William N. Bernhard MD , Lisa Miller Schalick RN, MPH , Alan Gittelsohn PhD
{"title":"Dexamethasone for prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness during rapid ascent to 5334 m","authors":"William N. Bernhard MD , Lisa Miller Schalick RN, MPH , Alan Gittelsohn PhD","doi":"10.1580/0953-9859-5.3.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Twenty-three volunteers participated in a double-blind, randomized trial comparing the steroid dexamethasone 4<!--> <!-->mg to placebo every 12 h as prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness (AMS) during a rapid ascent to a shelter on Mt Chaclataya, Bolivia. From sea level, subjects were transported by air and land vehicles to 5334 m within a 72-h period. They were evaluated by cerebral scores derived from the Environmental Symptom Questionnaire and confirmed by AMS-C and AMS-R scores. After 6–8 h at high altitude (day 3), the number of ill persons in the dexamethasone group was less than those ill in the placebo group (χ<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->7.43, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01) by chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. After 20 h at high altitude (day 4), the contrast between groups diminished (χ<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.10, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.214). ANOVA and <em>t</em>-test showed that mean cumulative AMS scores of the dexamethasone group were significantly lower (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02) than those of the placebo group for both days at high altitude, despite an approximate 82% increase in the mean cumulative score of the dexamethasone group from day 3 to day 4. We conclude that dexamethasone 4 mg every 12 h, though initially effective, was not sufficient to sustain prophylaxis from AMS symptoms at 5334 m.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wilderness medicine","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 331-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1580/0953-9859-5.3.331","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wilderness medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953985994711335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Twenty-three volunteers participated in a double-blind, randomized trial comparing the steroid dexamethasone 4 mg to placebo every 12 h as prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness (AMS) during a rapid ascent to a shelter on Mt Chaclataya, Bolivia. From sea level, subjects were transported by air and land vehicles to 5334 m within a 72-h period. They were evaluated by cerebral scores derived from the Environmental Symptom Questionnaire and confirmed by AMS-C and AMS-R scores. After 6–8 h at high altitude (day 3), the number of ill persons in the dexamethasone group was less than those ill in the placebo group (χ2 = 7.43, p = 0.01) by chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. After 20 h at high altitude (day 4), the contrast between groups diminished (χ2 = 2.10, p = 0.214). ANOVA and t-test showed that mean cumulative AMS scores of the dexamethasone group were significantly lower (p = 0.01, p = 0.02) than those of the placebo group for both days at high altitude, despite an approximate 82% increase in the mean cumulative score of the dexamethasone group from day 3 to day 4. We conclude that dexamethasone 4 mg every 12 h, though initially effective, was not sufficient to sustain prophylaxis from AMS symptoms at 5334 m.