Polysemie und morphosyntaktische Variation

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS BEITRAGE ZUR GESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE UND LITERATUR Pub Date : 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1515/bgsl-2021-0042
Melitta Gillmann, A. Werth
{"title":"Polysemie und morphosyntaktische Variation","authors":"Melitta Gillmann, A. Werth","doi":"10.1515/bgsl-2021-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper studies perfect auxiliary selection of the verb stehen ›to stand‹ in 17th and 18th century corpora as well as in dialect and newspaper corpora of contemporary German. Being restricted to the auxiliary haben ›have‹ in central and northern German varieties, stative verbs denoting the maintenance of a physical body’s position such as stehen are well known to allow both haben ›have‹ and sein ›be‹ in southern German varieties. Our study reveals that this variability was even more widespread in historical stages of German. We witness a preponderance of sein in the 17th century. Over the course of the 18th century, haben usages increased at the expense of sein. Strikingly, only central-eastern varieties tended to prefer haben over all periods under scrutiny. In addition to region, the polysemy of the verb stehen contributed to the choice of the auxiliary in that non-literal or idiomatic usages tended to prefer haben.","PeriodicalId":42934,"journal":{"name":"BEITRAGE ZUR GESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE UND LITERATUR","volume":"143 1","pages":"513 - 562"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BEITRAGE ZUR GESCHICHTE DER DEUTSCHEN SPRACHE UND LITERATUR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl-2021-0042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper studies perfect auxiliary selection of the verb stehen ›to stand‹ in 17th and 18th century corpora as well as in dialect and newspaper corpora of contemporary German. Being restricted to the auxiliary haben ›have‹ in central and northern German varieties, stative verbs denoting the maintenance of a physical body’s position such as stehen are well known to allow both haben ›have‹ and sein ›be‹ in southern German varieties. Our study reveals that this variability was even more widespread in historical stages of German. We witness a preponderance of sein in the 17th century. Over the course of the 18th century, haben usages increased at the expense of sein. Strikingly, only central-eastern varieties tended to prefer haben over all periods under scrutiny. In addition to region, the polysemy of the verb stehen contributed to the choice of the auxiliary in that non-literal or idiomatic usages tended to prefer haben.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多态和变形
摘要本文研究了17、18世纪德语语料库以及现代德语方言语料库和报纸语料库中动词stehen to stand的完善助动词选择。由于在中部和北部德语变体中仅限于助动词haben have,表示保持身体位置的静态动词,如stehen,众所周知,在南部德语变体中允许haben have和sein be。我们的研究表明,这种差异在德语的历史阶段更为普遍。我们在17世纪看到了盛的优势。在18世纪的过程中,haben的用法以sein为代价而增加。引人注目的是,只有中东部的品种在所有研究时期都倾向于haben。除了区域之外,动词stehen的多义性也促成了助词的选择,因为非字面或习惯用法倾向于选择haben。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB) was founded by Hermann Paul and Wilhelm Braune in 1874. It publishes essays on diachronic linguistics and the history of German Literature from the beginnings to about 1600, as well as reviews of monographs and collected works in these fields. Whilst focusing on the German language and literature, it also contains contributions on Germanic languages (especially old Nordic) as well as middle Latin philology and interdisciplinary works.
期刊最新文献
Early epigraphic evidence for Germanic weak class-III verbs Elke Brüggen (Hg.): Macht und Herrschaft als transkulturelle Phänomene. Texte – Bilder – Artefakte, Göttingen: V & R unipress 2021, 413 S., 33 Abb. (Macht und Herrschaft 13) Literatur und Ökonomie: ein mediävistischer Kommentar zu zwei Handbüchern Megumi Sato: Sprachvariation und Sprachwandel im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert. Untersuchungen zur Kasusrektion der Präpositionen wegen, statt, während und trotz, Heidelberg: Winter 2022, 382 S. (Germanistische Bibliothek 77) Susanne Köbele u. Claudio Notz (Hgg.): Die Versuchung der schönen Form. Spannungen in ›Erbauungs‹-Konzepten des Mittelalters, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2019, 325 S., 8 Abb. (Historische Semantik 30)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1