Family Farming in Poland and in the World – Thematic Edition of Wieś i Rolnictwo [Countryside and Agriculture] Quarterly Magazine

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Eastern European Countryside Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1515/eec-2016-0014
S. Michalska
{"title":"Family Farming in Poland and in the World – Thematic Edition of Wieś i Rolnictwo [Countryside and Agriculture] Quarterly Magazine","authors":"S. Michalska","doi":"10.1515/eec-2016-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For many years now, family farming has been a subject of interest for scientists, although attempts to research and describe this phenomenon have been met with numerous methodological, definitional and practical problems. A recurring thread of these publications to which other scientists are referring is the manner of defining the “family farm” term. Indeed, an accurate definition would be useful and allow precise research of this group of farms. Over the years, numerous attempts have been made to specify who we are talking about while using the following terms: “small farms”, “family farms”, “economically weak farms”. Problems concerning the types of indicators (farm area, its income, form of property, labour) which should be taken into account while constructing a definition of the family farm are still being discussed. In Poland, many authors have written about problems concerning the establishment of a definition for family farm (see. Sikorska 2003; Józwiak 2007; Zegar 2007; Halamska 2005, 2011; Dzun 2014 and others), although it seems that this question is still open both for us and in other parts of the world. Other topics also appear in the discussion – in a context of research concentrated on small family farms and changes occurring in the countryside and their influence on agriculture and farmers (see among others Wilkin","PeriodicalId":42882,"journal":{"name":"Eastern European Countryside","volume":"25 1","pages":"271 - 279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern European Countryside","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eec-2016-0014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

For many years now, family farming has been a subject of interest for scientists, although attempts to research and describe this phenomenon have been met with numerous methodological, definitional and practical problems. A recurring thread of these publications to which other scientists are referring is the manner of defining the “family farm” term. Indeed, an accurate definition would be useful and allow precise research of this group of farms. Over the years, numerous attempts have been made to specify who we are talking about while using the following terms: “small farms”, “family farms”, “economically weak farms”. Problems concerning the types of indicators (farm area, its income, form of property, labour) which should be taken into account while constructing a definition of the family farm are still being discussed. In Poland, many authors have written about problems concerning the establishment of a definition for family farm (see. Sikorska 2003; Józwiak 2007; Zegar 2007; Halamska 2005, 2011; Dzun 2014 and others), although it seems that this question is still open both for us and in other parts of the world. Other topics also appear in the discussion – in a context of research concentrated on small family farms and changes occurring in the countryside and their influence on agriculture and farmers (see among others Wilkin
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰和世界的家庭农业——《农村与农业》季刊专题版
多年来,家庭农业一直是科学家们感兴趣的课题,尽管试图研究和描述这一现象遇到了许多方法论、定义和实际问题。其他科学家引用的这些出版物中一个反复出现的线索是对“家庭农场”一词的定义方式。事实上,一个准确的定义将是有用的,并允许对这组农场进行精确的研究。多年来,人们多次尝试用“小农场”、“家庭农场”、“经济薄弱的农场”等术语来明确我们谈论的是谁。目前仍在讨论在确定家庭农场的定义时应考虑到的指标类型(农场面积、收入、财产形式、劳动力)的问题。在波兰,许多作者写了关于建立家庭农场定义的问题(见。Sikorska 2003;Jozwiak 2007;Zegar 2007;Halamska 2005,2011;Dzun 2014和其他人),尽管这个问题似乎仍然对我们和世界其他地区开放。其他主题也出现在讨论中——在集中研究小型家庭农场和农村发生的变化及其对农业和农民的影响的背景下(见威尔金等人)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The importance of local community attitudes for sustainable tourism in protected areas: The case of Tikvara Nature Park, Serbia The rural linguistic landscape of Banat Gentrified countryside and non-gentrified countryside: Spatial dimension of the rural gentrification process The impact of the age structure of active population on agricultural activity rate: The case study of the Timok Krajina region Tourism-based development opportunities for rural areas. Example of an underdeveloped region (Siklós district)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1