Enabling and coercive management control systems and organizational resilience

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Revista Contabilidade e Financas Pub Date : 2019-08-21 DOI:10.1590/1808-057X201908210
I. Beuren, V. Santos
{"title":"Enabling and coercive management control systems and organizational resilience","authors":"I. Beuren, V. Santos","doi":"10.1590/1808-057X201908210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the impacts of enabling and coercive management control systems (MCSs) on organizational resilience, in the cognitive, behavioral, and contextual dimensions. Research on resilience has sought to identify elements capable of improving organizational resilience capacity, and enabling and coercive MCSs may shed new light on this discussion. Understanding the role of MCSs in the creation and use of resilience capacities can help explain why some organizations manage to outperform others in situations of adverse and turbulent events.The literature has focused on enabling MCSs and adopts the premise that, in general, the use of coercive controls is negatively perceived. However, the results of the research show that enabling and coercive MCSs coexist in companies, and that coercive controls do not have a negative influence on resilience, even showing a positive association with the contextual dimension. A survey was conducted in companies that bought and/or were acquired by others, according to PwC Brazil’s Mergers and Acquisitions report, and the sample consists of 144 managers from different organizational areas of these companies who answered the questionnaire sent via Survey Monkey. The structural equation modeling (SEM) technique was applied to test the hypotheses. The study presents evidence that MCSs constitute antecedents of resilience capacity in organizations. This suggests that the design and use of MCSs may favor the development of capacities to deal with turbulences and unexpected events in advance.","PeriodicalId":37984,"journal":{"name":"Revista Contabilidade e Financas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Contabilidade e Financas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057X201908210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

This study examines the impacts of enabling and coercive management control systems (MCSs) on organizational resilience, in the cognitive, behavioral, and contextual dimensions. Research on resilience has sought to identify elements capable of improving organizational resilience capacity, and enabling and coercive MCSs may shed new light on this discussion. Understanding the role of MCSs in the creation and use of resilience capacities can help explain why some organizations manage to outperform others in situations of adverse and turbulent events.The literature has focused on enabling MCSs and adopts the premise that, in general, the use of coercive controls is negatively perceived. However, the results of the research show that enabling and coercive MCSs coexist in companies, and that coercive controls do not have a negative influence on resilience, even showing a positive association with the contextual dimension. A survey was conducted in companies that bought and/or were acquired by others, according to PwC Brazil’s Mergers and Acquisitions report, and the sample consists of 144 managers from different organizational areas of these companies who answered the questionnaire sent via Survey Monkey. The structural equation modeling (SEM) technique was applied to test the hypotheses. The study presents evidence that MCSs constitute antecedents of resilience capacity in organizations. This suggests that the design and use of MCSs may favor the development of capacities to deal with turbulences and unexpected events in advance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
授权和强制管理控制系统和组织弹性
本研究从认知、行为和情境三个维度考察了授权和强制管理控制系统(mcs)对组织弹性的影响。对弹性的研究试图确定能够提高组织弹性能力的要素,而使能性和强制性MCSs可能会为这一讨论提供新的线索。理解MCSs在创建和使用弹性能力方面的作用可以帮助解释为什么一些组织在不利和动荡事件的情况下能够超越其他组织。文献集中在使mcs和采用的前提下,一般来说,使用强制控制是消极的看法。然而,研究结果表明,在公司中,使能型和强制性管理能力并存,强制性控制对弹性没有负面影响,甚至与情境维度呈正相关。根据普华永道巴西公司的并购报告,在收购和/或被他人收购的公司中进行了一项调查,样本包括来自这些公司不同组织领域的144名经理,他们回答了通过survey Monkey发送的问卷。采用结构方程建模(SEM)技术对假设进行验证。本研究提供证据,证明MCSs构成组织弹性能力的前因。这表明MCSs的设计和使用可能有利于事先处理湍流和突发事件的能力的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Contabilidade e Financas
Revista Contabilidade e Financas Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista Contabilidade & Finanças (RC&F) publishes inedited theoretical development papers and theoretical-empirical studies in Accounting, Controllership, Actuarial Sciences and Finance. The journal accepts research papers in different paradigms and using various research methods, provided that they are consistent and relevant for the development of these areas. Besides research papers, its main focus, traditional papers and manuscripts in other formats that can contribute to communicate new knowledge to the community are also published.
期刊最新文献
The career sustainability of accountants: a profession in transition The effect on the BTD of IFRS adoption and the end of the Transitional Tax Regime (RTT) in Brazil Control systems and interorganizational identification in technology parks cooperation Effects of informal controls and psychological empowerment on job satisfaction Investment fund selection techniques from the perspective of Brazilian pension funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1