Modelling the number of client firms needed to support a new Science Park and the spacing between new parks and existing parks with similar themes

R. Mellor, A. Kussainov, Charles Mondal
{"title":"Modelling the number of client firms needed to support a new Science Park and the spacing between new parks and existing parks with similar themes","authors":"R. Mellor, A. Kussainov, Charles Mondal","doi":"10.1504/ijkbd.2021.10045921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": UK Science & Technology Parks (STPs) specialised in pharmaceutical areas were compared with universities scoring highly in pharmaceutical research and with firms returning the corresponding Standard Industry Classification (SIC) codes at Companies House. There was no correlation between the average distance between STPs and highly scoring universities and no evidence that high-ranking universities can attract specialised firms. The ability of STPs to attract specialised firms was investigated and on-campus STPs (within 2 km of the university) were not significantly more successful or less successful than other STPs. To support a specialised STP, an average of 19.15 firms with a similar speciality was found within a 7.89 km radius. In the UK, STPs that are members of the Science Park Association (UKSPA) exist on average 12 km apart but STPs specialised in pharmaceuticals were much further apart, average 32.65 km and this difference is highly significant.","PeriodicalId":44642,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkbd.2021.10045921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: UK Science & Technology Parks (STPs) specialised in pharmaceutical areas were compared with universities scoring highly in pharmaceutical research and with firms returning the corresponding Standard Industry Classification (SIC) codes at Companies House. There was no correlation between the average distance between STPs and highly scoring universities and no evidence that high-ranking universities can attract specialised firms. The ability of STPs to attract specialised firms was investigated and on-campus STPs (within 2 km of the university) were not significantly more successful or less successful than other STPs. To support a specialised STP, an average of 19.15 firms with a similar speciality was found within a 7.89 km radius. In the UK, STPs that are members of the Science Park Association (UKSPA) exist on average 12 km apart but STPs specialised in pharmaceuticals were much further apart, average 32.65 km and this difference is highly significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟支持新科学园所需的客户公司数量,以及新园区与现有主题相似的园区之间的间距
英国专门从事制药领域的科技园区(STPs)与在制药研究方面得分很高的大学以及在公司注册处返回相应的标准行业分类(SIC)代码的公司进行了比较。stp与得分高的大学之间的平均距离没有相关性,也没有证据表明排名高的大学可以吸引专业公司。研究人员调查了stp吸引专业公司的能力,发现校园内的stp(距离大学2公里以内)并不明显比其他stp更成功或更不成功。为了支持专业化的STP,在7.89公里的半径内平均发现了19.15家具有类似专业的公司。在英国,作为科学园区协会(UKSPA)成员的科技园区平均相距12公里,但专门从事制药的科技园区的距离要远得多,平均为32.65公里,这种差异非常显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with inlay glenoid component: A systematic review. A paradigm for the development of knowledge-intensive enterprises: The case of agricultural knowledge-intensive enterprises in western Iran The Use of Open Design in the Fab Lab Ecosystems: Lessons Learnt for Knowledge Management The impact of technology optimization incorporating machine learning algorithms on the financial sustainability of new energy companies Research on the analysis of regional economic sustainable development trend based on decision tree classification prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1