Sealing the Demons, Once and For All: The Ring of Solomon, the Cross of Christ, and the Power of Biblical Kingship

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte Pub Date : 2015-01-13 DOI:10.1515/arege-2014-0008
Ra'anan S. Boustan, Michael Beshay
{"title":"Sealing the Demons, Once and For All: The Ring of Solomon, the Cross of Christ, and the Power of Biblical Kingship","authors":"Ra'anan S. Boustan, Michael Beshay","doi":"10.1515/arege-2014-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper traces the historical development of the tradition that King Solomon made use of a signet-ring to marshal the demons as a labor-force for the construction of the Jerusalem Temple and analyzes the shifting ritual uses to which this tradition was put.We argue that this tradition, which is most fully articulated in the Testament of Solomon, is a Christian innovation of the third and fourth centuries rather than a venerable Jewish tradition with roots in the Second Temple period. This branch of the Solomon tradition first emerged within the context of internal Christian debates of the third century concerning proper baptismal practice, where the power of baptism to provide protection from the demons was linked to debates concerning the efficacy of Solomon’s act of sealing the demons in the temple. In the post-Constantinian period, the ring of Solomon was venerated by pilgrims to Jerusalem as a “relic” of Israelite kingship alongside the True Cross. Like certain strands of the Testament of Solomon literature, the pilgrimage practices performed at this potent site figure Christ’s victory on the cross as the fulfillment-once and for all-of Solomon’s only provisional mastery over the demons. In this context, Solomon’s ring gave concrete expression to Christian claims on the Old Testament past, while also mediating between imperial and ecclesiastical power.","PeriodicalId":29740,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","volume":"16 1","pages":"130 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/arege-2014-0008","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arege-2014-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper traces the historical development of the tradition that King Solomon made use of a signet-ring to marshal the demons as a labor-force for the construction of the Jerusalem Temple and analyzes the shifting ritual uses to which this tradition was put.We argue that this tradition, which is most fully articulated in the Testament of Solomon, is a Christian innovation of the third and fourth centuries rather than a venerable Jewish tradition with roots in the Second Temple period. This branch of the Solomon tradition first emerged within the context of internal Christian debates of the third century concerning proper baptismal practice, where the power of baptism to provide protection from the demons was linked to debates concerning the efficacy of Solomon’s act of sealing the demons in the temple. In the post-Constantinian period, the ring of Solomon was venerated by pilgrims to Jerusalem as a “relic” of Israelite kingship alongside the True Cross. Like certain strands of the Testament of Solomon literature, the pilgrimage practices performed at this potent site figure Christ’s victory on the cross as the fulfillment-once and for all-of Solomon’s only provisional mastery over the demons. In this context, Solomon’s ring gave concrete expression to Christian claims on the Old Testament past, while also mediating between imperial and ecclesiastical power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
封印恶魔,一劳永逸:所罗门的戒指,基督的十字架,和圣经王权的力量
摘要:本文追溯了所罗门王在耶路撒冷圣殿的建造中使用图章戒指来召集恶魔作为劳动力的传统的历史发展,并分析了这一传统的仪式用途的变化。我们认为,这一传统在《所罗门的遗嘱》中得到了最充分的阐述,它是第三和第四世纪基督教的创新,而不是源于第二圣殿时期的可敬的犹太传统。所罗门传统的这一分支最初出现在三世纪基督教内部关于适当洗礼实践的争论中,其中洗礼提供保护免受恶魔侵害的力量与所罗门将恶魔封印在寺庙中的行为的有效性的争论有关。在后君士坦丁时期,所罗门的戒指被前往耶路撒冷的朝圣者视为以色列王权的“遗物”,与真十字架并列。就像《所罗门的遗嘱》文学的某些部分一样,在这个强大的地方进行的朝圣活动将基督在十字架上的胜利视为所罗门对恶魔的唯一暂时控制的一次彻底的实现。在这种背景下,所罗门的戒指具体表达了基督教对旧约过去的主张,同时也在帝国和教会权力之间进行了调解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
II.   Divine Names and Titles in Ancient Egypt I.   The Benefit of Doubt. Between Skepticism and Godlessness, Critique or Indifference in Ancient Mediterranean Religious Traditions De la « liste » à la « configuration » de puissances divines : réflexions sur les « formes élémentaires » du polythéisme en pays grec Les Caristia, fête de la parentèle à Rome Pour en finir avec la « rupture de la pax deorum ». Nouvelles perspectives sur d’anciens signes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1