Estudo comparativo de métodos de amostragem de comunidades de Costão

C. M. Sabino, R. Villaça
{"title":"Estudo comparativo de métodos de amostragem de comunidades de Costão","authors":"C. M. Sabino, R. Villaça","doi":"10.1590/S0034-71081999000300005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares three sampling methodologies of rocky shore communities: visual estimation, point intercept quadrats and destructive sampling. Visual estimation was performed in two sizes of sampling device and, point intercept quadrats was done with different numbers of marked dots. The sampling took place on the rocky shore of Forno beach, Buzios, RJ, in two different algae belts; one whose the landscape is characterized by Amphiroa sp., the other, Sargassum furcatum was the most conspicuous species. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Number of species, total percent cover, diversity and evenness indices were the variables used. The results shown that in general the methods compared were not statistically different one from the other in this community. There were significative differences between the methods when comparison was made between non-destructive and destructive sampling. However, smaller areas of sampling devices and fewer intercept points decreased the sampling power in respect of sampling species richness. All of the methods studied were considered similar in concern of total cover index and of diversity and evenness indices, with some exceptions. Present data are useful only for rocky communities with similar profiles. The choice of method must be made in regard of each situation.","PeriodicalId":76429,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de biologia","volume":"59 1","pages":"407-419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/S0034-71081999000300005","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de biologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71081999000300005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

This study compares three sampling methodologies of rocky shore communities: visual estimation, point intercept quadrats and destructive sampling. Visual estimation was performed in two sizes of sampling device and, point intercept quadrats was done with different numbers of marked dots. The sampling took place on the rocky shore of Forno beach, Buzios, RJ, in two different algae belts; one whose the landscape is characterized by Amphiroa sp., the other, Sargassum furcatum was the most conspicuous species. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Number of species, total percent cover, diversity and evenness indices were the variables used. The results shown that in general the methods compared were not statistically different one from the other in this community. There were significative differences between the methods when comparison was made between non-destructive and destructive sampling. However, smaller areas of sampling devices and fewer intercept points decreased the sampling power in respect of sampling species richness. All of the methods studied were considered similar in concern of total cover index and of diversity and evenness indices, with some exceptions. Present data are useful only for rocky communities with similar profiles. The choice of method must be made in regard of each situation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沿海社区抽样方法的比较研究
本研究比较了岩岸群落的三种抽样方法:目测法、点截法和破坏性抽样。用两种尺寸的采样装置进行视觉估计,用不同数量的标记点进行点截距样方。采样在RJ Buzios Forno海滩的岩石岸边进行,在两个不同的藻类带中;其中以文昌鱼(Amphiroa sp.)为特征,马尾藻(Sargassum furcatum)是最显著的物种。数据分析采用方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验。采用物种数、总盖度、多样性和均匀度指数作为变量。结果表明,在该群落中,所比较的方法总体上没有统计学差异。在非破坏性取样和破坏性取样的比较中,两种方法之间存在显著差异。采样装置的面积越小,截点越少,采样效率越低。所研究的所有方法在总覆盖指数、多样性和均匀度指数方面被认为是相似的,但有一些例外。目前的数据仅对具有类似概况的岩石群落有用。方法的选择必须考虑到每一种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scaling between cell cycle duration and wing growth is regulated by Fat-Dachsous signaling in Drosophila. Influence of the pineal gland on the physiology, morphometry and morphology of pancreatic islets in rats Hidrogeochemical comparative study of the Ja and Jacar-Guau River watersheds, So Paulo, Brazil Dissolved inorganic carbon and metabolism of an eutrophic lacustrine system: variations from a 36-hours study Biological observations on Tupiperla (Plecoptera: Gripopterygidae).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1