Intra-organizational antecedents of talent management in the context of positive organizational scholarship: a study of companies operating in Poland

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Argumenta Oeconomica Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.15611/aoe.2020.2.10
Monika Chodorek, R. Haffer, A. Lis
{"title":"Intra-organizational antecedents of talent management in the context of positive organizational scholarship: a study of companies operating in Poland","authors":"Monika Chodorek, R. Haffer, A. Lis","doi":"10.15611/aoe.2020.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"** Institute of Management, WSB University in Torun. ** Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun. Purpose: The aim of the study is to empirically validate the influence of talent management antecedents identified in the literature. The concept of talent management is discussed in the context of Positive Organizational Scholarship. This idea helped to prepare a more accurate enumeration of the antecedents of talent management presented in the literature. The analysis of the literature was the basis for developing a set of propositions which constitute the model to be tested empirically. Methodology: The analyses presented in this paper were supported by the data collected in the questionnaire survey conducted among companies operating in Poland in 2012. The examined sample consisted of 73 organizations. Pearson correlation and partial least squares (PLS) path modelling were applied to analyze the causal relations between the variables. Findings: The analysis positively validated the cause-effect relationships between talent management and the following antecedents: talent management infrastructure and organizational culture, organization strategy, and internal communication. Research limitations: The study was limited to companies operating in Poland which established a specific cultural context. The relatively small research sample was another constraint. Therefore, the findings cannot be automatically extended to other organizations. Moreover, in order to reduce the observed ambiguity between causes and effects, quantitative studies should be supported by qualitative surveys based on the case study methodology. Originality/value: The outcomes of the study contribute to the field through the empirical testing of the theoretical assumptions concerning the antecedents of talent management.","PeriodicalId":43088,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Oeconomica","volume":"2020 1","pages":"231-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumenta Oeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2020.2.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

** Institute of Management, WSB University in Torun. ** Faculty of Economic Sciences and Management, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun. Purpose: The aim of the study is to empirically validate the influence of talent management antecedents identified in the literature. The concept of talent management is discussed in the context of Positive Organizational Scholarship. This idea helped to prepare a more accurate enumeration of the antecedents of talent management presented in the literature. The analysis of the literature was the basis for developing a set of propositions which constitute the model to be tested empirically. Methodology: The analyses presented in this paper were supported by the data collected in the questionnaire survey conducted among companies operating in Poland in 2012. The examined sample consisted of 73 organizations. Pearson correlation and partial least squares (PLS) path modelling were applied to analyze the causal relations between the variables. Findings: The analysis positively validated the cause-effect relationships between talent management and the following antecedents: talent management infrastructure and organizational culture, organization strategy, and internal communication. Research limitations: The study was limited to companies operating in Poland which established a specific cultural context. The relatively small research sample was another constraint. Therefore, the findings cannot be automatically extended to other organizations. Moreover, in order to reduce the observed ambiguity between causes and effects, quantitative studies should be supported by qualitative surveys based on the case study methodology. Originality/value: The outcomes of the study contribute to the field through the empirical testing of the theoretical assumptions concerning the antecedents of talent management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极的组织学术背景下人才管理的组织内部先决条件:对在波兰经营的公司的研究
**托伦WSB大学管理学院。**托伦尼古拉斯·哥白尼大学经济科学与管理学院。目的:本研究的目的是实证验证文献中确定的人才管理前因的影响。在积极组织学术的背景下讨论了人才管理的概念。这个想法有助于更准确地列举文献中提出的人才管理的先决条件。对文献的分析是发展一组命题的基础,这些命题构成了要进行经验检验的模型。方法:本文的分析得到了2012年在波兰经营的公司的问卷调查数据的支持。调查样本包括73个组织。应用Pearson相关和偏最小二乘(PLS)路径模型分析变量之间的因果关系。研究发现:人才管理与人才管理基础设施与组织文化、组织战略、内部沟通等前因之间存在正向因果关系。研究局限:该研究仅限于在波兰经营的公司,这些公司建立了特定的文化背景。相对较小的研究样本是另一个制约因素。因此,调查结果不能自动推广到其他组织。此外,为了减少观察到的因果之间的模糊性,定量研究应以案例研究方法为基础的定性调查为基础。原创性/价值:通过对人才管理前因的理论假设进行实证检验,研究结果对该领域有所贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION: AN ECONOMIC TRANSPOSITION The Post-Covid Crisis and Its Effects on Education Nobel Laureate, Joseph Stiglitz, On Economic Challenges after Covid-19 Circularity – an Essential Component in the Transition Towards Climatic Neutrality Main Categories of Operational Risks in Banking. Methods Used by Financial Institutions to Identify, Prevent and Mitigate Risk Events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1