Covid-19 led to price slumps in the German stock market. Is sentiment applicable as an explanatory factor?

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Argumenta Oeconomica Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.15611/aoe.2022.1.01
Emile David Hövel, Matthias Gehrke
{"title":"Covid-19 led to price slumps in the German stock market. Is sentiment applicable as an explanatory factor?","authors":"Emile David Hövel, Matthias Gehrke","doi":"10.15611/aoe.2022.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Explaining and forecasting returns and other statistical moments of returns in the stock market have always been critical challenges. Recent studies postulate a relation between investor sentiment and future stock market returns. Supported by evidence from other countries, this study explores the statistical moments of stock returns in Germany and analyses to what extent an explanation can be found through investor sentiment. The recent COVID-19 induced market distortions provide an opportunity to investigate the suitability of predictive sentiment-based analyses. These are presented in this study and appear to be meaningful. The main concept behind the sentiment-based return explanation is built on the assumption that stock returns are linked to investor psychology. This theory often serves as an explanation for market movements that cannot be explained by fundamental data which are directly linked to stocks. However, the extraction of various sentiment proxies for further analysis in statistical models remains challenging. Problems occur because sentiment proxies do not have a constant influence and depend greatly on what currently drives the market. Furthermore, the correlation between sentiment indicators varies over time, especially in times of market distress. In this study, 73 sentiment indicators were examined in the aggregate with regard to the explainability of future stock market return distribution moments such as mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis. This study examines 169 one-month periods from 2006 to 2020 and shows a potential solution to these challenges by applying a neural network based on long short-term memory (LSTM) neurons. The authors were able to identify a good model fit and reasonable forecasting power, which seem to work particularly well in trend forecasting. The results can be valuable in the area of portfolio risk management.","PeriodicalId":43088,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Oeconomica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumenta Oeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2022.1.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Explaining and forecasting returns and other statistical moments of returns in the stock market have always been critical challenges. Recent studies postulate a relation between investor sentiment and future stock market returns. Supported by evidence from other countries, this study explores the statistical moments of stock returns in Germany and analyses to what extent an explanation can be found through investor sentiment. The recent COVID-19 induced market distortions provide an opportunity to investigate the suitability of predictive sentiment-based analyses. These are presented in this study and appear to be meaningful. The main concept behind the sentiment-based return explanation is built on the assumption that stock returns are linked to investor psychology. This theory often serves as an explanation for market movements that cannot be explained by fundamental data which are directly linked to stocks. However, the extraction of various sentiment proxies for further analysis in statistical models remains challenging. Problems occur because sentiment proxies do not have a constant influence and depend greatly on what currently drives the market. Furthermore, the correlation between sentiment indicators varies over time, especially in times of market distress. In this study, 73 sentiment indicators were examined in the aggregate with regard to the explainability of future stock market return distribution moments such as mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis. This study examines 169 one-month periods from 2006 to 2020 and shows a potential solution to these challenges by applying a neural network based on long short-term memory (LSTM) neurons. The authors were able to identify a good model fit and reasonable forecasting power, which seem to work particularly well in trend forecasting. The results can be valuable in the area of portfolio risk management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情导致德国股市暴跌。情绪是否可以作为一个解释因素?
解释和预测股票市场的收益和其他统计收益时刻一直是关键的挑战。最近的研究假设投资者情绪与未来股市回报之间存在关系。在其他国家证据的支持下,本研究探讨了德国股票收益的统计时刻,并分析了在多大程度上可以通过投资者情绪找到解释。最近新冠肺炎引发的市场扭曲为调查基于情绪的预测分析的适用性提供了机会。这些都在本研究中提出,似乎是有意义的。基于情绪的回报解释背后的主要概念是建立在股票回报与投资者心理相关的假设之上的。这一理论经常被用来解释那些不能用与股票直接相关的基本数据来解释的市场走势。然而,在统计模型中提取各种情绪代理以进行进一步分析仍然具有挑战性。问题的发生是因为情绪代理没有持续的影响,很大程度上取决于当前驱动市场的因素。此外,情绪指标之间的相关性随着时间的推移而变化,尤其是在市场低迷时期。在这项研究中,73个情绪指标在总体上检验了未来股市收益分布时刻的可解释性,如均值、方差、偏度和峰度。本研究考察了从2006年到2020年169个月的时间段,并展示了一种基于长短期记忆(LSTM)神经元的神经网络的潜在解决方案。作者能够确定一个良好的模型拟合和合理的预测能力,这似乎特别适用于趋势预测。结果在投资组合风险管理领域是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION: AN ECONOMIC TRANSPOSITION The Post-Covid Crisis and Its Effects on Education Nobel Laureate, Joseph Stiglitz, On Economic Challenges after Covid-19 Circularity – an Essential Component in the Transition Towards Climatic Neutrality Main Categories of Operational Risks in Banking. Methods Used by Financial Institutions to Identify, Prevent and Mitigate Risk Events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1