Companion Law in the media: the pandemic and its impacts on birth rights

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Saude E Sociedade Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/s0104-12902023220540en
K. Silva, M. Gervasio, Angela Maria Belloni Cuenca
{"title":"Companion Law in the media: the pandemic and its impacts on birth rights","authors":"K. Silva, M. Gervasio, Angela Maria Belloni Cuenca","doi":"10.1590/s0104-12902023220540en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pregnant women have the right to a companion of their choice during hospitalization, pre-delivery, delivery and postpartum, a right assured nationwide by Law no. 11,108, implemented in 2005. However, health protocols have restricted these rights on the grounds of mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, this study sought to understand the approaches, actors involved, and arguments presented about noncompliance with the Companion Law during the COVID-19 pandemic by analyzing G1 Portal news articles published from March 2020 to April 2022, using the map feature. Results show that failure to comply with the aforementioned law occurred most often in the first half of 2020, justified by biosafety issues, lack of budget for purchasing personal protective equipment, and the atypical moment. In several places legal intervention was necessary for compliance, becoming a journalistic agenda, with the most emblematic case happening in Tocantins, where the veto lasted until April 2022. Analysis showed a discrepancy regarding law compliance in several municipalities and states, despite the Ministry of Health and several legal bodies having issued opinions and protocols recommending the presence of a companion.","PeriodicalId":46918,"journal":{"name":"Saude E Sociedade","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saude E Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-12902023220540en","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Pregnant women have the right to a companion of their choice during hospitalization, pre-delivery, delivery and postpartum, a right assured nationwide by Law no. 11,108, implemented in 2005. However, health protocols have restricted these rights on the grounds of mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, this study sought to understand the approaches, actors involved, and arguments presented about noncompliance with the Companion Law during the COVID-19 pandemic by analyzing G1 Portal news articles published from March 2020 to April 2022, using the map feature. Results show that failure to comply with the aforementioned law occurred most often in the first half of 2020, justified by biosafety issues, lack of budget for purchasing personal protective equipment, and the atypical moment. In several places legal intervention was necessary for compliance, becoming a journalistic agenda, with the most emblematic case happening in Tocantins, where the veto lasted until April 2022. Analysis showed a discrepancy regarding law compliance in several municipalities and states, despite the Ministry of Health and several legal bodies having issued opinions and protocols recommending the presence of a companion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
媒体中的配套法律:大流行病及其对出生权利的影响
孕妇在住院、产前、分娩和产后期间有选择伴侣的权利,这一权利在全国范围内得到了第689号法律的保障。11108,于2005年实施。然而,卫生议定书以缓解COVID-19大流行为由限制了这些权利。因此,本研究试图通过使用地图功能分析G1门户网站从2020年3月至2022年4月发表的新闻文章,了解COVID-19大流行期间关于不遵守《伴律法》的方法、参与者和论点。结果显示,不遵守上述法律的情况最常发生在2020年上半年,原因包括生物安全问题、缺乏购买个人防护装备的预算以及非典型时刻。在一些地方,法律干预是合规的必要条件,成为新闻议程,最具代表性的案例发生在托坎廷斯,否决权一直持续到2022年4月。分析表明,尽管卫生部和几个法律机构发布了建议陪同人员在场的意见和议定书,但在几个市和州,遵守法律的情况存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saude E Sociedade
Saude E Sociedade PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Plataformas digitais de entrega de alimentação: condições de trabalho e riscos para a saúde A insegurança das barragens da Vale em Minas Gerais, Brasil: aplicação da teoria da atividade à análise de desastres Mulheres com dor lombar crônica em um assentamento rural: desafios de um olhar contextualizado a partir de uma formação em Fisioterapia Vulnerabilidades e imigração boliviana na cidade de São Paulo, Brasil: entre políticas públicas de saúde, mortes e resistências coletivas Estudo sobre o acolhimento de crianças e adolescentes em instituições para pessoas com deficiência
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1