Bundling Myth, Bungling Myth: The Flood Myth in Ancient and Modern Handbooks of Myth

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte Pub Date : 2015-01-13 DOI:10.1515/arege-2014-0014
R. S. Smith
{"title":"Bundling Myth, Bungling Myth: The Flood Myth in Ancient and Modern Handbooks of Myth","authors":"R. S. Smith","doi":"10.1515/arege-2014-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This essay analyzes the narrative accounts of Deucalion’s flood within the broader context of human creation in two ancient mythographical works of myth (Ovid, Apollodorus) and three modern handbooks. In each case the mythographer has been forced to reshape the episodic-one might say disparate and conflicting -nature of her or his sources and invent new connective tissue to organize early mythic time. The authorial voice and narrative aims of all writers attempting to create a coherent and comprehensive account of this period remain operative even in subliterary works such as Apollodorus’ Bibliotheke and render source criticism problematic.","PeriodicalId":29740,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","volume":"16 1","pages":"243 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/arege-2014-0014","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arege-2014-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This essay analyzes the narrative accounts of Deucalion’s flood within the broader context of human creation in two ancient mythographical works of myth (Ovid, Apollodorus) and three modern handbooks. In each case the mythographer has been forced to reshape the episodic-one might say disparate and conflicting -nature of her or his sources and invent new connective tissue to organize early mythic time. The authorial voice and narrative aims of all writers attempting to create a coherent and comprehensive account of this period remain operative even in subliterary works such as Apollodorus’ Bibliotheke and render source criticism problematic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捆绑神话,笨拙神话:古今神话手册中的洪水神话
摘要本文分析了两部古代神话作品(《奥维德》、《阿波洛多罗斯》)和三本现代手册在人类创造的大背景下对丢卡利翁洪水的叙述。在每一种情况下,神话作者都被迫重新塑造她或他的资料来源的情节性——有人可能会说不同的和相互矛盾的——并创造新的结缔组织来组织早期的神话时间。作者的声音和叙事目的,所有作家试图创造一个连贯的,全面的描述这一时期,即使在亚文学作品,如Apollodorus的《Bibliotheke》中仍然有效,并使源批评问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
II.   Divine Names and Titles in Ancient Egypt I.   The Benefit of Doubt. Between Skepticism and Godlessness, Critique or Indifference in Ancient Mediterranean Religious Traditions De la « liste » à la « configuration » de puissances divines : réflexions sur les « formes élémentaires » du polythéisme en pays grec Les Caristia, fête de la parentèle à Rome Pour en finir avec la « rupture de la pax deorum ». Nouvelles perspectives sur d’anciens signes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1