Do Probiotics Prevent Gestational Diabetes in Obese/Overweight patients? A Systematic Review

Christina Carfagnini
{"title":"Do Probiotics Prevent Gestational Diabetes in Obese/Overweight patients? A Systematic Review","authors":"Christina Carfagnini","doi":"10.15404/msrj/03.2023.236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: While some studies suggest probiotic supplements may prevent Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), it is unclear if probiotics effectively prevent GDM among overweight and obese patients. This systematic review synthesizes recommendations for clinical practice and future research by evaluating the quality of evidence regarding Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium containing probiotics to prevent GDM among obese and overweight patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched using appropriate MeSH terms. Results were limited to randomized controlled trials published between 2011 and 2021. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance after duplicates were removed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: studies that diagnosed GDM according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria, suspended probiotic use prior to intervention, excluded participants with altered glucose metabolism, included participants with a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m 2 , and provided a specified dose of probiotic supplements. Articles without statistical analysis were excluded. Resulting articles were critically appraised using Version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: This search strategy resulted in 24 articles after duplicates were removed. Five double-blind randomized controlled trials found that the incidence of GDM during the third trimester was not significantly different between probiotic and control groups. There was wide variation in the bacterial species, dose, and duration of probiotic treatments used. All studies have a high risk of bias due to non-adherence to the treatment. Discussion: This review used highly sensitive criteria for GDM diagnosis that may mask a preventative effect of probiotics. Noncompliance may bias results toward the null, given insufficient analysis of the effect of adhering to the intervention. No patterns between the length of probiotic intervention or probiotic species and improved glucose tolerance were noted. Conclusions: Current evidence is not sufficient to recommend probiotic supplements to prevent GDM in overweight and obese patients. Future evidence should address the effect of adhering to probiotic interventions and develop consistent probiotic intervention protocols.","PeriodicalId":91358,"journal":{"name":"Medical student research journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical student research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15404/msrj/03.2023.236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While some studies suggest probiotic supplements may prevent Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), it is unclear if probiotics effectively prevent GDM among overweight and obese patients. This systematic review synthesizes recommendations for clinical practice and future research by evaluating the quality of evidence regarding Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium containing probiotics to prevent GDM among obese and overweight patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched using appropriate MeSH terms. Results were limited to randomized controlled trials published between 2011 and 2021. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance after duplicates were removed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: studies that diagnosed GDM according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group criteria, suspended probiotic use prior to intervention, excluded participants with altered glucose metabolism, included participants with a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m 2 , and provided a specified dose of probiotic supplements. Articles without statistical analysis were excluded. Resulting articles were critically appraised using Version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: This search strategy resulted in 24 articles after duplicates were removed. Five double-blind randomized controlled trials found that the incidence of GDM during the third trimester was not significantly different between probiotic and control groups. There was wide variation in the bacterial species, dose, and duration of probiotic treatments used. All studies have a high risk of bias due to non-adherence to the treatment. Discussion: This review used highly sensitive criteria for GDM diagnosis that may mask a preventative effect of probiotics. Noncompliance may bias results toward the null, given insufficient analysis of the effect of adhering to the intervention. No patterns between the length of probiotic intervention or probiotic species and improved glucose tolerance were noted. Conclusions: Current evidence is not sufficient to recommend probiotic supplements to prevent GDM in overweight and obese patients. Future evidence should address the effect of adhering to probiotic interventions and develop consistent probiotic intervention protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
益生菌能预防肥胖/超重患者的妊娠糖尿病吗?系统回顾
虽然一些研究表明益生菌补充剂可以预防妊娠糖尿病(GDM),但目前尚不清楚益生菌是否能有效预防超重和肥胖患者的GDM。本系统综述通过评价含有益生菌的乳酸菌和双歧杆菌预防肥胖和超重患者GDM的证据质量,综合了临床实践和未来研究的建议。方法:采用合适的MeSH检索词检索PubMed、Embase、CINAHL和Web of Science。结果仅限于2011年至2021年间发表的随机对照试验。在删除重复内容后,对标题和摘要进行相关性筛选。纳入标准如下:根据国际糖尿病与妊娠协会研究组标准诊断为GDM的研究,干预前暂停使用益生菌,排除糖代谢改变的参与者,纳入体重指数≥25 kg/ m2的参与者,并提供指定剂量的益生菌补充剂。未进行统计分析的文章被排除。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具第2版对结果文章进行批判性评价。结果:该搜索策略在删除重复后得到24篇文章。五项双盲随机对照试验发现,益生菌组与对照组妊娠晚期GDM的发生率无显著差异。使用益生菌治疗的细菌种类、剂量和持续时间有很大差异。由于不坚持治疗,所有的研究都有很高的偏倚风险。讨论:本综述使用了高度敏感的GDM诊断标准,这可能掩盖了益生菌的预防作用。由于对坚持干预的效果分析不充分,不依从性可能使结果偏向无效。益生菌干预时间或益生菌种类与葡萄糖耐量改善之间没有关系。结论:目前的证据不足以推荐益生菌补充剂预防超重和肥胖患者的GDM。未来的证据应该解决坚持益生菌干预的效果,并制定一致的益生菌干预方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pendekatan Historis dan Pragmatis Industri dan IKM di Kota Gresik Penyelesaian Sengketa Investasi Asing Melalui Mekanisme Arbitrase Internasional (Studi Kasus: Rafat Ali Rizvi Melawan Republik Indonesia) Analisis Struktur Industri Unggulan Terhadap Perkembangan Ekonomi Di Kota Pekalongan Jawa Tengah Pemenuhan Penilaian Aspek Transaksi Berjaminan Dalam Business Ready (B-READY) Sebagai Upaya Perbaikan Iklim Investasi Indonesia Pengaruh Industri Pengolahan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Jawa Timur
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1