Local Responses to the Structural Changes of National Development Policyin Hungarian Rural Regions

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Eastern European Countryside Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1515/eec-2016-0004
Éva Perger
{"title":"Local Responses to the Structural Changes of National Development Policyin Hungarian Rural Regions","authors":"Éva Perger","doi":"10.1515/eec-2016-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper is based on the preliminary results of an ongoing research programme supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund. The objective of the research is to find out how local actors react to the changing development policy context, how it shapes the local practices of local agents, and how such interactions influence local society and the development of rural micro-regions. The main pillars of the study are subject-oriented case-studies in two rural microregions. The pilot regions are very similar in terms of geographical location, natural resources, population, territory, settlement structure and economicsocial status, yet they have followed a very different development track, mainly due to the different local reactions to the changing state development policy. Our research demonstrates that the key factor of local success is multi-level (settlement, micro-region) cooperation between various (public, private and civil) local stakeholders. The crucial demand for a main facilitator of local cooperation could be satisfied by the local government, provided that it is able to adapt to the frequent changes leading to the emergence of new social networks. No evidence is found to indicate the existence of a ‘project class’ within the local rural societies assuming an intermediary role between decision makers and beneficiaries. The traditional structures of power (based on party- and economic hierarchy) seem to survive. Although project-based implementation has become predominant in development policy, the main arena of the ‘struggle’ to obtain development resources is still the political one.","PeriodicalId":42882,"journal":{"name":"Eastern European Countryside","volume":"22 1","pages":"69 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern European Countryside","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eec-2016-0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The paper is based on the preliminary results of an ongoing research programme supported by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund. The objective of the research is to find out how local actors react to the changing development policy context, how it shapes the local practices of local agents, and how such interactions influence local society and the development of rural micro-regions. The main pillars of the study are subject-oriented case-studies in two rural microregions. The pilot regions are very similar in terms of geographical location, natural resources, population, territory, settlement structure and economicsocial status, yet they have followed a very different development track, mainly due to the different local reactions to the changing state development policy. Our research demonstrates that the key factor of local success is multi-level (settlement, micro-region) cooperation between various (public, private and civil) local stakeholders. The crucial demand for a main facilitator of local cooperation could be satisfied by the local government, provided that it is able to adapt to the frequent changes leading to the emergence of new social networks. No evidence is found to indicate the existence of a ‘project class’ within the local rural societies assuming an intermediary role between decision makers and beneficiaries. The traditional structures of power (based on party- and economic hierarchy) seem to survive. Although project-based implementation has become predominant in development policy, the main arena of the ‘struggle’ to obtain development resources is still the political one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匈牙利农村地区对国家发展政策结构变化的地方反应
这篇论文是基于匈牙利科学研究基金支持的一个正在进行的研究项目的初步结果。研究的目的是找出地方行动者如何对不断变化的发展政策环境作出反应,它如何影响地方行动者的地方做法,以及这种相互作用如何影响地方社会和农村微区域的发展。这项研究的主要支柱是在两个农村微区进行以主题为导向的个案研究。这些试验区在地理位置、自然资源、人口、地域、聚落结构、经济社会地位等方面都非常相似,但它们却走了一条截然不同的发展轨道,这主要是由于地方对国家发展政策变化的反应不同。我们的研究表明,地方成功的关键因素是各种(公共、私人和民间)地方利益相关者之间的多层次(聚落、微区域)合作。如果地方政府能够适应频繁的变化导致新的社会网络的出现,那么地方政府就可以满足对地方合作主要促进者的关键需求。没有证据表明在当地农村社会中存在一个“项目阶层”,在决策者和受益者之间扮演中介角色。传统的权力结构(基于政党和经济等级)似乎还在继续。尽管以项目为基础的实施在发展政策中占主导地位,但争取发展资源的“斗争”的主要领域仍然是政治领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The importance of local community attitudes for sustainable tourism in protected areas: The case of Tikvara Nature Park, Serbia The rural linguistic landscape of Banat Gentrified countryside and non-gentrified countryside: Spatial dimension of the rural gentrification process The impact of the age structure of active population on agricultural activity rate: The case study of the Timok Krajina region Tourism-based development opportunities for rural areas. Example of an underdeveloped region (Siklós district)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1