, Z. Cekovska, E. Trajkovska-Dokic, M. Petrovska, N. Panovski
{"title":"Evaluation of Panfungal Marker (1,3)-⃞-D-Glucanin Diagnosis of Invasive Infections with Candida Species","authors":"Gordana Mirchevska, Z. Cekovska, E. Trajkovska-Dokic, M. Petrovska, N. Panovski","doi":"10.1515/mmr-2016-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction. Although blood culture is considered a gold standard in diagnosis of invasive infections, it is still not reliable and fast enough for diagnosis of candidemia. Determination of serum (1,3)-⃞-D-glucan is a highly sensitive and specific test for invasive mycosis, and could probably be of benefit to patients with high risk for invasive infections with Candida species. Aim. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum (1.3)-⃞-Dglucan BDG (Fungitell) assay, in comparison with blood culture, for diagnosis of invasive infections with Candida species. Methods. Blood and sera from 120 patients divided in 4 groups, hospitalized at the University clinics in Skopje, during a 2-year period, were investigated for invasive Candida infections. Blood was examined with conventional methods (automated BacT/Alert system, Gram stain and culture on fungal media). Identification of Candida species was performed with VITEK-2 system. Serum (1,3)-⃞-D-glucan was determined by means of Fungitell assay. Results. Positive blood culture was registered in 23.33%, 43.33%, 23.8% and in 3.33% of samples only in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. Positive findings with (1,3)-⃞-D-glucan Fungitell assay at the same time with blood culture were detected in 83.33%, 76.67%, 30% and 26.67% in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. The average concentration of BDG was highest in group I, followed by group II, group IV and group III. Conclusion. Our results suggest that a positive (1,3)-⃞-D-glucan assay could be a superior test in addition to the blood culture for diagnosis of candidemia and highlights the value of this test as a diagnostic adjunct in the serodiagnosis of an invasive candidiasis.","PeriodicalId":86800,"journal":{"name":"Makedonski medicinski pregled. Revue medicale macedonienne","volume":"70 1","pages":"75 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Makedonski medicinski pregled. Revue medicale macedonienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mmr-2016-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. Although blood culture is considered a gold standard in diagnosis of invasive infections, it is still not reliable and fast enough for diagnosis of candidemia. Determination of serum (1,3)-⃞-D-glucan is a highly sensitive and specific test for invasive mycosis, and could probably be of benefit to patients with high risk for invasive infections with Candida species. Aim. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum (1.3)-⃞-Dglucan BDG (Fungitell) assay, in comparison with blood culture, for diagnosis of invasive infections with Candida species. Methods. Blood and sera from 120 patients divided in 4 groups, hospitalized at the University clinics in Skopje, during a 2-year period, were investigated for invasive Candida infections. Blood was examined with conventional methods (automated BacT/Alert system, Gram stain and culture on fungal media). Identification of Candida species was performed with VITEK-2 system. Serum (1,3)-⃞-D-glucan was determined by means of Fungitell assay. Results. Positive blood culture was registered in 23.33%, 43.33%, 23.8% and in 3.33% of samples only in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. Positive findings with (1,3)-⃞-D-glucan Fungitell assay at the same time with blood culture were detected in 83.33%, 76.67%, 30% and 26.67% in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. The average concentration of BDG was highest in group I, followed by group II, group IV and group III. Conclusion. Our results suggest that a positive (1,3)-⃞-D-glucan assay could be a superior test in addition to the blood culture for diagnosis of candidemia and highlights the value of this test as a diagnostic adjunct in the serodiagnosis of an invasive candidiasis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泛真菌标志物(1,3)-⃞- d -葡聚糖对假丝酵母菌侵袭性感染的诊断价值
摘要介绍。虽然血培养被认为是诊断侵袭性感染的金标准,但它对念珠菌的诊断仍然不够可靠和快速。血清(1,3)-⃞- d -葡聚糖的测定是一种高度敏感和特异性的侵袭性真菌病检测方法,可能对念珠菌侵袭性感染的高风险患者有益。的目标。本研究的目的是前瞻性评价血清(1.3)-⃞-葡聚糖BDG (Fungitell)检测与血培养对假丝酵母菌侵袭性感染的诊断效果。方法。对2年期间在斯科普里大学诊所住院的120名分为4组的患者的血液和血清进行侵袭性念珠菌感染调查。采用常规方法(自动BacT/Alert系统、革兰氏染色和真菌培养基培养)检测血液。采用VITEK-2系统对念珠菌进行菌种鉴定。血清(1,3)-⃞- d -葡聚糖采用真菌细胞法测定。结果。仅I、II、III、IV组血培养阳性率分别为23.33%、43.33%、23.8%和3.33%。与血培养同时进行(1,3)-⃞- d -葡聚糖真菌试验的阳性检出率分别为83.33%、76.67%、30%和26.67%。BDG平均浓度以ⅰ组最高,其次为ⅱ组、ⅳ组和ⅲ组。结论。我们的研究结果表明,阳性(1,3)-⃞- d -葡聚糖检测可能是除血培养外诊断念珠菌病的一种更好的检测方法,并突出了该检测作为侵袭性念珠菌病血清诊断辅助诊断的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hypertension after Kidney Transplantation Case Report of Feminizing Genital Reconstruction in a Female with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with Remifentanil Versus Intermittent Epidural Boluses for Labor Analgesia Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Epileptic Seizures: Frequency, Localization and Seizures Types Reactive Stroma in Prostatic Carcinoma and Correlation with Tumor Grade and Tumor Stage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1