The Religious Life of Greek Automata

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1515/arege-2015-0007
Clara Bosak-Schroeder
{"title":"The Religious Life of Greek Automata","authors":"Clara Bosak-Schroeder","doi":"10.1515/arege-2015-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper examines the religious lives of Greek automata. An automaton is an object that has been constructed to move on its own.¹ I argue that ancient Greek automata at first had a solely magical life, later attained a mechanical life, and that this change from magical to mechanical allowed automata to proliferate in religious contexts. While automata were originally imagined as purely magical, the advent of advanced mechanics later in antiquity made it possible for automata to be realized and also caused Greeks in the Hellenistic and Roman ages to reinterpret magical automata as mechanical. Later Greeks’ projection of mechanical knowledge onto the magical automata of the past mirrors twentieth and twenty-first century scholars’ tendency to reinterpret ancient automata as “robots” in line with technological advances in their own time. Changes in mechanics in antiquity and the response of people to those changes leads me to advance the concept of “relative modernism.” I argue that modernism is a mind-set that recurs throughout history rather than one that emerges in a unique period of history.","PeriodicalId":29740,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","volume":"17 1","pages":"123 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/arege-2015-0007","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arege-2015-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the religious lives of Greek automata. An automaton is an object that has been constructed to move on its own.¹ I argue that ancient Greek automata at first had a solely magical life, later attained a mechanical life, and that this change from magical to mechanical allowed automata to proliferate in religious contexts. While automata were originally imagined as purely magical, the advent of advanced mechanics later in antiquity made it possible for automata to be realized and also caused Greeks in the Hellenistic and Roman ages to reinterpret magical automata as mechanical. Later Greeks’ projection of mechanical knowledge onto the magical automata of the past mirrors twentieth and twenty-first century scholars’ tendency to reinterpret ancient automata as “robots” in line with technological advances in their own time. Changes in mechanics in antiquity and the response of people to those changes leads me to advance the concept of “relative modernism.” I argue that modernism is a mind-set that recurs throughout history rather than one that emerges in a unique period of history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
希腊自动机的宗教生活
摘要本文考察了希腊自动机的宗教生活。自动机是一种被构造成能自己移动的物体。¹我认为,古希腊自动机最初只有一种神奇的生命,后来达到了机械的生命,这种从神奇到机械的变化使自动机在宗教环境中得以扩散。虽然自动机最初被想象为纯粹的魔法,但后来在古代先进力学的出现使自动机成为可能,也导致希腊化和罗马时代的希腊人将神奇的自动机重新解释为机械。后来的希腊人将机械知识投射到过去神奇的自动机上,这反映了20世纪和21世纪的学者倾向于将古代自动机重新解释为“机器人”,以符合他们自己时代的技术进步。古代力学的变化和人们对这些变化的反应使我提出了“相对现代主义”的概念。我认为,现代主义是一种贯穿历史的思维方式,而不是在一个独特的历史时期出现的思维方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
II.   Divine Names and Titles in Ancient Egypt I.   The Benefit of Doubt. Between Skepticism and Godlessness, Critique or Indifference in Ancient Mediterranean Religious Traditions De la « liste » à la « configuration » de puissances divines : réflexions sur les « formes élémentaires » du polythéisme en pays grec Les Caristia, fête de la parentèle à Rome Pour en finir avec la « rupture de la pax deorum ». Nouvelles perspectives sur d’anciens signes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1