[Transdermal nitroglycerin versus oral nifedipine administration for tocolysis: a randomized clinical trial].

IF 1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia Pub Date : 2009-11-01 DOI:10.1590/S0100-72032009001100005
M. Amorim, L. Lippo, A. Costa, I. Coutinho, A. Souza
{"title":"[Transdermal nitroglycerin versus oral nifedipine administration for tocolysis: a randomized clinical trial].","authors":"M. Amorim, L. Lippo, A. Costa, I. Coutinho, A. Souza","doi":"10.1590/S0100-72032009001100005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nto compare the effectiveness of transdermal nitroglycerin with oral nifedipine in the inhibition of preterm delivery.\n\n\nMETHODS\na clinical essay has been performed with 50 women in preterm delivery, randomly divided into two groups, 24 receiving oral nifedipine (20 mg), and 26, transdermal nitroglycerin (10 mg patch). Patients with a single gestation, between the 24th and the 34th weeks and diagnosis of preterm delivery were selected. Women with fetal malformation and clinical or obstetric diseases were excluded. The variables analyzed were: effective tocolysis, time needed for tocolysis, recurrence frequency, progression to preterm delivery, and side effects.\n\n\nRESULTS\ntocolysis efficacy in the first 12 hours was similar between the groups (nitroglycerin: 84.6% versus nifedipine: 87.5%; p=0.50). The time average time needed for tocolysis was also similar (6.6 versus 5.8 hours; p=0.30). There was no difference between the groups, concerning the recurrence of preterm delivery (26.9 versus 16.7%; p=0.30), and neither in the rate of preterm delivery within 48 hours (15.4 versus 12.5%; p=0.50). Nevertheless, the cephalea rate was significantly higher in the Nitroglycerin Group (30.8 versus 8.3%; p=0.04).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\ntransdermal nitroglycerin has presented similar effectiveness to oral nifedipine to inhibit preterm delivery in the first 48 hours, however with higher cephalea frequency.","PeriodicalId":47257,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032009001100005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

PURPOSE to compare the effectiveness of transdermal nitroglycerin with oral nifedipine in the inhibition of preterm delivery. METHODS a clinical essay has been performed with 50 women in preterm delivery, randomly divided into two groups, 24 receiving oral nifedipine (20 mg), and 26, transdermal nitroglycerin (10 mg patch). Patients with a single gestation, between the 24th and the 34th weeks and diagnosis of preterm delivery were selected. Women with fetal malformation and clinical or obstetric diseases were excluded. The variables analyzed were: effective tocolysis, time needed for tocolysis, recurrence frequency, progression to preterm delivery, and side effects. RESULTS tocolysis efficacy in the first 12 hours was similar between the groups (nitroglycerin: 84.6% versus nifedipine: 87.5%; p=0.50). The time average time needed for tocolysis was also similar (6.6 versus 5.8 hours; p=0.30). There was no difference between the groups, concerning the recurrence of preterm delivery (26.9 versus 16.7%; p=0.30), and neither in the rate of preterm delivery within 48 hours (15.4 versus 12.5%; p=0.50). Nevertheless, the cephalea rate was significantly higher in the Nitroglycerin Group (30.8 versus 8.3%; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS transdermal nitroglycerin has presented similar effectiveness to oral nifedipine to inhibit preterm delivery in the first 48 hours, however with higher cephalea frequency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[经皮硝酸甘油与口服硝苯地平治疗妊娠溶解:一项随机临床试验]。
目的比较经皮硝酸甘油与口服硝苯地平对早产的抑制作用。方法对50例早产妇女进行临床研究,随机分为两组,24例口服硝苯地平(20mg), 26例经皮硝酸甘油(10mg)贴剂。选择单胎、24 ~ 34周及诊断为早产的患者。排除有胎儿畸形和临床或产科疾病的妇女。分析的变量包括:有效的胎解、胎解所需的时间、复发频率、进展到早产以及副作用。结果两组患者前12小时的溶栓率相似(硝酸甘油:84.6% vs硝苯地平:87.5%;p = 0.50)。产妇镇静所需的平均时间也相似(6.6小时对5.8小时;p = 0.30)。在早产复发率方面,两组间无差异(26.9% vs 16.7%;P =0.30), 48小时内早产率均无差异(15.4% vs 12.5%;p = 0.50)。然而,硝酸甘油组的头肿率明显更高(30.8% vs 8.3%;p = 0.04)。结论硝丙透皮与口服硝苯地平对48 h内早产的抑制效果相似,但头痫发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, ISSN 1806-9339) is a monthly publication of scientific divulgation of the Federação das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO). It is directed to obstetricians, gynecologists and professionals of related areas, with the purpose of publishing research results on relevant topics in the field of Gynecology, Obstetrics and related areas. It is open to national and international contributions and the journal receives submissions only in English.
期刊最新文献
Função sexual de mulheres com infertilidade [Determinants of maternal near miss in an obstetric intensive care unit]. [Limitations and controversies in determining the predictive value of oocyte and embryo morphology criteria]. Efeito do exercício físico sobre os parâmetros hemodinâmicos Expressão proteica do gene HOXA10 e dos receptores de estrogênio e progesterona no epitélio, estroma e tecido muscular liso perilesional de endometriose do reto-sigmoide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1