Dexamethasone for prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness during rapid ascent to 5334 m

William N. Bernhard MD , Lisa Miller Schalick RN, MPH , Alan Gittelsohn PhD
{"title":"Dexamethasone for prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness during rapid ascent to 5334 m","authors":"William N. Bernhard MD ,&nbsp;Lisa Miller Schalick RN, MPH ,&nbsp;Alan Gittelsohn PhD","doi":"10.1580/0953-9859-5.3.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Twenty-three volunteers participated in a double-blind, randomized trial comparing the steroid dexamethasone 4<!--> <!-->mg to placebo every 12 h as prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness (AMS) during a rapid ascent to a shelter on Mt Chaclataya, Bolivia. From sea level, subjects were transported by air and land vehicles to 5334 m within a 72-h period. They were evaluated by cerebral scores derived from the Environmental Symptom Questionnaire and confirmed by AMS-C and AMS-R scores. After 6–8 h at high altitude (day 3), the number of ill persons in the dexamethasone group was less than those ill in the placebo group (χ<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->7.43, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01) by chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. After 20 h at high altitude (day 4), the contrast between groups diminished (χ<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->2.10, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.214). ANOVA and <em>t</em>-test showed that mean cumulative AMS scores of the dexamethasone group were significantly lower (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02) than those of the placebo group for both days at high altitude, despite an approximate 82% increase in the mean cumulative score of the dexamethasone group from day 3 to day 4. We conclude that dexamethasone 4 mg every 12 h, though initially effective, was not sufficient to sustain prophylaxis from AMS symptoms at 5334 m.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wilderness medicine","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 331-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1580/0953-9859-5.3.331","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wilderness medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953985994711335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Twenty-three volunteers participated in a double-blind, randomized trial comparing the steroid dexamethasone 4 mg to placebo every 12 h as prophylaxis against acute mountain sickness (AMS) during a rapid ascent to a shelter on Mt Chaclataya, Bolivia. From sea level, subjects were transported by air and land vehicles to 5334 m within a 72-h period. They were evaluated by cerebral scores derived from the Environmental Symptom Questionnaire and confirmed by AMS-C and AMS-R scores. After 6–8 h at high altitude (day 3), the number of ill persons in the dexamethasone group was less than those ill in the placebo group (χ2 = 7.43, p = 0.01) by chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. After 20 h at high altitude (day 4), the contrast between groups diminished (χ2 = 2.10, p = 0.214). ANOVA and t-test showed that mean cumulative AMS scores of the dexamethasone group were significantly lower (p = 0.01, p = 0.02) than those of the placebo group for both days at high altitude, despite an approximate 82% increase in the mean cumulative score of the dexamethasone group from day 3 to day 4. We conclude that dexamethasone 4 mg every 12 h, though initially effective, was not sufficient to sustain prophylaxis from AMS symptoms at 5334 m.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地塞米松预防快速上升至5334米的急性高山病
23名志愿者参加了一项双盲随机试验,在玻利维亚恰克拉塔亚山的一个避难所快速攀登期间,每12小时比较类固醇地塞米松4mg和安慰剂预防急性高原反应(AMS)。在72 h的时间内,受试者通过空中和陆地交通工具从海平面运送到5334 m。采用环境症状问卷的大脑评分进行评估,并采用AMS-C和AMS-R评分进行确认。经卡方检验和Fisher精确检验,高海拔6 ~ 8 h(第3天)地塞米松组发病人数明显少于安慰剂组(χ2 = 7.43, p = 0.01)。在高海拔20 h(第4天)后,组间对比降低(χ2 = 2.10, p = 0.214)。方差分析和t检验显示,尽管地塞米松组在第3天至第4天的平均累积得分增加了约82%,但在高海拔地区,地塞米松组的平均累积得分在第2天均显著低于安慰剂组(p = 0.01, p = 0.02)。我们的结论是,地塞米松每12小时4mg,虽然最初有效,但不足以持续预防5334 m的AMS症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wilderness Taxonomic revision of Bracalba Dodd (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae s.l.), a parasitoid wasp genus endemic to Australia. Ambulatory sleep–wake recording in an acclimatized mountaineer over 8 days at high altitude Human tick bite records in a United States Air Force population, 1989–1992: implications for tick-borne disease risk Bison goring injuries: penetrating and blunt trauma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1