From State-Socialist Ambitions of Romanian Rural Indutrialisation to Post-Socialist Rural Deindutrialisation: Two Case Studies From Romania

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Eastern European Countryside Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1515/eec-2016-0009
I. Jucu
{"title":"From State-Socialist Ambitions of Romanian Rural Indutrialisation to Post-Socialist Rural Deindutrialisation: Two Case Studies From Romania","authors":"I. Jucu","doi":"10.1515/eec-2016-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The post-socialist changes in Romania’s communities profoundly changed the rural settlements with similar, contrasting and tensioned trends in the local rural development. The purpose of this study is to focus on the post-socialist rural dereliction. The paper unveils the post-socialist rural transformation in Romania, from the state-socialist interventions in rural industrialisation, to the post-socialist rural identity formation, using both quantitative and qualitative methods. During this process, two sampled case studies were thoroughly analysed, namely the Tomeşti and Margina communes – two rural settlements intensely industrialised under the former state-socialist political regime and with multiple consequences during the post-90s period in their local development. According to recent theories on economic changes reflected in local rural spatial development, the idea of rural dereliction remains peripheral and, at the same time, a hot-spot issue in the contemporary research on rural restructuring. In addition, recent theories on social and economic changes provide useful frameworks in studying the production of rural ruins. With post-socialist deindustrialisation, and under new post-90 capitalist rules in local rural development, rural communities faced multiple problems in creating their own post-socialist identity. Accordingly, this study highlights the local problems of rural deindustrialisation in the inner rural pattern of the investigated sites. While some rural communities embrace slow rural spatial regeneration trends, others remain ruined, marginalised and declined. The findings of the study confirm the presence of derelict abandoned places, thus highlighting the need for further proper interventions in local rural development, and for further fertile scientific dialogues to promote suitable strategies in Romanian rural regeneration on the local scale.","PeriodicalId":42882,"journal":{"name":"Eastern European Countryside","volume":"22 1","pages":"165 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/eec-2016-0009","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern European Countryside","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eec-2016-0009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract The post-socialist changes in Romania’s communities profoundly changed the rural settlements with similar, contrasting and tensioned trends in the local rural development. The purpose of this study is to focus on the post-socialist rural dereliction. The paper unveils the post-socialist rural transformation in Romania, from the state-socialist interventions in rural industrialisation, to the post-socialist rural identity formation, using both quantitative and qualitative methods. During this process, two sampled case studies were thoroughly analysed, namely the Tomeşti and Margina communes – two rural settlements intensely industrialised under the former state-socialist political regime and with multiple consequences during the post-90s period in their local development. According to recent theories on economic changes reflected in local rural spatial development, the idea of rural dereliction remains peripheral and, at the same time, a hot-spot issue in the contemporary research on rural restructuring. In addition, recent theories on social and economic changes provide useful frameworks in studying the production of rural ruins. With post-socialist deindustrialisation, and under new post-90 capitalist rules in local rural development, rural communities faced multiple problems in creating their own post-socialist identity. Accordingly, this study highlights the local problems of rural deindustrialisation in the inner rural pattern of the investigated sites. While some rural communities embrace slow rural spatial regeneration trends, others remain ruined, marginalised and declined. The findings of the study confirm the presence of derelict abandoned places, thus highlighting the need for further proper interventions in local rural development, and for further fertile scientific dialogues to promote suitable strategies in Romanian rural regeneration on the local scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从罗马尼亚乡村工业化的国家社会主义野心到后社会主义乡村去工业化:罗马尼亚的两个案例研究
罗马尼亚社区的后社会主义变革深刻地改变了乡土聚落,在乡土发展中呈现出相似、对比、紧张的趋势。本研究的目的是关注后社会主义农村遗弃问题。本文运用定量和定性的方法,揭示了罗马尼亚后社会主义农村转型,从国家社会主义对农村工业化的干预,到后社会主义农村身份的形成。在此过程中,对两个抽样案例研究进行了深入分析,即tometi和Margina公社,这两个农村住区在前国家社会主义政治体制下高度工业化,并在90年代后的地方发展中产生了多种后果。从目前关于乡土空间发展所反映的经济变化的理论来看,乡土弃置的概念仍然是一个边缘问题,同时也是当代乡土重构研究的热点问题。此外,最近关于社会和经济变化的理论为研究农村遗址的生产提供了有用的框架。随着后社会主义的去工业化,以及90后地方农村发展的资本主义新规则,农村社区在塑造自己的后社会主义身份方面面临着多重问题。因此,本研究强调了被调查地点内乡村模式中乡村去工业化的地方性问题。虽然一些乡村社区接受了缓慢的乡村空间更新趋势,但其他社区仍然被破坏、边缘化和衰落。该研究的结果证实了被遗弃的地方的存在,从而强调了对当地农村发展进行进一步适当干预的必要性,以及进一步开展丰富的科学对话,以促进罗马尼亚地方范围内农村复兴的适当战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The importance of local community attitudes for sustainable tourism in protected areas: The case of Tikvara Nature Park, Serbia The rural linguistic landscape of Banat Gentrified countryside and non-gentrified countryside: Spatial dimension of the rural gentrification process The impact of the age structure of active population on agricultural activity rate: The case study of the Timok Krajina region Tourism-based development opportunities for rural areas. Example of an underdeveloped region (Siklós district)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1