Malaysian ‘knowledge society’: refining and verifying the definition

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Knowledge and Learning Pub Date : 2010-08-23 DOI:10.1504/IJKL.2010.03475
Norsiah Abdul Hamid, H. Zaman
{"title":"Malaysian ‘knowledge society’: refining and verifying the definition","authors":"Norsiah Abdul Hamid, H. Zaman","doi":"10.1504/IJKL.2010.03475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper outlines the findings of the research where the central idea is to define the term knowledge society (KS) in Malaysian context. The research focuses on three important dimensions, namely knowledge, ICT and human capital. This study adopts a modified Delphi technique to seek the important dimensions that can contribute to the development of Malaysian's KS. The Delphi technique involved ten experts in a five-round iterative and controlled feedback procedure to obtain consensus on the important dimensions and to verify the proposed definition of KS. The finding shows that all three dimensions proposed initially scored high and moderate consensus. Round one (R1) proposed an initial definition of KS and required comments and inputs from the panel. These inputs were then used to develop items for an R2 questionnaire. In R2, 56 out of 73 items scored high consensus, and in R3, 63 out of 90 items scored high. R4 was conducted to re-rate the new items, in which eight out of 17 items scored high. Other items scored moderate consensus and no item scored low or no consensus in all rounds. The final round (R5) was employed to verify the final definition of KS. The findings and discovery of this study are significant to the definition of KS and the development of a framework in the Malaysian context.","PeriodicalId":43176,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Knowledge and Learning","volume":"6 1","pages":"142-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Knowledge and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2010.03475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper outlines the findings of the research where the central idea is to define the term knowledge society (KS) in Malaysian context. The research focuses on three important dimensions, namely knowledge, ICT and human capital. This study adopts a modified Delphi technique to seek the important dimensions that can contribute to the development of Malaysian's KS. The Delphi technique involved ten experts in a five-round iterative and controlled feedback procedure to obtain consensus on the important dimensions and to verify the proposed definition of KS. The finding shows that all three dimensions proposed initially scored high and moderate consensus. Round one (R1) proposed an initial definition of KS and required comments and inputs from the panel. These inputs were then used to develop items for an R2 questionnaire. In R2, 56 out of 73 items scored high consensus, and in R3, 63 out of 90 items scored high. R4 was conducted to re-rate the new items, in which eight out of 17 items scored high. Other items scored moderate consensus and no item scored low or no consensus in all rounds. The final round (R5) was employed to verify the final definition of KS. The findings and discovery of this study are significant to the definition of KS and the development of a framework in the Malaysian context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚的“知识社会”:定义的提炼与验证
本文概述了研究的发现,其中的中心思想是定义术语知识社会(KS)在马来西亚的背景下。研究重点关注三个重要维度,即知识、信息通信技术和人力资本。本研究采用一种改良的德尔菲法来寻找能够促进马来西亚KS发展的重要维度。德尔菲技术涉及10位专家,在五轮迭代和控制反馈过程中获得对重要维度的共识,并验证提出的KS定义。结果表明,最初提出的三个维度都获得了高和中等的共识。第一轮(R1)提出了KS的初步定义,并要求专家组提供意见和投入。然后使用这些输入来开发R2问卷的项目。在R2中,73个项目中有56个获得了高共识,在R3中,90个项目中有63个获得了高共识。R4对新项目进行了重新评价,17个项目中有8个得分很高。在所有的回合中,其他项目得分中等,没有项目得分低或没有一致。最后一轮(R5)用来验证KS的最终定义。本研究的发现和发现对马来西亚背景下KS的定义和框架的发展具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Knowledge and Learning
International Journal of Knowledge and Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Consequences of online class during COVID-19 with women schoolteachers’ work-life balance Loan delinquency analysis using predictive model Knowledge-oriented leadership and innovative performance: role of creative self-efficacy and organisational climate in software industry of Pakistan ICTs for reflective pedagogy: voices from teacher education Comparing yinyang and fission-fusion algorithms for accelerating the k-means
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1