Nutritional and consumer acceptance evaluation of soymilk from specialty and conventional soybean cultivars

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Brazilian Journal of Food Technology Pub Date : 2023-04-07 DOI:10.1590/1981-6723.07522
I. Felberg, M. Carrão-Panizzi, R. Deliza, S. Freitas, E. B. Gonçalves, S. Pacheco, M. Santiago, R. Antoniassi
{"title":"Nutritional and consumer acceptance evaluation of soymilk from specialty and conventional soybean cultivars","authors":"I. Felberg, M. Carrão-Panizzi, R. Deliza, S. Freitas, E. B. Gonçalves, S. Pacheco, M. Santiago, R. Antoniassi","doi":"10.1590/1981-6723.07522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The soymilk is a ready-to-eat, nutritious and naturally cholesterol-free product. Several soybean specialty cultivars were developed in Brazil in order to increase the human consumption of soybean products. The aim of this work was to evaluate the nutritional composition and consumer acceptance of soymilk from three soybean cultivars with special features such as high-protein and isoflavone contents, mild flavor and lipoxygenase-free compared to three conventional ones. The soymilk was obtained after blanching with a bicarbonate solution, grinding, centrifugation and pasteurization. The physicochemical and nutritional evaluation data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test to check differences among means, and the consumer data through cluster analysis and internal preference mapping. The lipoxygenases were inactivated after thermal processing. There were significant differences among soybean cultivars and soymilks related to the protein, isoflavones, oil, and sugar contents and soymilk yield (p < 0.05). The BRS 133 and BRS 284 cultivars and soymilks presented the highest total isoflavone content (p < 0.05). Regarding the overall consumer acceptance, there were significant differences among cultivars (p < 0.05) with means ranging from 5.9 to 6.7 and the lower score was obtained by BRS 267. However, the cluster analysis identified three consumer segments according to preference similarity. The cultivars BRS 284 and BRS 267 reached the highest mean among the consumers of segment 1 (6.8 and 6.7 respectively). The consumers of segment 2 preferred the cultivar without lipoxygenases, BRS 213 (mean of 7.5) while segment 3 preferred the BRS 133 (mean of 7.4). The process of blanching of soybean with bicarbonate solution, grinding with boiling water and pasteurization mitigated the differences between conventional and specialty cultivars and the six cultivars evaluated were suitable for soymilk production.","PeriodicalId":9112,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Food Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Food Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.07522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The soymilk is a ready-to-eat, nutritious and naturally cholesterol-free product. Several soybean specialty cultivars were developed in Brazil in order to increase the human consumption of soybean products. The aim of this work was to evaluate the nutritional composition and consumer acceptance of soymilk from three soybean cultivars with special features such as high-protein and isoflavone contents, mild flavor and lipoxygenase-free compared to three conventional ones. The soymilk was obtained after blanching with a bicarbonate solution, grinding, centrifugation and pasteurization. The physicochemical and nutritional evaluation data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test to check differences among means, and the consumer data through cluster analysis and internal preference mapping. The lipoxygenases were inactivated after thermal processing. There were significant differences among soybean cultivars and soymilks related to the protein, isoflavones, oil, and sugar contents and soymilk yield (p < 0.05). The BRS 133 and BRS 284 cultivars and soymilks presented the highest total isoflavone content (p < 0.05). Regarding the overall consumer acceptance, there were significant differences among cultivars (p < 0.05) with means ranging from 5.9 to 6.7 and the lower score was obtained by BRS 267. However, the cluster analysis identified three consumer segments according to preference similarity. The cultivars BRS 284 and BRS 267 reached the highest mean among the consumers of segment 1 (6.8 and 6.7 respectively). The consumers of segment 2 preferred the cultivar without lipoxygenases, BRS 213 (mean of 7.5) while segment 3 preferred the BRS 133 (mean of 7.4). The process of blanching of soybean with bicarbonate solution, grinding with boiling water and pasteurization mitigated the differences between conventional and specialty cultivars and the six cultivars evaluated were suitable for soymilk production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特色和常规大豆品种豆浆的营养和消费者接受度评价
豆浆是一种即食、营养丰富、天然不含胆固醇的产品。为了增加人类对大豆产品的消费,巴西开发了几个大豆特色品种。本研究的目的是比较三种具有高蛋白和异黄酮含量、风味温和、无脂氧酶等特点的大豆品种的豆浆与三种传统品种的豆浆的营养成分和消费者接受度。豆浆经碳酸氢盐溶液焯水、研磨、离心、巴氏消毒后制成。理化和营养评价数据采用方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey’s检验检验均数差异,消费者数据采用聚类分析和内部偏好映射。热处理后脂加氧酶失活。大豆品种和豆浆之间在蛋白质、异黄酮、油脂和糖含量及豆浆产量方面存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。BRS 133和BRS 284品种和豆浆中总异黄酮含量最高(p < 0.05)。在总体消费者接受度方面,品种间差异显著(p < 0.05),平均值在5.9 ~ 6.7之间,BRS 267得分较低。然而,聚类分析根据偏好相似性确定了三个消费者群体。品种BRS 284和BRS 267在1段消费者中的平均得分最高,分别为6.8分和6.7分。区段2的消费者更喜欢不含脂氧合酶的品种BRS 213(平均7.5),而区段3的消费者更喜欢BRS 133(平均7.4)。采用碳酸氢盐溶液烫烫、沸水研磨、巴氏杀菌等工艺处理大豆,可减小常规品种与特色品种之间的差异,6个品种适合豆浆生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Food Technology
Brazilian Journal of Food Technology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Food Technology (BJFT) is an electronic rolling pass publication with free access, whose purpose is to publish unpublished articles based on original research results and technological information that significantly contribute to the dissemination of new knowledge related to production and evaluation of food in the areas of science, technology, food engineering and nutrition (non-clinical). Manuscripts of national or international scope are accepted, presenting new concepts or experimental approaches that are not only repositories of scientific data. The Journal publishes original articles, review articles, scientific notes, case reports, and short communication in Portuguese and English. The submission of a manuscript presupposes that the same paper is not under analysis for publication in any other divulging vehicle. Articles specifically contemplating analytical methodologies will be accepted as long as they are innovative or provide significant improvement to existing methods. It is at the discretion of the Editors, depending on the subject relevance, the acceptance of works with test results of industrialized products without the information necessary to manufacture them. Papers aimed essentially at commercial propaganda will not be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Plant based proteins as an egg alternative in cookies: using de-oiled sunflower meal and its protein isolate as an emulsifying agent Nutritional evaluation and palatability of pet biscuits for dogs Physicochemical changes during controlled laboratory fermentation of cocoa (CCN-51) with the inclusion of fruits and on-farm inoculation Nutraceuticals based on Portuguese grape pomaces as a potential additive in food products Valorization of lychee fruit peels waste for the sustainable production of value-added ingredient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1