Two-Stage Revision for Infected Knee Endoprosthesis

Jasmin Ciriviri, Darko Talevski, Zoran Nestorovski, Tode Vraniskovski, Snezana Pechinkova-Misevska
{"title":"Two-Stage Revision for Infected Knee Endoprosthesis","authors":"Jasmin Ciriviri, Darko Talevski, Zoran Nestorovski, Tode Vraniskovski, Snezana Pechinkova-Misevska","doi":"10.1515/mmr-2015-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction. Two-stage revision surgery for infected knee endoprosthesis using antibiotic articulating spacer is the best possible standard in most of the orthopedic centers worldwide. Methods. In the period from 2008 to 2012 we treated 21 patients with infected knee endoprosthesis. We used a single protocol for diagnosis and treatment of infection which included x-ray examination, serological examination (sedimentation and CRP), fine needle aspiration of the joint with further microbiological and biochemical examination of the smear. The surgical treatment was consisted of taking samples for microbiological and histological examination, removing the implanted endoprosthesis and excision of the avascular and necrotic tissue, implantation of articular antibiotic spacer. The postoperative steps included administration of parenteral antibiotics according to the previously made antibiogram in a two-week period followed by two oral antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and rifampicin) in the next four to six weeks. The second-stage procedure was performed when there were no clinical and serological signs of infection. Removing of the antibiotic spacer and implanatation of primary or revision prosthesis according to bone deficit was performed. Results. In one patient the procedure was carried out three times, arthrodesis of the knee joint was made in one patient and in nineteen patients reimplantation was performed. One patient after reimplanation had reinfection after 6 months. The follow-up period of the patients was 36 months. The functional results according to the Knee society score: preoperative 36, postoperative 74. Conclusion. Two-phase treatment is satisfactory in treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. Articulated antibiotic loaded bone cement spacer is superior in eradication of local infection. It allows partial function of the joint and makes easier the second surgical intervention. Infection with Staphylococcus aureus is difficult to be treated with a higher percent of recidives.","PeriodicalId":86800,"journal":{"name":"Makedonski medicinski pregled. Revue medicale macedonienne","volume":"69 1","pages":"71 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Makedonski medicinski pregled. Revue medicale macedonienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/mmr-2015-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction. Two-stage revision surgery for infected knee endoprosthesis using antibiotic articulating spacer is the best possible standard in most of the orthopedic centers worldwide. Methods. In the period from 2008 to 2012 we treated 21 patients with infected knee endoprosthesis. We used a single protocol for diagnosis and treatment of infection which included x-ray examination, serological examination (sedimentation and CRP), fine needle aspiration of the joint with further microbiological and biochemical examination of the smear. The surgical treatment was consisted of taking samples for microbiological and histological examination, removing the implanted endoprosthesis and excision of the avascular and necrotic tissue, implantation of articular antibiotic spacer. The postoperative steps included administration of parenteral antibiotics according to the previously made antibiogram in a two-week period followed by two oral antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and rifampicin) in the next four to six weeks. The second-stage procedure was performed when there were no clinical and serological signs of infection. Removing of the antibiotic spacer and implanatation of primary or revision prosthesis according to bone deficit was performed. Results. In one patient the procedure was carried out three times, arthrodesis of the knee joint was made in one patient and in nineteen patients reimplantation was performed. One patient after reimplanation had reinfection after 6 months. The follow-up period of the patients was 36 months. The functional results according to the Knee society score: preoperative 36, postoperative 74. Conclusion. Two-phase treatment is satisfactory in treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. Articulated antibiotic loaded bone cement spacer is superior in eradication of local infection. It allows partial function of the joint and makes easier the second surgical intervention. Infection with Staphylococcus aureus is difficult to be treated with a higher percent of recidives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感染膝关节假体的两阶段修复
摘要介绍。使用抗生素关节垫片对感染的膝关节假体进行两阶段翻修手术是世界上大多数骨科中心的最佳标准。方法。在2008年至2012年期间,我们治疗了21例感染膝关节假体患者。我们采用单一的诊断和治疗方案,包括x线检查、血清学检查(沉淀物和CRP)、关节细针抽吸和进一步的涂片微生物学和生化检查。手术治疗包括采集标本进行微生物学和组织学检查,取出植入的假体,切除无血管和坏死组织,植入关节抗生素间隔器。术后步骤包括根据先前制作的抗生素谱在两周内给予肠外抗生素,然后在接下来的4至6周内口服两种抗生素(环丙沙星和利福平)。当没有临床和血清学感染体征时进行第二阶段手术。根据骨缺损情况取出抗生素垫片,植入初级或翻修假体。结果。1例患者手术进行了3次,1例患者进行了膝关节融合术,19例患者进行了再植术。1例患者术后6个月再次感染。随访36个月。膝关节功能评分:术前36分,术后74分。结论。两期治疗假体周围关节感染效果满意。关节式载抗生素骨水泥间隔器在根除局部感染方面具有优势。它允许部分关节功能,使第二次手术干预更容易。金黄色葡萄球菌感染难以治疗,复发率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hypertension after Kidney Transplantation Case Report of Feminizing Genital Reconstruction in a Female with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) with Remifentanil Versus Intermittent Epidural Boluses for Labor Analgesia Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Epileptic Seizures: Frequency, Localization and Seizures Types Reactive Stroma in Prostatic Carcinoma and Correlation with Tumor Grade and Tumor Stage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1